- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04497220
Poke and a Placebo
January 16, 2024 updated by: University of Minnesota
Will Negative Phrasing Create a Nocebo Effect During Epidural Placement When Compared to Positive Phrasing? A Randomized Controlled Trial
To discover if a positive description of the procedure for an epidural can reduce the overall pain score associated with the procedure.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study intervention consists of two separate scripts read to the patient by the anesthesiologist performing their labor epidural.
One script will contain the wording "Poke and a burn" prior to subcutaneous local anesthetic administration for the epidural placement and one will contain "this is numbing medication, which will make the rest of the procedure go easier".
There will be no difference in the epidural placement, medications, or the rest of the script.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Aaron Berg, MD
- Phone Number: 612-624-9990
- Email: bergx831@umn.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jonah Pearson, MD
- Phone Number: 612-625-6659
- Email: pears731@umn.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
- Recruiting
- University of Minnesota
-
Contact:
- Candace Nelson
- Phone Number: 612-626-2465
- Email: nelso377@umn.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy
- requesting an epidural for the first time
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous epidural (either for labor or for surgery)
- BMI greater than 40 kg/m^2
- previous lumbar spine surgery
- inability to speak English
- a history of chronic pain or are on chronic opioids
- a history of opioid drug abuse
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Nocebo Group
Participants in this group will receive the control treatment
|
The study intervention consists of two separate scripts read to the patient by the anesthesiologist performing their labor epidural.
The control script includes language containing the wording "Poke and a burn" said prior to numbing medication for the epidural procedure.
There will be no difference in the epidural placement, medications, or the rest of the script.
|
Experimental: Positive Connotation Group
Participants in this group will receive the experimental treatment.
|
The study intervention consists of two separate scripts read to the patient by the anesthesiologist performing their labor epidural.
The experimental script includes language containing the wording "this is numbing medication, which will make the rest of the procedure go easier" said prior to numbing medication for the epidural procedure.
There will be no difference in the epidural placement, medications, or the rest of the script.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Max pain score during the epidural procedure
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Maximum pain score will be measured using a single 11-point Numeric Rating Scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum imaginable pain.
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall satisfaction during the epidural procedure
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Overall satisfaction during the epidural procedure will be measured used a 5-point likert scale: 5=very satisfied, 4=satisfied, 3=neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 1=very dissatisfied.
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aaron Berg, MD, University of Minnesota
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 12, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 29, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
August 4, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 17, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 16, 2024
Last Verified
January 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- ANES-2020-29006
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of ChicagoRecruitingAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMNot yet recruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Matthew BorzageRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; ReactionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Negative Connotation Langauge
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedAnaesthesiaFrance, Belgium
-
Oslo University HospitalOtivio ASCompletedWound Healing, Leg and Foot Ulcers, Macrocirculation, MicrocirculationNorway
-
Brno University HospitalMasaryk UniversityRecruitingWeaning FailureCzechia
-
University of DundeeCompleted
-
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIACompleted
-
GeneScience Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University; First Affiliated... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...Not yet recruitingInfection, Surgical Site
-
Université Catholique de LouvainCompletedSleep Apnea Syndromes | Snoring
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedHigh Risk Abdominal WoundsUnited States
-
McGill UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedLung Diseases | Lung Diseases, Obstructive | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease