- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04462835
Feasibility, Effectiveness and Safety of Outpatient Hysteroscopy (FESHA)
Feasibility, Effectiveness and Safety of 3000 Hysteroscopies in Outpatient Setting
Study Objective: The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of outpatient hysteroscopies performed in our Office Hysteroscopy Unit.
Design: Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data from the Office Hysteroscopy Unit database.
Setting: Tertiary care university hospital
Patients: Three thousand patients who consecutively attended an ambulatory hysteroscopy in our centre from may 2008 to october 2019
Interventions: The Office hysteroscopy was performed with several rigid 5-6 mm diameter devices when indicated with a diagnostic and/or therapeutic purpose
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Retrospective observational study of our prospectively collected database of 3000 consecutive hysteroscopies performed from may 2008 to october 2019 in our Office Hysteroscopy Unit (OHU).
All the patients who attended an ambulatory hysteroscopy in our centre during the study period were included. There were not any exclusion criteria and all data were prospectively collected in a computer database.
The primary endpoint was to determine the main results of the Outpatient Hysteroscopy Unit in terms of feasibility, effectiveness and safety. Feasibility was defined as the proportion of explorations that could be satisfactorily performed. Effectiveness was evaluated through the percentage of cases that were solved in our outpatient setting and did not require the operating room to complete their diagnosis or treatment. Safety was assessed as the percentage of complications registered.
In addition, we registered the intensity of the pain perceived by the patient with a Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS) (from 0 to 10) during the procedure and ten minutes later.
All the hysteroscopies were performed in our Office Hysteroscopy Unit by three experienced gynaecologists who performed the hysteroscopy assisted by a nurse.
For pain and anxiety management, a painkiller (ibuprofen 600 mg) and an anxiolytic (diazepam 5 mg) were orally dispensed to all patients 30 minutes before the procedure. Cervical preparation with Misoprostol (400 mcg, intravaginal administration 4-6 hours before the test) was administered only in cases of anticipated or previous failed cervical passage. Paracervical anaesthesia was administered in selected cases of several pain during the passage through the cervical canal. Premenopausal women were asked to take desogestrel 75 mg, at least 30 days prior to the procedure for endometrial preparation and if the patient was unwilling to take the medication, the procedure was preferably performed in the early follicular phase.
Hysteroscopy was performed with the several diagnostic and therapeutic rigid devices available in our Office Hysteroscopy Unit in 5-6 mm diameter: mechanical instruments (scissors and forceps), bipolar electrode (Versapoint ®), bipolar Gubini resector (Colibrí®) and mechanical morcelators (Myosure® and Truclear®), They have been set up gradually in our Unit. Saline solution 0.9% was used as a distention media with an automated pressure delivery system and he vaginoscopic approach was performed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08025
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All the patients who attended an ambulatory hysteroscopy in our centre.
Exclusion Criteria:
- There were not any exclusion criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Feasibility: proportion of hysteroscopies that could be satisfactorily performed
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Feasibility refers to the proportion of hysteroscopies that could be satisfactorily performed
|
3 months
|
Efectiveness: Percentage of cases that were solved in our outpatient setting and did not require the operating room to complete their diagnosis or treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Percentage of cases that were solved in our outpatient setting and did not require the operating room to complete their diagnosis or treatment
|
3 months
|
Safety: Percentage of complications registered
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Percentage of complications registered.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain during the hysteroscopy and 10 minutes later: Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The intensity of the pain perceived by the patient with a Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS) (from 0 which is no pain to 10 which is the worst pain ever imagined) during the procedure and ten minutes later.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marta Simo Gonzalez, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bakour SH, Jones SE, O'Donovan P. Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Dec;20(6):953-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
- Capmas P, Pourcelot AG, Giral E, Fedida D, Fernandez H. Office hysteroscopy: A report of 2402 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 May;45(5):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
- Bennett A, Lepage C, Thavorn K, Fergusson D, Murnaghan O, Coyle D, Singh SS. Effectiveness of Outpatient Versus Operating Room Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jul;41(7):930-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
- Krins T. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E10. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12662. No abstract available.
- Diwakar L, Roberts TE, Cooper NA, Middleton L, Jowett S, Daniels J, Smith P, Clark TJ; OPT trial collaborative group. An economic evaluation of outpatient versus inpatient polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):625-31. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13434. Epub 2015 May 25.
- Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, Di Cesare C, Van Kerrebroeck H, De Angelis MC, Di Spiezio Sardo A. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):115-122.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIBSP-FES-2019-96
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hysteroscopy
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompleted
-
EgymedicalpediaCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingHysteroscopy | Ciprofol
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedOffice HysteroscopyEgypt
-
Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation TrustCompletedHysteroscopy TechniqueUnited Kingdom
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownHysteroscopy | Postmenopausal WomenBrazil
-
Assuta Ashdod HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Office HysteroscopyIsrael