Pilot Sensor Randomized Controlled Trial: Setting Expectations to Increase Satisfactory Outcomes After Total Knee Replacement (SensorRCT)

February 26, 2024 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute
More than 70,000 total knee replacement procedures are performed annually in Canada, representing a growth of 17% over the past 5 years, with further increases anticipated due to an aging population. While total knee replacement offers improved quality of life for patients and is cost effective for the healthcare system, 20% of patients routinely report dissatisfaction with the procedure. Patient dissatisfaction has been strongly linked to unmet expectations of outcomes after the surgery, especially with respect to physical activity. Counselling patients on appropriate expectations has been suggested as a means to improve satisfaction. Recently, our group has developed a tool to predict the functional ability of an individual patient after total knee replacement. This tool employs machine learning to classify patients as more likely to maintain or improve function, based on a functional test performed in clinic while wearing a sensor system around each knee. Implementing this tool in clinic pre-operatively could assist in setting appropriate expectations for each patient. Our primary objective is to compare patient satisfaction scores at one year after total knee replacement in patients who were informed of their specific expected functional outcome compared to patients who were not informed of their predicted functional outcome. We hypothesize that patients who are given an informed expectation will have higher satisfaction scores. This in turn may decrease health system costs associated with additional clinic visits from dissatisfied patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5A5
        • London Health Science Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior knee surgery
  • inflammatory arthritis
  • neuromuscular disorder that impairs gait
  • scheduled for bilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • Cannot read, write, or speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Outcome Prediction Group
Patient-Specific Prediction of Functional Outcome and Standard Pre-Operative Total Knee Arthroplasty Information
Information sheet that describes whether a patient is more likely to improve on or maintain their current preoperative function.
Standard of care information that is routinely provided at patient preadmission appointments.
Other: Standard Care Group
Standard Pre-Operative Total Knee Arthroplasty Information
Standard of care information that is routinely provided at patient preadmission appointments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Pre-operation, 3-months, and 1-year post-operation
Patients will complete the Knee Society Score (KSS) questionnaire. The primary outcome of interest from the KSS is the satisfaction section. There are five questions related to satisfaction, each with five options ranging from very dissatisfied (0 points) to very satisfied (8 points).
Pre-operation, 3-months, and 1-year post-operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost Effectiveness
Time Frame: At 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported cost diary
At 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, and 1-year post-operation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Knee Inflammation
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation (imaging). Intra-operative (tissue biopsies)
Imaging and tissue biopsies to grade level of inflammation of the knee
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation (imaging). Intra-operative (tissue biopsies)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess pain, stiffness, and function.
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess experience with constant and intermittent pain.
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported scale question to measure global disease activity on a range of 0 (doing very well) to 10 (doing very poorly)
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess self-perceived improvement.
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
EuroQuol 5D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life and is used for economic analysis.
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
UCLA Activity Score
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess activity from range of 1 (completely wholly inactive) to 10 (regularly participates in impact sports).
Pre-operation and 1-year post-operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brent Lanting, Lawson Health Science Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Patient-Specific Prediction of Functional Outcome

3
Subscribe