- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04825210
Integrated Behavioral Health Prevention in Pediatric Primary Care for Infants
September 12, 2022 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a universal prevention program delivered by psychologists in conjunction with pediatric primary care well-child visits.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Integrated behavioral health has emerged as an effective approach to addressing emotional and behavioral health needs of children in the pediatric setting, yet there is little evidence for a standardized model of care for providing universal preventive services in pediatric primary care.
Current models are typically loosely constructed, inconsistently applied, and unspecified.
Our aim is to evaluate a model of care developed to address these gaps.
Integrated Behavioral Health-Prevention (IBH-P) is a collection of clinical strategies and structured approaches designed to promote emotional and behavioral health.
IBH-P is delivered by psychologists in the pediatric setting as part of scheduled well-child visits.
The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in promoting infant self-regulation.
Maternal experience and satisfaction, adherence to well-child visits and immunizations will also be examined.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
160
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English speaking
- Biological mother of a newborn infant presenting at the newborn well-child visit
- Intends to continue to receive infant's pediatric care at one of the three participating clinics over the next year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infant diagnosed as failure to thrive
- Infant exposure to illicit drugs in utero with the exception of THC
- Extensive care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (>7 days)
- Child has other serious medical condition or acute psychosocial circumstances that results in child not receiving medical clearance from the pediatrician or psychologist for randomization
- mother or father of infant has received Building Futures intervention training
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Integrated Behavioral Health - Prevention (IBH-P)
The IBH-P intervention addresses four areas: 1) assessment of emotional and behavioral adjustment, 2) parental education on important supports for emotional and behavioral health, 3) modeling and guidance on nurturing and responsive parenting, and 4) addressing parental concerns about and promoting child self-regulation.
The primary focus of IBH-P is promoting infant self-regulation by teaching mothers how to soothe and calm their baby.
Trauma-informed and relationship building methods are emphasized to acknowledge maternal experiences with violence and adversity and the desire to establish a strong working alliance.
IBH-P is distinguished from Bright Futures through its emphasis on experiential learning, modeling of effective parenting skills, in-session practice and feedback, and proactive problem-solving.
Families in IBH-P will receive all standard care elements of the well-child visit including pediatrician implementation of Bright Futures curriculum.
|
IBH-P consists of 15-30 minute visits with mothers as part of the 1, 2, 4, and 6 month well-child visits.
The intervention is delivered by doctoral level pediatric psychologists that are an integrated member of the primary care team.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 4th Edition
The Bright Futures control condition consists of standard of care in addressing emotional and behavioral health as provided by pediatricians.
Pediatricians will follow the 4th edition of the Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents [pocket guide].
Guidelines are provided for topics to discuss and anticipatory guidance at each well-child visit.
In contrast to IBH-P, there is an emphasis on didactic presentation, teaching mothers about developmental milestones, and responding to questions and concerns.
These include discussions of crying, soothing, and feeding, although self-regulation is not a unifying theme.
|
Bright Futures curriculum will be delivered by the pediatrician as part of the 1, 2, 4 and 6 month well-child visits.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Infant self-regulation
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised Very Short Form is a 36-item measure of three factors, positive affect, negative emotionality, and orienting/regulatory capacity.
Scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores representing greater positive affect, negative emotionality and orienting and regulatory capacity.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Parental knowledge of child development
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory is 58-item measure of caregiver knowledge of infant development.
The total score will be calculated as the percentage of correct answers out of 58 items.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Maternal parenting behaviors
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Keys to Interactive Parenting Scale (KIPS) will be used to assess maternal parenting behaviors.
KIPS is a structured observational measure and assesses 12 domains of parenting.
The domains are scored on a 1 to 5-point scale with higher scores indicating higher quality parenting behaviors.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Parenting beliefs and practices
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Baby Care Questionnaire is a 30-item measure of parenting belief and practices with 2 subscales, structure and attunement.
Total scores range from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater structure and attunement.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Maternal feelings of efficacy in infant care
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Maternal Self-Efficacy Scale is a 10-item self-report of feelings of efficacy in infant care.
The total score will be used and ranges from 10 to 40 with higher scores representing greater maternal self-efficacy.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Maternal appraisement of life stress
Time Frame: 7-month follow-up
|
The Perceived Stress Scale is a 14-item self-report of the degree to which situations in one's life within the past month are appraised as stressful.
Scores range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
|
7-month follow-up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maternal experiences of violence and adversity in childhood
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Philadelphia Urban Adverse Childhood Experiences is a 22-item self-report that will be used to measure maternal experience of childhood violence and adversity.
The total score is a tally of the 22 items endorsed with higher scores indicating more experiences of violence and adversity.
|
Baseline
|
Adherence to well-child visits in first 7 months of life
Time Frame: Infants' birth through 7-months of age
|
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends preventive pediatric care is provided across 5 visits in an infant's first 7 months of life.
Percentage of adherence to the 5 well-child visits will be calculated.
|
Infants' birth through 7-months of age
|
Health Service Utilization - Immunizations
Time Frame: Infants' birth through 5-months of age
|
Completion of immunizations at 5 months
|
Infants' birth through 5-months of age
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert T Ammerman, PhD, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, OH USA
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Putnam SP, Helbig AL, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK, Leerkes E. Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the infant behavior questionnaire-revised. J Pers Assess. 2014;96(4):445-58. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.841171. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
- Bright futures pocket guide (4th ed.). (2017). American Academy of Pediatrics.
- MacPhee D. Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory: Manual. In. Colorado: Colorado State University; 2002.
- Winstanley A, Gattis M. The Baby Care Questionnaire: a measure of parenting principles and practices during infancy. Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):762-75. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- Teti DM, Gelfand DM. Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: the mediational role of maternal self-efficacy. Child Dev. 1991 Oct;62(5):918-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01580.x.
- Pachter LM, Lieberman L, Bloom SL, Fein JA. Developing a Community-Wide Initiative to Address Childhood Adversity and Toxic Stress: A Case Study of The Philadelphia ACE Task Force. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S130-S135. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.012.
- Campo JV, Geist R, Kolko DJ. Integration of Pediatric Behavioral Health Services in Primary Care: Improving Access and Outcomes with Collaborative Care. Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;63(7):432-438. doi: 10.1177/0706743717751668. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
- Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, Peiperl L, Laine C, James A, Hong ST, Haileamlak A, Gollogly L, Godlee F, Frizelle FA, Florenzano F, Drazen JM, Bauchner H, Baethge C, Backus J. Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 4;167(1):63-65. doi: 10.7326/M17-1028. Epub 2017 Jun 6. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
April 13, 2021
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 24, 2022
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 24, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 30, 2021
First Posted (ACTUAL)
April 1, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
September 13, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2022
Last Verified
September 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-1007 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Consistent with the open science movement and with the directive of clinicaltrials.gov
to include a data sharing plan in submissions, we will have the following data sharing policy: we will share with other investigators (1) all individual participant data after deidentification, and (2) study management documents (protocol, statistical analysis plan, consent form, analytic code, data dictionary).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data and supporting information will be made available three months after publication of the primary article and ending five years after publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Those requesting data will be required to submit a proposal to Robert.Ammerman@cchmc.org.
This will be reviewed by the investigative team for methodological soundness and scientific merit before data is shared.
This plan is consistent with guidelines developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (Taichman et al., 2017).
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prevention
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania; National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); Pennsylvania...CompletedPrevention Harmful Effects | Accidents, Traffic | Accident PreventionUnited States
-
Prof Mags BeksinskaCompletedHIV Prevention | Pregnancy PreventionSouth Africa
-
Yale UniversityCompletedHIV Prevention | STI PreventionUnited States
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUniversity of Minnesota; The Fenway Institute; AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts and other collaboratorsCompletedHIV Prevention | STD PreventionUnited States
-
Brown UniversityUniversity of California, Los Angeles; National Institute of Nursing Research... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Apple Inc.American Heart AssociationRecruiting
-
Brown UniversityThe Miriam HospitalCompletedOptimizing PrEP Uptake & Adherence Among Male Sex Workers (MSW) Using a 2-stage Randomization DesignPreventionUnited States
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityUnknown
-
Carnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania; Yale UniversityCompletedPreventionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Integrated Behavioral Health - Prevention
-
University of FloridaJohns Hopkins University; National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedYouths At-risk for Drug Use/AbuseUnited States
-
Health Resources in Action, Inc.Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas, Inc.; Social Innovation FundCompletedDepression | Hypertension | Obesity | Diabetes | Chronic Disease | Hypercholesterolemia
-
Atlanta VA Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Emory... and other collaboratorsRecruitingInsomnia | NocturiaUnited States
-
San Diego State UniversityRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Psychological Distress | Glycemic ControlUnited States
-
Kovacs FoundationHospital Laboral SOLIMATTerminated
-
Changhua Christian HospitalCompletedthe Fall Rates | the Severity of Injuries
-
East Carolina UniversityBristol-Myers SquibbCompletedDepression | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes-related DistressUnited States
-
RTI InternationalBoston University; University of North Carolina, Chapel HillTerminatedImplementation | Adaptation | Crime | Co-occurring Mental and Substance Use Disorders | Criminogenic ThinkingUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSelective MutismUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetErsta DiakoniCompletedCognitive Behavioral Therapy