Reducing Error in ER Settings Through Attention Restoration Theory (RESTART)

April 20, 2021 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

RESTART Trials: Reducing Error in ER Settings Through Attention Restoration Theory

The purpose of this research study is to find out about how looking at different types of pictures can affect people's attention spans. Attention Restoration Theory (ART) suggests that there are two types of attention. One type (directed attention) can become tired and cause people to make mistakes. The other type (involuntary attention) gives directed attention a chance to rest, so people make less mistakes. Certain types of pictures are good at capturing involuntary attention. We think that capturing involuntary attention will help emergency physicians make less mistakes on tests of attention. This study will allow us to learn more about it.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, participants will be asked to do the following things:

  1. Before their usual shift in the emergency department, arrive ten minutes early to rate their mood and complete a Digit Span Backwards (DSB) task that tests their memory of different sets of numbers.
  2. Five hours into their shift, they will take a ten minute break.
  3. During this break, they will be randomly assigned to view either a picture presentation of nature slides or urban slides.
  4. After the presentation, they will complete the Digit Span Backwards task again, they will rate their mood again, then return to their shift.

Participation in this study will last up to 30 minutes. Approximately fifty individuals will participate in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Emergency Medicine Resident of any PGY level. (1-5)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anybody under the age of 18
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Nature
participants will view a presentation of nature slides
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Urban
participants will view a presentation of urban slides

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working memory
Time Frame: 5 hours
Working memory will be assessed using the Digit Span test. Participants are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in order (forward span) or in reverse order (backward span). Number of correctly repeated numbers is summed to yield a score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicated better working memory
5 hours
Positive mood
Time Frame: 5 hours
Positive mood will be assess using the positive affect (PA) scale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The PA scale consists of 10 adjectives which are rated on a 5 point scale from slightly or not at all to extremely. Items are summed to yield a score ranging from 10 to 50 with higher number indicating higher affect.
5 hours
Negative mood
Time Frame: 5 hours
Negative mood will be assess using the negative affect (NA) scale of the PANAS. The NA scale consists of 10 adjectives which are rated on a 5 point scale from slightly or not at all to extremely. Items are summed to yield a score ranging from 10 to 50 with higher number indicating higher affect.
5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Miller, DO, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HM20019844

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Fatigue, Attention Restoration

Clinical Trials on Nature slides

3
Subscribe