- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05260294
A Comparison Study Between Contrast Spread and Loss of Resistance Techniques
Identification of Epidural Space: A Comparison Study Between Contrast Spread and Loss of Resistance Techniques
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The study participants were patients of Astoria Pain Management, New York, USA (age 28-72 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculitis. The Canadian SHIELD Ethics Review Board approved this study (July 18, 2019. REB tracking number: 19-06-002), conducted from August 19, 2019, to October 8, 2019. There was no funding for this study. Patients were eligible for the study if they met the criteria for cervical ESI, which included clinical and recent MRI findings confirming the diagnosis of cervical radiculitis and inadequate pain relief with conservative care for more than 3 months. Other criteria were if the procedure was covered by medical insurance, and if they signed informed consent. Patients were excluded from the study if they were taking anticoagulants or had serious comorbidities such as congestive heart failure.
The patients were divided into two groups of 20 each and underwent CESI with either an 18G or a 25G Tuohy needle. The skin was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine in the 18G group but not in the 25G group. All cervical epidurals were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method when the needle was navigated from the skin toward the epidural space under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy [3], and the contrast spread technique [4,5] was employed for epidural space identification. After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK). I utilized the Epidrum device as I consider it a more objective and reproducible method for epidural space identification independent of the provider's skill with the LORT, and because its success rate is comparable to the results attained by trained anesthesiologists employing the LOR syringe [6, 7, 8]. Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, the result was positive. However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative. The collected data was then analyzed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Astoria, New York, United States, 11102
- Astoria Pain Management
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical and recent MRI findings confirming the diagnosis of cervical radiculitis
- Inadequate pain relief with conservative care for more than 3 months
- Signed informed consent
- The procedure was covered by medical insurance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bleeding disorder or anticoagulants therapy
- Serious comorbidities such as congestive heart failure
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Refusal to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 18 Gauge Tuohy group
In the 18G group, all CESIs were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method when the needle was navigated from the skin toward the epidural space under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy, and the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
|
Cervical epidural procedure and epidural space recognition were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method.
With this technique, needle navigation from the skin toward the epidural space is performed under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy.
With the needle at the ventral interlaminar line, the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, thus confirming LOR, the result was positive.
However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative.
The collected data was then analyzed.
|
Active Comparator: 25 Gauge Tuohy group
In the 25G group, all CESIs were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method when the needle was navigated from the skin toward the epidural space under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy, and the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
|
Cervical epidural procedure and epidural space recognition were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method.
With this technique, needle navigation from the skin toward the epidural space is performed under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy.
With the needle at the ventral interlaminar line, the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, thus confirming LOR, the result was positive.
However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative.
The collected data was then analyzed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Confirmation of the LOR with epidurally located 18G Tuohy needle by the Epidrum device.
Time Frame: 30 seconds
|
Cervical epidural procedure and epidural space recognition were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method.
With this technique, needle navigation from the skin toward the epidural space is performed under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy.
With the needle at the ventral interlaminar line, the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, thus confirming LOR, the result was positive.
However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative.
|
30 seconds
|
Confirmation of the LOR with epidurally located 25G Tuohy needle by the Epidrum device.
Time Frame: 30 seconds
|
Cervical epidural procedure and epidural space recognition were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method.
With this technique, needle navigation from the skin toward the epidural space is performed under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy.
With the needle at the ventral interlaminar line, the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification.
After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK).
Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, thus confirming LOR, the result was positive.
However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative.
|
30 seconds
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hoffmann VL, Vercauteren MP, Vreugde JP, Hans GH, Coppejans HC, Adriaensen HA. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):807-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.807.
- Doan L, Patel H, Aronova Y, Gharibo C. Variations in Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Practice Patterns by Interventional Pain Management Physicians in the United States. Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):E493-E499.
- Furman MB, Jasper NR, Lin HW. Fluoroscopic contralateral oblique view in interlaminar interventions: a technical note. Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1389-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01484.x. Epub 2012 Sep 19. Erratum In: Pain Med. 2013 Oct;14(10):1614. Furman, Michael [corrected to Furman, Michael B].
- Perper Y. Contrast spread technique. Pain Med. 2015 Apr;16(4):827-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12650. Epub 2015 Feb 4. No abstract available.
- Perper Y. Contrast Spread Technique: Evolution. Pain Med. 2016 Jul;17(7):1385-1386. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv100. Epub 2016 Feb 5. No abstract available.
- Kartal S, Kosem B, Kilinc H, Kosker H, Karabayirli S, Cimen NK, Demircioglu RI. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;20(8):992-997. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.214366.
- Kim SW, Kim YM, Kim SH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum(R) and conventional method for identifying the epidural space. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Apr;62(4):322-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.4.322. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
- Sawada A, Kii N, Yoshikawa Y, Yamakage M. Epidrum((R)): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle. J Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):292-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1278-1. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-06-002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neck Pain
-
Fatih TekinPamukkale UniversityCompletedChronic Neck Pain | Persistent Neck Pain | Neuroscience ApproachTurkey
-
Jeff Elias, MDRecruitingCancer of Head and Neck | Pain, Neck | Pain, FaceUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingNeck Pain | Cervical Pain | Neck Pain, Posterior | Neck Muscle Issue | Cervical Pain, PosteriorTurkey
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedCervical Pain | Mechanical Neck PainPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Instituto Brasileiro de OsteopatiaCompletedNeck Pain | Pain, NeckBrazil
-
Ankara UniversityCompleted
-
Josue Fernandez CarneroCentro Universitario La SalleCompleted
-
Sakarya UniversityUnknown
-
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineBeijing Hospital; Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing; Traditional Chinese Medicine... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Epidural space identification with cervical epidural steroid injection employing CST and LORT.
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalUnknownNeck Pain | Head Pain | Upper Extremity PainKorea, Republic of
-
Marmara UniversityRecruiting
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSeoul National University HospitalUnknownWhiplash Injury | Herniated Nucleus PulposusKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedLow Back PainKorea, Republic of
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySeoul National University; Washington DC VA Medical CenterCompletedCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical Radicular PainUnited States, Korea, Republic of
-
King Edward Medical UniversityCompletedPostoperative PainPakistan
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterWithdrawnCervical Radiculopathy
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedPain, Chronic | Pain, Neck | Pain, MyofacialTurkey
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedPain, Radiating | Cervical Radiculopathy | Pain, NeckTurkey
-
University of WashingtonUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Massachusetts General Hospital; Mayo Clinic; Oregon... and other collaboratorsCompletedLow Back Pain | Spinal StenosisUnited States