US-guided Trocar Versus Seldiger Technique for Percutaneous Cholecystostomy (TROSELCII)

November 22, 2022 updated by: Stavros Spiliopoulos, Attikon Hospital

Randomized Comparison of US-guided TROcar Versus SELdiger Technique for Percutaneous Cholecystostomy. The TROSELC II Trial.

A single-center randomized comparison of bedside ultrasound (US)-guided trocar technique versus the US-guided Seldinger technique for percutaneous cholecystostomy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT), comparing bedside US-guided trocar technique versus the US-guided Seldinger technique for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC). The study will randomize a total of 100 consecutive patients (50 in each group) undergoing PC at one large tertiary university hospital. The primary endpoints will be technical success and procedure-related complication rates. Secondary endpoints will be procedural duration, pain assessment, and clinical success after up to 3 months of follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Attiki
      • Athens, Attiki, Greece, 12461
        • "ATTIKON" University General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients requiring PC, regardless of the underlying cause.
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years or >100 years
  • The necessity for CT-guided PC catheter placement, according to the judgment of the performing physician
  • Severe uncontrollable coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group T
Patients will be randomized to undergo PC catheter placement (8-French) using the trocar method under US guidance while receiving local anesthesia and opioid analgesic, in a bedside setting, either in the US room or in the ICU.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy using the one-step Trocar technique under US guidance. An 8Fr Trocar catheter will be inserted percutaneously within the gallbladder under real-time US guidance. The procedure will be performed using an aseptic technique, local anesthesia and intravenous opioid analgesia.
Active Comparator: Group S
Patients will be randomized to undergo PC catheter placement (8-French) using the Sellinger method under US guidance while receiving local anesthesia and opioid analgesic, in a bedside setting, either in the US room or in the ICU.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy using the Seldinger technique under US guidance. Following percutaneous puncture of the gallbladder with an 18G needle under real-time US guidance, an 8Fr catheter will be inserted percutaneously over the wire within the gallbladder under real-time US guidance. The procedure will be performed using an aseptic technique, local anesthesia and intravenous opioid analgesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: At the end of the procedure
Image verified catheter placement within the gallbladder and subsequent bile aspiration
At the end of the procedure
Procedure-related complications
Time Frame: 3 months
Minor or major complications attributed to the procedure
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of the procedure
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
The time period between administration of local anesthesia and pigtail catheter positioning within the gallbladder
Intraprocedural
Intraprocedural pain
Time Frame: End of the procedure
pain experienced during the procedure assessed using a standard visual analogue score the procedure, as assessed using a standard visual analog score
End of the procedure
Post-procedural pain
Time Frame: 12 hours
Pain experienced up to12 hours after procedure assessed using a standard visual analogue score (VAS - Visual Analog Scale 0-10, 0 representing no pain & 10 representing worst pain experienced)
12 hours
Clinical success
Time Frame: 72 hours
Gradual subsidence of signs, symptoms, and elevated inflammatory markers
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stavros Spiliopoulos, MD, PhD, ATTIKO University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD could be available upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD could be available after the completion of the study upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

email

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on Trocar percutaneous cholecystostomy

3
Subscribe