Safety and Efficacy of NTX-001 Compared to SOC in Acute Single Peripheral Nerve Injuries

February 5, 2024 updated by: Neuraptive Therapeutics Inc.

Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Patient and Evaluator Blinded, Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NTX-001 Compared to SOC in the Treatment of Acute Single Transected Peripheral Nerve Injury Occurring Below the Distal Border of the Brachial Plexus Requiring Surgical Repair.

NTX-001 is a single use surgical product intended for use in conjunction with standard suture neurorrhaphy of severed nerves in patients between 16 and 80 years of age.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

NTX-001 (Product) is a surgical product that consists of an active solution (drug), an isolation chamber medical device (chamber or device) and two (2) other sterile solutions.

NTX-001 has been developed as a surgical product to be used in conjunction with standard suture neurorrhaphy of a severed nerve. Use of NTX-001 is intended to safely accelerate the often slow and diminished return of function in repaired nerves. It often takes months and/or years to determine if function will be restored. By that point, restoration is often incomplete and can result in lifelong motor and/or sensory deficits. By reconnecting (PEG-fusion) a substantial number of axons within a severed nerve, the degeneration-regeneration cycle and subsequent atrophy may be reduced or even prevented for those axons and their targets, respectively. NTX-001 (PEG-fusion) has the potential to avoid the consequences of protracted denervation of distal target tissues by eliminating the period of total denervation thus reducing the time to stable recovery and providing greater innervation to affected tissues.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
        • UF Health - University of FL - Gainesville
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Orlando Health
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • Curtis National Hand Center
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43202
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Hand and Upper Extremity Center
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23398
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98107
        • Harborview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is at least 12 years of age and not older than 80.
  • The subject has sustained a confirmed (intra-op assessment) single transected peripheral nerve injury.
  • The subject's nerve injury is classified as Sunderland's Fourth and Fifth Degree (Class III)
  • The subject's nerve injury is amenable to minimal or acceptable tension, in direct, end-to-end repair.
  • The surgical repair will occur within 48 hours of injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has a PNI with a segmental loss (gap) that cannot be repaired with minimal or acceptable tension.
  • Other treatments known to affect the growth and/or physiology of the neural and vascular system.
  • The nerve injury has vascular damage that cannot be repaired to provide adequate perfusion of the injured site.
  • The subject is pregnant and/or is breastfeeding.
  • The subject has a significant medical comorbidity precluding immediate repair.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NTX-001
NTX-001 used during surgical repair of an upper extremity peripheral nerve injury in conjuction with standard suture neurorrhaphy.
One time use surgical product, 3 solutions applied topically, in sequence, to the peripheral nerve repair site, in conjunction with standard suture neurorrhaphy. An isolation chamber medical device (device) is utilized to focus the application of PEG (Solution #2) on the coapted nerve for the required amount of exposure time.
Other Names:
  • PEG-fusion
No Intervention: Standard of Care
standard suture neurorrhaphy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 48 Weeks
An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study product or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the exposure to the study product.
Up to 48 Weeks
Michigan Hand Questionnaire Total Score (MHQ)
Time Frame: Week 12
The MHQ measures hand function and is scored from 0-100; with 100 being the "best" score.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The NPRS measures pain intensity on a scale from 0 representing no pain and 10 to the worst pain as bad as you can imagine.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Modified British Medical Research Council (MMRC) sensory grading (S0-S4)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The SWMT measures sensation as using a score from S0 to S4; higher score indicates better sensation.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Modified British Medical Research Council (MMRC) motor grading (M0-M5)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The MRCC motor measures the function of the muscles; on a scale from M0 to M5; the higher score indicates better strength.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test (SWMT)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The SWMT assesses sensation using using equipment that measures force felt in grams.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Pinch Strength
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The Pinch test assesses strength using using equipment that measures strength in pounds.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
The Grip test assesses strength using using equipment that measures strength in pounds.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48
The CISS focuses on the impact of cold intolerance on activities of daily life; the score ranges a score between 0 and 10, where 0 is no symptoms at all and 100 is the most severe symptoms you can possibly imagine.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48
The PGIC measures information about the effect of a treatment intervention in an individual subject, scored 0 to 7; with 0 being the worst and 7 being the best.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Seth Schulman, MD, Neuraptive Therapeutics Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Clinical Trials on NTX-001

3
Subscribe