The Dual Factor Model of Mental Health in Inpatients

June 16, 2023 updated by: Ruth von Brachel, Ruhr University of Bochum

The Dual Factor Model of Mental Health: A Longitudinal Study in Inpatients

The Dual Factor Model of mental health (DFM; Greensporn & Saklofske, 2001) postulates that mental health consists of two at least partially unrelated factors, the experience or absence of psycho-pathological symptoms (i.e. depressive symptoms) and the experience or absence of positive mental health (i.e. life satisfaction, meaningfulness). Both factors contribute to an individual's well-being and mental health.The DFM has been used as a framework to describe and evaluate participants' mental health in different settings in cross-sectional and longitudinal designs mostly outside of clinical settings. Psychological Interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy are widely studied concerning their reduction of psycho-pathological symptoms. However, little is known about the effect of psychological interventions on the second factor (positive mental health) of the DFM. This is especially important, because the latter has been shown to contribute significantly to subjective well-being and to reduce the risk of suicidal intentions and behavior.

Primary, the authors aim to investigate the DFM in an inpatient sample over the course of time (pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6 and 12 months after discharge). Secondly, they aim to investigate the relationship between positive mental health and suicidal ideation over the course of time.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Participants will be divided into four groups according to the DFM over the course of time:

  1. unhappy: high psychopathology and low positive mental health; depression and/or anxiety scores above published cut -offs and positive mental health scores under published cut offs.
  2. symptomatic but content: high psychopathology and high positive mental health; depression and/or anxiety scores above published cut -offs and normal to high positive mental health scores
  3. vulnerable: low psychopathology and low positive mental health; depression and/or anxiety scores under published cut -offs and positive mental health scores under published cut offs
  4. Complete mental health: low psychopathology and high positive mental health; depression and/or anxiety scores under published cut -offs normal to high positive mental health scores.

The authors will then depict the movements of patients through these groups graphically and use regression analyses to check for differences according to age, diagnosis and gender.

Towards the second aim they will use regression analyses to investigate the protective effect of positive mental health on suicidal ideation or behavior.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1552

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Oberstdorf, Bavaria, Germany, 87561
        • Stillachhaus Privatklinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Inpatients at Stillachhaus Privatklinik fill out the questionnaires prior and post treatment as part of their routine assessment. They are invited to fill out the same measures 6 and 12 months after discharge voluntarily to support the long-term evaluation of their treatment. They have all given written informed consent to use their data for publication.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-inpatients at the Stiilachaus Privatklinik

Exclusion Criteria:

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study Group
All participants are inpatients at the clinic "Stillachhaus" in Germany. They are receiving treatment for a variety of psychological disoders, mostly depressive disoders.
All participants are receiving inpatient treatment consisting of a variety of psychological interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, third-wave interventions, psycho-education and in some cases medication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Nilges et al., 2016)
Time Frame: In the first 3 days of treatment
Measures depression, anxiety and stress with 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety, depression and stress.
In the first 3 days of treatment
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Nilges et al., 2016)
Time Frame: In the last three days of treatment
Measures depression, anxiety and stress with 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety, depression and stress.
In the last three days of treatment
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Nilges et al., 2016)
Time Frame: 6 months after discharge
Measures depression, anxiety and stress with 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety, depression and stress.
6 months after discharge
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Nilges et al., 2016)
Time Frame: 12 months after discharge
Measures depression, anxiety and stress with 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety, depression and stress.
12 months after discharge
Positive mental health scale (PMH; Lukat et al., 2016)
Time Frame: In the first 3 days of treatment
Measures positive psychological functioning with 9 items. Scores range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more positive mental health.
In the first 3 days of treatment
Positive mental health scale (PMH; Lukat et al., 2016)
Time Frame: In the last three days of treatment
Measures positive psychological functioning with 9 items. Scores range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more positive mental health
In the last three days of treatment
Positive mental health scale (PMH; Lukat et al., 2016)
Time Frame: 6 months discharge
Measures positive psychological functioning with 9 items. Scores range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more positive mental health
6 months discharge
Positive mental health scale (PMH; Lukat et al., 2016)
Time Frame: 12 months discharge
Measures positive psychological functioning with 9 items. Scores range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more positive mental health.
12 months discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ; Osman et al., 2001) ).
Time Frame: In the first 3 days of treatment
Assesses past and current suicidal ideation and behavior. Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating a higher risk for suicidal behavior.
In the first 3 days of treatment
Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ; Osman et al., 2001) ).
Time Frame: In the last three days of treatment
Assesses past and current suicidal ideation and behavior. Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating a higher risk for suicidal behavior.
In the last three days of treatment
Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ; Osman et al., 2001) ).
Time Frame: 6 months after discharge
Assesses past and current suicidal ideation and behavior. Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating a higher risk for suicidal behavior.
6 months after discharge
Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ; Osman et al., 2001) ).
Time Frame: 12 months after discharge
Assesses past and current suicidal ideation and behavior. Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating a higher risk for suicidal behavior.
12 months after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Juergen Margraf, Prof., Ruhr-University Bochum

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-387

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Since we do not have written consent to publish the data we will refrain from making it publicly available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Routine care inpatient treatment

3
Subscribe