Effects of a Dementia-friendly Program

January 29, 2021 updated by: Nina Mickelson Weldingh, University Hospital, Akershus

Effects of a Dementia-friendly Program on Detection and Management of Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Delirium in Acute-care Hospital Units: a Non-equivalent Control Group Design

Frail older persons with cognitive impairment are at special risk of experiencing delirium during acute hospitalisation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a dementia-friendly hospital program contributes to improved detection and management of patients with cognitive impairment and delirium.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Study design This study, has a non-equivalent control group design and a historical control Group. The Control group received usual care and the experimental group received usual care plus the dementia-friendly program.

One Group received care after implementing the dementia-friendly hospital program. The study is performed at two medical wards at a large acute-care hospital in Norway. A medical pulmonary ward and a cardiac ward participated.

Data Collection:

Demographic data included age, gender, place of residence (home, adapted housing, institution), and family/relative network, and were obtained upon admission to the study.

Medical data included cause of admission, active medical diagnoses, medications and medical treatment, and were obtained both at admission and from their electronic medical records after discharge.

Cognitive Impairment and delirium were assessed with two different screening tools: the Four Assessment Test (4AT) and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).

For all patients with a positive 4AT (≥1) or identified cognitive impairment during their hospital stays, a thorough review of the patient's journal was conducted upon discharge to record if, in case of yes, which type of preventive or treatment measures according to the dementia-friendly program, the patients had received during their stays.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

423

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lørenskog, Norway, 1478
        • University Hospital, Akershus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥75 years
  • acute admission to the cardiac or pulmonary wards.
  • Patient who has given informed written consent, or proxy consent from relatives for patients who lacked cognitive capacity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Readmitted patients enrolled in a previous hospital stay.
  • Patients who do not have sufficient verbal function or hearing to communicate
  • Patients in a coma or too ill to participate
  • Patients who are isolated
  • Patients who do not wish to participate or relatives who do not want the patient to participate, in the cases where the patient lacked cognitive capacity to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: The dementia friendly hospital program
The dementia-friendly hospital program comprised three parts; 1) Educational program for health practitioners to increase the staff's knowledge and awareness of patients with cognitive impairment and/or delirium; 2) Screening, for early identification of cognitive impairment and delirium, using the Four Assessment Test (4AT); 3) Delirium risk factor modification and management for patients defined with potential cognitive impairment and risk of delirium, implying that risk factor modifications should be implemented in the patient's care plan. For patients with suspected delirium, the program promoted an additional delirium management plan.
Implementation of a systematic screening and risk modification and management plan, to identify and enhance the management of patients with cognitive impairment and risk of delirium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of patients with cognitive impairment
Time Frame: During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Proportion of patients identified with cognitive impairment during the hospital stay, documented in the electronic Medical record. Difference between the control group and the intervention group. Patients were assessed with The Four Assessment Test at admission and during the stay at the participating wards. Furthermore, documentation of cognitive impairment in the electronic medical journal during the stay were assessed after discharge.
During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Management of patients with cognitive impairment and delirium
Time Frame: During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Proportion of patients identified with cognitive impairment, delirium or at risk of delirium who has documented interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium, according to the implemented dementia-friendly program.Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Screening within 24 hours
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after admission to the ward
Proportion of patients screened with The Four Assessment Test within 24 after hours after admission to the ward. Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Within 24 hours after admission to the ward
Use of antipsychotics, hypnotics and sedatives
Time Frame: During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Proportion of patients with cognitive impairment given doses of antipsychotics, hypnotics and sedatives during the stay at the participating wards. Differences between the control group and the intervention group. Given doses of antipsychotics, hypnotics and sedatives during the stay at the participating wards registered in the electronic medical journal, were assessed after discharge.
During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Use of medications not recommended for the patient group
Time Frame: During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Proportion of patients with cognitive impairment who uses medications which are not recommended for the patient group. Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
During the stay at the participating wards, assessed from the electronical medical record within 6 months after discharge
Departure to rehabilitation or nursing home
Time Frame: Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
Proportion of patients with departure to rehabilitation or nursing home. Departure to care level were assessed from the electronic medical journal after discharge.Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
Mean number of days at the hospital stay.Length of hospital stay were collected from the electronic medical journal after discharge.Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
Delirium
Time Frame: Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
Proportion of patients diagnosed with delirium. Delirium diagnosis documented during the stay at the participating wards were collected from the electronical medical record after discharge. Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Assessed from the electronical medical record, within 6 month after discharge
30-day readmission to the hospital
Time Frame: Readmissions to the hospital were assessed from the electronical medical record 30 days after discharge.
Proportion of patients who are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Readmissions to the hospital were assessed from the electronical medical record 30 days after discharge.
30-day mortality
Time Frame: Mortality were assessed from the electronical medical record 30 days after discharge.
Proportion of mortality in the patient group within 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Differences between the control group and the intervention group.
Mortality were assessed from the electronical medical record 30 days after discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nina M Weldingh, Master, University Hospital, Akershus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium

Clinical Trials on The dementia friendly program

3
Subscribe