A Study of NTX-001 in the Treatment and Prevention of Facial Paralysis Requiring Surgical Repair.

September 6, 2023 updated by: Neuraptive Therapeutics Inc.

A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Subject and Evaluator Blinded, Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NTX-001 Compared to Standard of Care in the Treatment and Prevention of Facial Paralysis Requiring Surgical Repair.

This study involves the use of an Investigational Product called NTX-001. It is a product used in the repair of nerve injuries. It is used in the operating room. The main purposes of this study are to 1) see how safe NTX-001 is when used in nerve repair and, 2) see if your nerve becomes functional in a shorter period of time when compared to what is normally done to treat nerve injuries.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Facial paralysis can be a consequence of traumatic facial nerve injury, iatrogenic causes, malignancy, congenital syndromes, and viral infections. Prolonged paralysis can result in ocular complications, articulation difficulties, impaired feeding, and difficulty in conveying emotion through expressive movement. The current treatment for permanent facial paralysis is facial reanimation surgery, which encompasses a broad range of procedures that restore form and function to the paralyzed face.

The importance of understanding the health utility of facial paralysis and the value of facial reanimation surgery increases. PEG-fusion is a promising therapy for patients that have or will have nerve conditions or injuries resulting in facial palsy that can be addressed surgically. Patients that have clinical evidence of facial paralysis requiring facial nerve repair from conditions or interventions that have or may result in paralysis will be evaluated for participation. The primary objective is to assess the safety of NTX-001 across 12 months following the nerve repair. The study will measure improvement in Facial Grading System (FG) for efficacy. Additionally, measures will include an EMG evaluation for assessment of nerve function intraoperatively, image-based automatic facial landmark analysis, improvement in Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale score, and Patient Global Impression of Change Response (PGIC).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • University of Indiana
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63130
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710-1000
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The subject has clinical evidence of facial paralysis requiring facial nerve repair from conditions or interventions that have or may result in paralysis.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects whose nerve repair will occur greater than 48 hours after nerve transection.

Subjects requiring repair of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve. Subjects requiring repair involving an allograft or conduit except for procedures that require grafting of the other nerve branches when repairing the main facial nerve.

Subjects with Bell's palsy that have signs of spontaneous recovery by 12 months.

Subjects who, in the judgment of the investigator, are not likely to demonstrate meaningful recovery within 6 weeks due to significant facial muscle atrophy.

Subjects on chronic corticosteroid therapy within 14 days of repair.

The subject has documented history or clinical signs of:

Clinically significant neuropathy from any cause i.e., medications, chemotherapy, diabetes; Clinically significant systemic neuromuscular disease; Clinically significant local or systemic neurological deficit from other than the condition under study such as stroke; Or other treatments are known to affect the growth and/or physiology of the neural and vascular system with the exception of radiation therapy; The subject has a known allergy to polyethylene glycol (PEG) or human-grade silicone.

The subject is not able to strictly adhere to the rules of the current clinical protocol, e.g., significant mental health issues, homelessness, incarceration, intellectually or developmentally challenged without proper legal representation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NTX-001
Solution #1, Solution #2 Active, Solution #3
2 solutions plus a delivery device; one time use surgical product
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Standard neurorrhaphy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events for Safety
Time Frame: Adverse events will be assessed and recorded from start of study through 48 weeks or approximately 1 year..
Measuring the safety of NTX-001 following the nerve repair based on the number of reported adverse events.
Adverse events will be assessed and recorded from start of study through 48 weeks or approximately 1 year..
Sunnybrook Facial Grading System
Time Frame: From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Change in Sunnybrook Facial Grading score from baseline as compared to Week 6;
From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative EMG
Time Frame: Once in the operating room.
Electromyography (EMG) measures amplitude and duration of facial motor unit action potentials which reflects in the number of innervated muscle fibers. This may demonstrate if reinnervation or nerve conduction has been restored in the operating room.
Once in the operating room.
Image-based automatic facial landmark identification system
Time Frame: From screening visit, and at weeks 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Image analysis automatically identifies facial landmarks and uses the position of those landmarks to estimate facial symmetry and/or evaluate facial neuromuscular diseases.
From screening visit, and at weeks 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale
Time Frame: From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
FaCE is a patient questionnaire that measures the patient's perception of their facial movement, facial comfort, oral function, eye comfort, tear control, and social function. Each one is scored separately to a total of 100, where 0 is the worst possible score to 100 is the best.
From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
PGIC is a patient questionnaire that evaluates the patients perception of their overall health status. A single-question with answers on a 7-point scale scored as: (1) "very much better," (2) "much better," (3) "a little better," (4) "no change," (5) "a little worse," (6) "much worse," or (7) "very much worse." The following ranges demonstrate disease worsening (0-3 points), stable disease (4 points) or disease improvement (5-7 points) since the initial baseline or prior assessment.
From screening visit, and at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Seth Schulman, MD, Chief Medical Officer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Paralysis

Clinical Trials on NTX-001

3
Subscribe