- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04434820
External Negative Pressure Dressing System vs. Traditional Wound Dressing for Cesarean Section Incision in Obese Women.
External Negative Pressure Dressing System (ENPDS) vs. Traditional Wound Dressing for Cesarean Section Incision in Obese Women.
Obesity is associated with increased cesarean section delivery rates and surgical site infections with associated increased post-operative morbidity, post-operative pain and length of hospital stay.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) technology could be used as a prophylactic measure to reduce surgical site infections in obese women undergoing cesarean section by immediate postoperative application in clean-contaminated, closed surgical incisions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/ [height (m)] 2) of 30 or greater, is a common medical comorbidity of pregnancy affecting one third of reproductive-aged women. Maternal obesity is also a well-recognized risk factor for dysfunctional labor and cesarean delivery with a cesarean section rate of 33% in obese women with BMI of 30 or greater and 43% in women with BMIs of 40 or greater.
Obesity is an independent risk factor for post-operative surgical site infection. The risk of post-cesarean surgical site infection has been shown to double for every 5 unit increase in body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m , occurring in about 10% of obese women undergoing caesarean section despite prophylactic strategies (e.g. antibiotics).
This can be explained partly by a decreased blood flow in adipose tissue and an obesity-associated inflammation causing vascular dysfunction, which results in a local hypoxic response. Hypoxia impairs oxidative bacterial killing and leads to an increased risk of surgical site infection.
Wound healing is a sequence of physiologic events that include inflammation, epithelialization, fibroplasia, and maturation. Failure of wound healing at the surgical site can lead to seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, incisional hernia and surgical site infection.
Surgical site infection SSI according to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is as an infection occurring within 30 days from the operative procedure in the part of the body where the surgery took place, where there is purulent drainage from incision, isolated organisms from the incision, dehiscence or deliberate opening by the surgeon when the patient has at least one sign or symptom of clinical infection: localized pain, edema, erythema, warmth and fever greater than 38 c (unless culture of incision is negative) or there is an abscess or other evidence of infection is found during examination of incision, reoperation, or pathologic or radiologic exam.
SSIs is divided into incisional SSI and organ/space SSI. Incisional SSI is further divided into superficial and deep incisional SSI. Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection involves skin or subcutaneous tissue cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, wound healing disruption, or dehiscence. Deep Incisional Surgical Site Infection involves deep soft tissues such as fascia or muscle within incision. Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection involves any part of the anatomy other than the incision. SSI is associated with a maternal mortality rate of up to 3%.
Wound complication, even if not accompanied by an infection, is a significant cause of postoperative morbidity following cesarean delivery. In addition to the increased cost of care, there is the inconvenience of therapy, increased postoperative pain and convalescence, as well as difficulty with activities of daily living.
It is logical to employ novel risk reducing approaches including negative pressure wound therapy at the time of surgery that may prevent wound complications and to ensure that there is a demonstrable benefit to their use for wound complication prophylaxis.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as a vacuum assisted closure (VAC), involves the controlled application of sub-atmospheric pressure to the local wound environment, using a sealed wound dressing connected to a vacuum to promote healing by primary intention by reducing the risk of hematoma / seroma due to improved lymphatic drainage and reduces the risk of wound dehiscence by decreasing the lateral and shear stress on sutures and decreasing bacterial load and wound fluids and by increasing blood flow, oxygenation, angiogenesis, and epithelialization.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Al-Waili
-
Cairo, Al-Waili, Egypt, 11658
- AinShams Maternity Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 18 or older
- BMI: 30 or greater
- undergoing Cesarean section through a Pfannenstiel incision
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prolonged Rupture of membranes >18 hours
- Intra amniotic infection
- Severe anemia
- Vasculopathies as in hypertension/pre-eclampsia, pregestational / gestational diabetes mellitus, smoking and substance abuse
- Prolonged steroids therapy as in SLE, ITP
- Intraoperative complications as bladder or bowel injury , placenta previa / accreta, difficult fetal extraction , ovarian cysts, pelvic abscess
- Intra-abdominal or subcutaneous drain
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: standard dressing group
patients will receive sterile wound dressing of gauze and tape for 4 days.
|
|
Active Comparator: External negative pressure dressing system group
patients will receive placement of a sterile dressing of gauze and occlusive adhesive over the closed incision.
The dressing's tubing will then be attached to a compact, portable negative-pressure therapy unit (Yuwell 7E-A portable suction unit) that will deliver -80 mm Hg of continuous pressure to the dressing and will remove exudates into a disposable canister for 4 days.
|
A portable suction unit that will deliver 125 mm Hg of continuous pressure to the dressing and will remove exudates into a disposable canister for 4 days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
incidence of wound dehiscence
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
separation of the incision line prior to complete healing resulting in an open wound.
|
till 30 days post operative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
post operative pain
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
post-operative pain assessed by Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale,from 0=no pain to 10=maximal pain
|
till 30 days post operative
|
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
days spent admitted to the hospital
|
till 30 days post operative
|
the need for re-admission
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
if the patient encountered surgical site infection requiring re admission to the hospital
|
till 30 days post operative
|
further need for additional antibiotics
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
if the surgical site infection required additional post operative antibiotics
|
till 30 days post operative
|
peri-incision blistering
Time Frame: till 30 days post operative
|
if any skin blistering occurs under the occlusive adhesive layer
|
till 30 days post operative
|
patient mobility
Time Frame: 4 days
|
if attachment to a negative pressure pump affects patients mobility
|
4 days
|
surgical site infection
Time Frame: 30 days post operative
|
as defined by the CDC
|
30 days post operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dalia M Mokhtar, MBBCh, resident of obstetrics and gynecology
- Study Director: Marwan O Elkady, MD, Lecturer of obstetrics and gynecology
- Study Chair: Mohammed S El Sokkary, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, Lamont RF, Wu C, Heidemann LN, Ibsen MH, Laursen JB, Ovesen PG, Rorbye C, Tanvig M, Joergensen JS. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):628-635. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15413. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
- Mark KS, Alger L, Terplan M. Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study. Surg Innov. 2014 Aug;21(4):345-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350613503736. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
- Orth TA, Gerkovich MM, Heitmann E, Overcash J, Gibbs C, Parrish M. Cesarean Delivery with External Negative Pressure Dressing System: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Surg J (N Y). 2016 Jul 20;2(3):e59-e65. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1585470. eCollection 2016 Jul.
- Scalise A, Tartaglione C, Bolletta E, Calamita R, Nicoletti G, Pierangeli M, Grassetti L, Di Benedetto G. The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena Customizable: cosmetic and therapeutic results. Int Wound J. 2015 Apr;12(2):218-23. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12370. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
- Smid MC, Dotters-Katz SK, Grace M, Wright ST, Villers MS, Hardy-Fairbanks A, Stamilio DM. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):969-978. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002259.
- Todd B. New CDC Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Am J Nurs. 2017 Aug;117(8):17. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000521963.77728.c0.
- Wells CI, Ratnayake CBB, Perrin J, Pandanaboyana S. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Closed Abdominal Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2779-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6.
- Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:81-88. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876. eCollection 2017.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 642357
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound Dehiscence
-
St. Borbala HospitalSemmelweis University; Department of Surgery, Jahn Ferend Dél-Pesti Kórház... and other collaboratorsTerminatedSurgical Wound | Surgical Site Infection | Wound Dehiscence, Surgical | Dehiscence of Internal Surgical WoundHungary
-
RedDress Ltd.Not yet recruitingDehiscence WoundIsrael
-
SeraffixTerminatedDehiscence, Surgical WoundIsrael
-
SeraffixCompletedDehiscence, Surgical WoundIsrael
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedCesarean Section; Dehiscence | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Indus Hospital and Health NetworkCompletedWound Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Polypropylene and Polyglactin 910 Suture.Wound Heal | Wound Complication | Wound DehiscencePakistan
-
French Medical Institute for Mothers and ChildrenCompletedWound Dehiscence | IncisionAfghanistan
-
Loyola UniversityMolnlycke Health Care ABCompletedCesarean Section; Complications, Wound, DehiscenceUnited States
-
Stockholm South General HospitalUnknownWound; Perineal Rupture, DehiscenceSweden
-
Menoufia UniversityCompletedCesarean Section | Wound Dehiscence