Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Prospective Outcomes Study (RAPID)

April 3, 2026 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation
The objective of this study is to compile real-world outcomes of Boston Scientific commercially approved radiofrequency (RF) ablation systems in the treatment of patients diagnosed with pain

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

298

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium
        • ZNA Hoge Beuken
      • Bruges, Belgium
        • St. Jan
      • Olbia, Italy
        • Mater Olbia Hospital
      • Geldrop, Netherlands
        • St. Anna Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85203
        • Elite Pain and Spine Institute
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
    • Connecticut
      • Westport, Connecticut, United States, 06880
        • The Spine Wellness Center in Westport
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Shepherd Center
    • Illinois
      • Quincy, Illinois, United States, 62301
        • Quincy Medical Group
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55439
        • Twin Cities Pain Clinic and Surgery Center
    • North Carolina
      • Huntersville, North Carolina, United States, 28078
        • Carolinas Research Institute
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • UC Health Pain Medicine
      • Loveland, Ohio, United States, 45140
        • Premier Pain Treatment Institute
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623
        • Toledo Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Sewickley, Pennsylvania, United States, 15143
        • Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Chronic Pain

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Study candidate is scheduled to be treated with a commercially approved Boston Scientific RF system for pain per local Directions for Use (DFU)
  • Signed a valid, IRB/EC/REB-approved informed consent form

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meets any contraindications per locally applicable Directions for Use (DFU)
  • Currently diagnosed with cognitive impairment, or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or to complete study assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Boston Scientific Radiofrequency Ablation Systems
Subjects with pain treated with a commercially approved Boston Scientific RF system
Radiofrequency Ablation for treatment of chronic pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 12-months post-procedure
Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale, subjects will rate themselves as: very much improved; much improved; minimally improved; no change; minimally worse; much worse; or very much worse compared with Baseline
12-months post-procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Rate
Time Frame: 12-months post-procedure
Percentage of subjects with a 30 percent or greater reduction from Baseline in targeted pain intensity
12-months post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Natalie Bloom Lyons, M.S., Boston Scientific Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency Ablation

Subscribe