Mortality Risk Estimation in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: Beyond the Tokyo Guidelines (ACME)

February 3, 2021 updated by: Ana María González Castillo, Hospital del Mar

Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments, the complication rate of ACC is 20-55%, and the mortality rate is 0.5-15% in recent series. The Tokyo Guidelines (TG) advocate for different initial treatments of ACC with no clear evidence that all patients will benefit from them.

The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors for mortality in ACC and compare them with TG classification.

It is a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2011 to December 2016 in a single center with a dedicated surgical emergency unit in a Metropolitan University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. The analysis of the data was finished in March 2020.

The study candidates comprised 963 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of ACC according to the TG18 and/or received a diagnosis of ACC in the Pathology report in those that an emergent cholecystectomy was performed.

The study case definition was a 'Pure Acute Cholecystitis' (pure ACC); therefore, patients with any other concomitant diagnosis potentially influencing outcome (Postoperative cholecystitis, Acute Cholangitis, Acute Pancreatitis, Incidental Cholecystectomy, Acalculous Cholecystitis, Chronic Cholecystitis/Persistent Colic, Post-endoscopic retrograde pancreato-cholangiography, or Neoplasia) were excluded from the final analysis.

Variables:

Primary data were available from a prospective database maintained in File Maker v.12 (Mountainview, CA, USA), which included basic demographic data, type of interventions, sex, days of admission, and complications. Every record was completed by browsing the electronic patient record, adding laboratory and microbiology data, as well as antibiotic therapy, duration of procedure, additional procedures, and grade of acute cholecystitis according to the TG18 diagnostic criteria.

Preoperative comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgical risk by ASA classification. The type of initial treatment was classified as Surgical Treatment (Cholecystectomy either by laparoscopy or laparotomy) or Non-Surgical Treatment, which was either percutaneous cholecystostomy or intravenous antibiotics alone.

The main outcome measure was the mortality after the diagnostic of ACC. In the patients that were discharged, 30 days after the diagnosis, if the patients was not discharged in 30 days, at any time during the same admission.

Interventions:

All patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy from the moment the diagnosis was formulated, according to a fixed protocol.

Ultrasound-guided cholecystostomy was performed percutaneously with an 8-Fr catheter (SKATER ™, Argon Medical Devices, Rochester, NY, USA) by either transhepatic or transperitoneal insertion, at the discretion of the radiologist.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy was performed according to the French technique using 4 trochars. The content of the gallbladder was evacuated by Veress needle puncture when necessary.

Statistical Analysis:

The normal distribution of the quantitative variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which showed that none of the variables were normally distributed; therefore, their values were expressed as median and interquartile ranges. The Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test was used to assess the significance of differences between means.

The association between qualitative variables was assessed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as required. The increased risk of an event associated with a variable was reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

As this was a retrospective observational study and the treatment groups were markedly asymmetric, we used the propensity score matching method to select and compare two subgroups of patients evenly balanced by severity according to the TG18 criteria and by comorbidity according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

A model for predicting mortality was built using binomial logistic regression with stepwise progressive conditional entry and standard baseline conditions for admission and rejection of variables with significant differences in the univariate analysis. The discrimination power of the model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and was compared with the DeLong method.

Legal and Ethical considerations This study was approved by the clinical research ethical committee of the Hospital del Mar and was classified as a non-clinical trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

963

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admited with a diagnostic of Acute Cholecystitis in a dedicated surgical emergency unit, from January 2011 to December 2016, in a Metropolitan University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients were selected if they had acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines of 2018 (TG18) and/or received a diagnosis of ACC in the Pathology report. The study case definition was a 'Pure Acute Cholecystitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe the mortality in patients with a diagnostic of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis.
Time Frame: 2011-2016

The main outcome measure was the number of deaths after the diagnosis of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis.

In the patients that were discharged: 30 days after the diagnosis. If the patients was not discharged in 30 days, at any time during the same admission.

2011-2016
To describe the causes of death after a diagnostic of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Time Frame: 2011-2016
Every death after a diagnostic of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis was defined as: septic shock, heart failure, respiratory failure and/or complication of a concomitant chronic disease before the diagnostic of pure ACC.
2011-2016

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study of the risk factors for mortality in patients with a diagnostic of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Time Frame: 2011-2016

The association between qualitative variables was assessed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as required. The increased risk of an event associated with a variable was reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

  • Demographic data (gender, age)
  • Physiological parameters (Temperature, blood pressure, cardiac and respiratory rates)
  • Laboratory test (Bilirubin, Creatinine, Alkaline phosphatase, Gamma-glutamyl-transpherase, Glutamil oxaloacetic transaminase, PT-INR, Lactate, WBC, Partial oxygen pressure, CRP and Platelets)
  • Type of intervention and additional procedures
  • Grade of severity of ACC following the TG18
  • Preoperative comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgical risk by ASA classification.
2011-2016
Comparison the mortality of surgical treatment vs. non-surgical treatment
Time Frame: 2011-2016
As this was a retrospective observational study and the treatment groups were markedly asymmetric, we performed a propensity score matching method to select patients with an equal morbidity according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index and TG18 Classification at the momento of the diagnostic of ACC. Then we classified the complications of each group following the Clavien-Dindo's Classification.
2011-2016

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana María González-Castillo, M.D., Hospital del Mar

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all primary and secondary variables of anonimyzed individual data set will be provided

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2021 to January 2022

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

any researcher

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on CHOLECYSTECTOMY

3
Subscribe