Efect of Erector Spina Plane Block on Mastectomy

June 16, 2021 updated by: Meliha Orhon, Marmara University

The Effect of Erector Spina Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Opiod Consumption After Mastectomy

After breast cancer surgery, more than 60% of patients experience persistent pain.Although opioids are the main method of use in postoperative pain management, there are side effects such as constipation, sedation, respiratory depression, urinary retention, itching, postoperative nausea and vomiting.Erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a technique used in many surgeries for anesthesia and analgesia.It is frequently preferred by anesthesiologists for postoperative analgesia recently because it is easy to apply and no complications are reported in the literature.ESPB with arms of iliocostalis, longissimus and spinalis, is located parallel to the spine, from the back of the skull to the pelvis.The injected local anesthetic is distributed in many levels in the cranio-caudal direction and blocks the intercostal spinal nerves, causing sensory block.Providing the necessary perioperative analgesia due to the complex innervation of the breast tissue is a big controversy among anesthesiologists.Multimodal analgesia methods with various regional blocks are more preferred.ESPB block is also preferred as another method since it provides both perioperative and postoperative analgesia.In studies conducted on cadavers, it has been shown that local analgesia spreads to the paravertebral area when applied under the Erektor Spina muscle.Technically, compared to the paravertebral block,the ESPB has proven to be more reliable and easier in terms of pleural puncture risk.

ANI is a monitoring method used in the evaluation of acute nociception and pain.Analyzes the instantaneous changes in heart rate due to the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system using respiratory sinus arrhythmia.A value between 0-100 is obtained.If parasympathetic modulation is very low, a value of 0 is obtained, if it is high, a value of 100 is obtained.ANI detects the noxious stimulus more specifically and sensitively than heart rate and blood pressure changes.

Application of anesthesia and having ANI value between 50-70 in the early postoperative period indicates that analgesia is sufficient,and values <50 are the following 10 minutes.Hemodynamic reactivity (20% increase in heart rate or blood pressure) will occur and the level of analgesia is insufficient,and values> 70 indicate that there is no painful stimulus or that more analgesic drugs are used.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After breast cancer surgery, more than 60% of patients experience persistent pain (1). Although opioids are the main method of use in postoperative pain management, there are side effects such as constipation, sedation, respiratory depression, urinary retention, itching, postoperative nausea and vomiting (2). Erector spina plane block (ESP) is a technique used in many surgeries for anesthesia and analgesia. It is frequently preferred by anesthesiologists for postoperative analgesia recently because it is easy to apply and no complications are reported in the literature. Erector spina muscle, with arms of iliocostalis, longissimus and spinalis, is located parallel to the spine, from the back of the skull to the pelvis. The injected local anesthetic is distributed in many levels in the cranio-caudal direction and blocks the intercostal spinal nerves, causing sensory block (3). Providing the necessary perioperative analgesia due to the complex innervation of the breast tissue is a big controversy among anesthesiologists. Multimodal analgesia methods with various regional blocks are more preferred. Erector Spina Plane block is also preferred as another method since it provides both perioperative and postoperative analgesia (4). In studies conducted on cadavers, it has been shown that local analgesia spreads to the paravertebral area when applied under the Erektor Spina muscle. Technically, compared to the paravertebral block, the Erektor Spina block has proven to be more reliable and easier in terms of pleural puncture risk (5).

ANI is a monitoring method used in the evaluation of acute nociception and pain (Figure 2.1). Analyzes the instantaneous changes in heart rate due to the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system using respiratory sinus arrhythmia. A value between 0-100 is obtained. If parasympathetic modulation (stress level eg presence of pain) is very low, a value of 0 is obtained, if it is high, a value of 100 is obtained (7). ANI detects the noxious stimulus more specifically and sensitively than heart rate and blood pressure changes (6).

The "yellow colored value" on the upper right corner of the ANI monitor shows the instantaneous ANI value, while the orange colored one shows the average ANI value in the last 4 minutes. (Figure 2.1). Application of anesthesia and having ANI value between 50-70 in the early postoperative period indicates that analgesia is sufficient, and values <50 are the following 10 minutes. A hemodynamic reactivity (20% increase in heart rate or blood pressure) will occur and the level of analgesia is insufficient, and values> 70 indicate that there is no painful stimulus or that more analgesic drugs are used (6). After breast cancer surgery, more than 60% of patients experience persistent pain (1). Although opioids are the main method of use in postoperative pain management, there are side effects such as constipation, sedation, respiratory depression, urinary retention, itching, postoperative nausea and vomiting (2). Erector spina plane block (ESP) is a technique used in many surgeries for anesthesia and analgesia. It is frequently preferred by anesthesiologists for postoperative analgesia recently because it is easy to apply and no complications are reported in the literature. Erector spina muscle, with arms of iliocostalis, longissimus and spinalis, is located parallel to the spine, from the back of the skull to the pelvis. The injected local anesthetic is distributed in many levels in the cranio-caudal direction and blocks the intercostal spinal nerves, causing sensory block (3). Providing the necessary perioperative analgesia due to the complex innervation of the breast tissue is a big controversy among anesthesiologists. Multimodal analgesia methods with various regional blocks are more preferred. Erector Spina Plane block is also preferred as another method since it provides both perioperative and postoperative analgesia (4). In studies conducted on cadavers, it has been shown that local analgesia spreads to the paravertebral area when applied under the Erektor Spina muscle. Technically, compared to the paravertebral block, the Erektor Spina block has proven to be more reliable and easier in terms of pleural puncture risk (5).

ANI is a monitoring method used in the evaluation of acute nociception and pain (Figure 2.1). Analyzes the instantaneous changes in heart rate due to the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system using respiratory sinus arrhythmia. A value between 0-100 is obtained. If parasympathetic modulation (stress level eg presence of pain) is very low, a value of 0 is obtained, if it is high, a value of 100 is obtained (7). ANI detects the noxious stimulus more specifically and sensitively than heart rate and blood pressure changes (6).

The "yellow colored value" on the upper right corner of the ANI monitor shows the instantaneous ANI value, while the orange colored one shows the average ANI value in the last 4 minutes. (Figure 2.1). Application of anesthesia and having ANI value between 50-70 in the early postoperative period indicates that analgesia is sufficient, and values <50 are the following 10 minutes. A hemodynamic reactivity (20% increase in heart rate or blood pressure) will occur and the level of analgesia is insufficient, and values> 70 indicate that there is no painful stimulus or that more analgesic drugs are used (6).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34854
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

adult female patients ASA 1-3 25-70 years old were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe respiratory and heart disease liver or kidney failure coagulopathy local infection at the injection site spine or chest wall deformity allergy to drugs to be used opioid addiction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: erector spinae plane block group
All patients were monitored with standard monitoring (electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)), bispectral index (BIS, Medtronic, Mineapolis) and ANI (analgesia nociception index) -90-120 min) data were recorded.Group ESPB was applied before general anesthesia by the same anesthesiologist with block experience. In the sitting position, using an ultrasound-guided linear probe (6-13 MHz) on the side to be operated, T3 is marked 3 cm from the lateral of the spinous processes and with the in-plane technique, a 22G block needle (100mm, B-Braun, Germany) in the cranio-caudal direction first After it was observed that the erector spina muscle was separated from the transverse process with -2 ml normal saline, 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 100 mg lidocaine were administered. And the drug was found to spread to the craniocaudal line at the ESP on ultrasound.Postoperative pain of the patients was evaluated using VAS (visual analogue scale).
Erector spina plane block (ESP) is a technique used in many surgeries for anesthesia and analgesia. It is frequently preferred by anesthesiologists for postoperative analgesia recently because it is easy to apply and no complications are reported in the literature. Erector spina muscle, with arms of iliocostalis, longissimus and spinalis, is located parallel to the spine, from the back of the skull to the pelvis. The injected local anesthetic is distributed in many levels in the cranio-caudal direction and blocks the intercostal spinal nerves, causing sensory block. Providing the necessary perioperative analgesia due to the complex innervation of the breast tissue is a big controversy among anesthesiologists. Multimodal analgesia methods with various regional blocks are more preferred. Erector Spina Plane block is also preferred as another method since it provides both perioperative and postoperative analgesia
No Intervention: non block control group
All patients were monitored with standard monitoring (electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)), bispectral index (BIS, Medtronic, Mineapolis) and ANI (analgesia nociception index) -90-120 min) data were recorded.15 minutes before the end of the surgery, 1 gr paracetamol and 100 mg tramadol were given to the control group. Postoperative pain of the patients was evaluated using VAS (visual analogue scale).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: during surgery
measurement with analgesia nosiception index monitor
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative changes in vas ( visual analog scor)
Time Frame: postoperative first 24 hours.
recorde postoperative vas changes by anesthesist
postoperative first 24 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on erector spinae block

3
Subscribe