Bridging the Gap to Improve Mental Health Treatment Utilization

January 6, 2022 updated by: Tina R Goldstein, University of Pittsburgh

Bridging the Gap: Utility of a Single Session Intervention to Change Attitudes Toward Treatment, and Improve Acceptance of Further Psychotherapy for Depressed and/or Anxious Youth and Their Caretakers

Bridging the Gap aims to improve access to effective mental health treatment in a primary care setting through utilization of single session growth mindset interventions for parents and for youths. This project will also utilize focus groups and qualitative interviews to gain feedback on a single session online intervention in a rural pediatric primary care practice.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Bridging the Gap purposes to collect feedback on a single session growth mindset intervention (GMI) for parents and for youths designed to instill beliefs that personal traits (including mental health problems) are malleable. Feedback will also be collected to identify ways to improve implementing single session interventions (SSIs) in a primary care setting as well as identifying the impact on work-flow of this GMI. Patients presenting with depression and/or anxiety will all receive the GMI and will have the option of participating in focus groups/interviews pre and post-intervention to provide feedback on the intervention. Providers at this rural pediatric primary care practice will also have the chance to participate in focus groups/interviews pre and post-intervention implementation.

Assignment of Interventions: As an open trial, all participants will be assigned to the intervention arm and will receive the GMI.

This study is an open trial pilot project to collect feedback on a single session growth mindset intervention (GMI) (n=25 youth/caretaker dyads). Feedback from pre and post-intervention focus groups/interviews will be collected for 8 parents, 8 youth, and 8 treatment providers.

The aims of the study are to:

  1. Collect feedback from providers, parents, and participants pre and post- GMI to identify ways to improve implementing single session interventions (SSIs) in a primary care setting.
  2. Identify the impact on work-flow of using an online single session called Growth Mindset Intervention in a primary care setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States, 16201
        • Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP- Armstrong Kittanning) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with depression and/or anxiety, as identified by the patient, parent, or provider
  • 10-18 years old
  • CBT is recommended by provider. Receipt of mental health services upon enrollment will be monitored but will not preclude participation
  • Participants must reside with a legal guardian
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded if they have conditions that might impair their ability to effectively engage in Bridging the Gap, i.e
  • Those in a current manic episode
  • Those in a current psychotic episode
  • Those diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Those who have issues with substance abuse
  • Participants with current involvement with child welfare.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: IPR + GMI
Participants receiving IPR + GMI will complete a 30-minute on-line intervention via qualtrics that covers the following topics: (1) Educate youth and caregiver that thoughts and emotions are not fixed but are malleable and subject to change; (2) provide youth and families with a brief intervention that instills hopefulness through an action plan for managing internalizing symptoms; (3) assist with developing system of support to access during times of distress; and (4) educate the caregiver on the importance of these interventions.
The IPR + GMI intervention aims to impact reported hopelessness, attitudes to treatment, and view of self as changeable as well as targets treatment attendance and utilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in child and parental attitudes towards therapy at 4 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Child and parental attitudes towards therapy will be assessed via Attitudes Towards Therapy Scale, as the primary outcome of Bridging the Gap. Scores on this one question assessment range from 0= view of therapy as not at all helpful to 10= view of therapy as very helpful.
Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Change from baseline in view of emotions as changeable at 4 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Child and parental views of personality as changeable will be assessed via Implicit Theory of Emotions Scale, as the primary outcome of Bridging the Gap. The Implicit Theory of Emotion contains 4 questions, with two incremental items and two entity items. Each item is rated using a 7-point Likert scale with 1= strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The two entity items are reverse-scored. Scores range from 4-28 and higher scores indicate a view of emotions as changeable.
Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Change from baseline in view of personality as changeable at 4 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Child and parental views of personality as changeable will be assessed via Implicit Theory of Personality Questionnaire, as the primary outcome of Bridging the Gap. The Implicit Theory of Personality Questionnaire contains 3 questions with a range of scores from 3 to 18, with lower scores indicating a view of personality as changeable.
Baseline vs. 4 week follow-up
Hopelessness
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Child and parent hopelessness will be assessed via Beck Hopelessness Short Scale, as the primary outcome of Bridging the Gap. This 4-item scale is totaled using the sum of item scores. Scores range from 0-12, with higher scores indicating more hopelessness.
Up to 4 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety Severity
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Child anxiety severity will be assessed via SCARED 5-item, as a secondary outcome of Bridging the Gap. This 5-item assessment has scores ranging from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more self-reported anxiety.
Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Depression Severity
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Child and parent depression severity will be assessed via MFQ questionnaire, as a secondary outcome of Bridging the Gap. The MFQ Child version has scores ranging from 0-66, with a higher score indicating more severe depression. The MFQ Parent version has scores ranging from 0-69, with higher score indicating more severe depression.
Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Psychological distress
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after baseline
Child and parent psychological distress will be assessed via PHQ4 questionnaire, as a secondary outcome of Bridging the Gap. The PHQ4 contains 4 questions, 2 questions relating to depression and 2 questions relating to anxiety, with scores ranging from 0-12. Higher scores on the PHQ4 indicate more severe psychological distress.
Up to 4 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19110071
  • P50MH115838-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All requests for study data will follow NIMH's data sharing and data use policies. The final completely de-identified dataset(s) will include demographic and clinical data at baseline, and primary and secondary outcomes for all studies, including those funded by the innovation contests. These analytic datasets may also include derived variables with documentation. Our form datasets will include original case report forms, a detailed codebook of variable names, value labels, and programming formats and all study documentation including the protocol and manual of procedures. For descriptive/raw data, study investigators/study staff will upload to NIMH's National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Health Illness (NDCT) on a semi-annual basis all analyzed data being uploaded prior to primary paper publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

These data will be released to the NDCT soon after each project's "main outcomes" manuscript is accepted for publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

In addition to public access to the NDCT, data can also be accessed by contacting ETUDES Center investigators.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on IPR + GMI

3
Subscribe