Embryos With Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) Inconclusive Result: Clinical Implications

February 1, 2021 updated by: IVI Vigo
One of the most remarkable improvements in trophoectoderm cells biopsy is the robustness of diagnosis as result of analyzing multiple cells. However, there is a proportion of embryos that lack of diagnosis due to amplification failure or inconclusive results ranging between 0,4% and 6%. Information about embryo repeated biopsy after an inconclusive result in a first biopsy is very scarce. No specific conclusions can be drawn, due to the limited information currently available concerning reproductive outcomes for patients who had embryo transfer after a second biopsy, due to a first one having an inconclusive result. Investigators purpose a multicenter retrospective observational study with the aim to evaluate the reproductive potential of re-biopsied blastocyst with inconclusive results on preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using the implantation rate (IR) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) as principal variables.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The main objective of assisted reproduction technologies (ART) is to achieve a healthy live newborn. The selection of an euploid embryo using PGT-A, offers theoretical advantages including increased implantation rate, reduced abortion rate, and reduces the time to achieve an ongoing pregnancy.

Certain advances in ART such as vitrification or improvement in culture media makes safer the PGT-A procedure. As a result of these improvements, embryo biopsy has been driven from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage for preimplantional genetic testing for aneuploidy analysis (PGT-A 2.0) and it is now the method of choice for PGT-A in many centers. Trophectoderm biopsy presents advantages over the use of blastomere biopsy: 1. It allows obtaining around 6-10 cells without reducing the potential for pre-embryo development or its ability to implant. 2. Greater strength in the results, since it reduces false diagnoses associated with factors such as mosaicism. 3. It allows a combined study for monogenic mutations, aneuploidy screening and / or structural alterations.

The frequency of inconclusive results in PGT-A varies depending on the embryonic stage used, with values of 9-10% of the total embryos analyzed for single blastomere biopsy and between 2-6% when trophectoderm cells are biopsied.

These inconclusive results, mainly in couples without euploid embryos available to transfer, cause them uncertainty and disappointment. In these situations, it is advisable to guide patients in making decisions about what to do with these pre-embryos through genetic counselling. Patients must decide if they wish to reject them, to transfer them without the certainty of a reliable diagnosis or to re-analyze them. Scientific literature reporting these types of inconclusive results and that give advice about its possible etiology are scarce. There is no clear evidence about the impact of double biopsy, double vitrification-warming or if transferring embryos with inconclusive results, is safe for achieving a healthy newborn. The objective of this review is to learn from the published studies about the safety of embryo re-analysis and its potential reproductive outcome when there are embryos with inconclusive results after PGT, in order to offer adequate counselling for patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 43 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with indication of PGT-A (advanced maternal age, male factor, recurrent pregnancy loss, recurrent implantation failure, previous aneuploidy pregnancy) with differed single embryo transfer.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cycles of embryo transfer from patients with at least one euploid embryo (no rebiopsy group):
  • Women age 18-45 years.
  • PGT-A Indication.
  • All embryos with informative results.
  • Women age 18-45 years.
  • PGT-A Indication.
  • At least one embryo result with lack of diagnosis.
  • At least one rebiopsied embryo.
  • At least one euploid result from rebiopsied embryo.
  • Single embryo transfer.

Exclusion Criteria:

Double embryo transfer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cycles of embryo transfer from patients with at least one euploid embryo (no rebiopsy group)
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Rebiopsy group:
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implantation rate
Time Frame: Since July 2019 to December 2020
Analyze implantation rate in the groups
Since July 2019 to December 2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 21, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011-VGO-095-EM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Embryo Disorder

Clinical Trials on Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

3
Subscribe