Effect of Infraclavicular and Interscalen Block on Oxygenitaon of the Forearm

February 10, 2021 updated by: OZCAN PISKIN, MD, Bulent Ecevit University

Effect of Infraclavicular and Interscalen Block on Oxygenitaon of the Forearm : Randomized Controlled Study.

to research the oxygenitaon effects of infraclavicular and interscalene blocks on the forearm.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To research the oxygenation effects of infraclavicular and interscalen blocks on the forearm by comparing the blood flow (BF) values using the USG, Perfusion index (PI) and Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values using the massimo device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zonguldak, Turkey
        • Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 18-65
  • ASA Score I-III
  • undergoing elective or emergency arm, elbow and forearm surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal for Brachial Plexus Blockage
  • Patients who had any neurological disorders preventing the evaluation of the sensory block in the upper extremity,
  • Infection in the area to be blocked with ICB or ISB,
  • Non-cooperated patients
  • Patients with coagulopathy,
  • Morbidly obese patients
  • Patients with diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with hypertension
  • Patients with peripheral artery disease
  • Patients with allergy to the drugsto be used
  • Patients who had trauma in the area scheduled for the block
  • Paitens who had deterioration of anatomical integrity because of previous surgery
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients whose block failed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Infraclavicular Block
Group I received USG and neurostimulator guided infraclavicular block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
USI and neurostimulator guided infraclavicular block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
Experimental: Interscalen Block
Group II received USG and neurostimulator guided interscalen block. 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
USI and neurostimulator guided interscalen block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
oxygenation of the forearm
Time Frame: during the procedure three times
to compare the oxygenation of the forearm by measuring perfusion index device
during the procedure three times

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eren Açıkgöz, M.D., Bulent Ecevit University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-116-06/12

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Extremity Fracture

Clinical Trials on Infraclavicular Block

3
Subscribe