Macular Perfusion Changes After Anti-VEGF Versus Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PROPER)

January 18, 2024 updated by: Ayman Gehad Elnahry, Cairo University

Macular Perfusion Changes in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Following Anti-VEGF Therapy Versus Targeted and Pan-retinal Photocoagulation Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes. Since 1981, Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). For this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR.

Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy. Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases was recommended by some investigators. Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes.

Since 1981, PRP has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). for this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by DRCR.net has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR. However, the effect of both treatment modalities on macular perfusion has been inconclusive with no studies comparing the effect of both.

Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks and is being replaced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases.

OCTA is a new noninvasive method of acquiring high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature that can be utilized in the management and study of retinal diseases without the need for dye injection. It allows the visualization of both the superficial and deep retinal capillary layers separately and the construction of microvascular flow maps allowing quantitative analysis of vascular parameters.

OCTA uses high-speed OCT scanning to detect the flow of blood by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans repeated at the same location. Because of the movement of erythrocytes within a vessel, compared to stationary areas of the surrounding retina, only perfused blood vessels will result in signal decorrelation, leading to their imaging. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio.

Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR without macular edema after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 11956
        • Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years old
  2. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  3. PDR
  4. Central macular thickness less than 300 µm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Central macular thickness more than 300 µm
  2. Previous retinal laser treatment
  3. Ocular conditions that may affect macular perfusion (e.g. retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, vasculitis etc.)
  4. Any previous treatment for diabetic macular edema.
  5. Presence of epiretinal membrane involving the macula or vitreomacular traction
  6. Media opacity such vitreous hemorrhage and dense cataract.
  7. Patients with previous cataract surgery within the last 3 months.
  8. Uncontrolled glaucoma
  9. Thromboembolic events within 6 months
  10. Tractional retinal detachment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent
Intravitreal injections of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml of Bevacizumab every 4 weeks through 12- week visit then pro re nata to complete 12 months according to Protocol S.
Bevacizumab will be intravitreally injected every 4 weeks through 12 weeks then pro re nata thereafter for 12 months.
Other Names:
  • Avastin
Active Comparator: Targeted retinal photocoagulation
Targeted retinal photocoagulation guided by fundus fluorescein angiography will be administered after topical anesthesia, directed to areas of nonperfused peripheral retina plus a 1-disc area margin using the Mainster lens. Subsequent treatments if needed will be delivered at 3 monthly intervals for a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The extent of the laser applied will be determined based on areas of nonperfusion identified by fundus fluorescein angiography.
Targeted retinal photocoagulation will be administered to nonperfused areas detected on fundus fluorescein angiography at baseline and repeated every 3 months as needed for 12 months.
Active Comparator: Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation

Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation will be performed at baseline and then every 3 months thereafter if needed, for a minimum follow-up period of 12 months.

PRP will be performed at two consecutive sessions with adherence to the guidelines of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. Following topical anesthesia, 1000 to 1200 laser spots will be applied to the retina at each session with a 532 nm frequency doubled Nd-YAG laser (VISULAS, Carl Zeiss, Germany) using a spot size of 300-500 μm. PRP will be applied in all 4 retina quadrants.

The Mainster lens will be used. Retreatment will be done according to the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research network protocol S classification for patients with stable, worsening, or with failure of regression of neovascularization.

Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation will be applied to perfused and nonperfused areas of the retinal periphery at baseline and every 3 months as needed for 12 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in foveal avascular zone area
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in the foveal avascular zone area will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in vascular density of the retinal capillary plexuses
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in retinal capillary vascular densities at different capillary layers will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in neovessels
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in neovessels following treatment with each modality will be evaluated clinically and by fundus fluorescein angiography and the response to treatment will be classified according to the criteria of protocol S of the DRCR network
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in central macular thickness
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in central macular thickness will be evaluated following treatment with each modality using optical coherence tomography.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in best corrected visual acuity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using standard Snellen charts.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in macular sensitivity
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in the macular sensitivity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using macular microperimetry.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in orbital blood flow
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
The change in orbital blood flow will be assessed following treatment with each modality using orbital color duplex imaging.
0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ayman G Elnahry, MD, PhD, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Ahmed A Abdel-Kader, MD, PhD, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Mohamed A Eldaly, MD, PhD, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Wael A Yussuf, MD, MSc, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Ahmed A Mohalhal, MD, PhD, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Results will be posted on clinicaltrials.gov when the study is concluded.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Bevacizumab Injection

3
Subscribe