Comparison of Pelvimetric Measurements Between MRI and Low-dose Stereoradiography (EOS® Imaging System) (CAPEOS®)

August 24, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
The main objective of this study is to compare pelvimetric measurements performed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and by the EOS imaging system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

During pregnancy, after failure of External Manual Version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation, a radiological pelvimetry is performed to evaluate the measurements of the pelvis and decide on the appropriate mode of delivery.

Several imaging modalities are used, including pelvic computed tomography (CT),and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis.

CT scan has the disadvantage of maternal irradiation and MRI has the disadvantage of an inaccurate morphological analysis.The EOS® system is an imaging tool used in radiopediatric to allow precise morphological analysis of bone masses with minimal irradiation.

The quality of the morphological analysis and measurements provided by the EOS® imaging system is the reason for proposing this study comparing the pelvimetric measurements obtained by MRI and by the EOS® imaging system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Pr Riethmuller Didier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years of age
  • Patient requiring pelvimetry (breech fetus)
  • Gestation > 36 SA (weeks of amenorrhea)
  • Patients with BMI < 35
  • Affiliated to social security or similarly regime
  • Patients who gave their consent to participate in the study (Patient having agreed to perform both examinations: MRI and EOS system)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, pace-maker, intracorporeal metallic element)
  • Patient with a contraindication to performing EOS® (person not standing alone)
  • Patient who are in exlusion period of another interventiionnal study
  • Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision; person hospitalized for psychitric care; person under legal protection measure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pelvimetry group
The participants oh this group will successively perform MRI pelvimetry and EOS imaging.
The patients in this group are pregnant women after failure of external manual version (EMV) in case of breech fetal presentation. The participants will successively perform MRI pelvimetry (conventional management) and EOS imaging.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Transverse Inlet Diameter measurement
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Transverse Inlet Diameter Measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Up to 1 day
Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using ante posterior diameter measurement
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Ante posterior diameter of the pelvic inlet obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Up to 1 day
Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using BiSpinous Diameter measurement
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
BiSpinous Diameter obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Up to 1 day
Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Bi-ischiatic mesurement
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Bi-ischiatic measurement obtained by EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Up to 1 day
Estimation of the reliability of pelvimetric measurements using Magin's Index calculation
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Magnin's Index calculation obtained by using EOS® system versus MRI is evaluated in millimeters.
Up to 1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvis morphological description using Cadwell and Moloy classification
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Caldwell and Moloy classification (scale) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Up to 1 day
Pelvis morphological description using subpubic angle measurement
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
The measurement of the subpubic angle (in degree) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Up to 1 day
Pelvis morphological description using obturating holes appearance
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
The appearance of the obturating holes (descriptive analysis) obtained by MRI and EOS® system is qualified.
Up to 1 day
Characterization of radiation doses received by EOS® system.
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Estimation of irradiation
Up to 1 day
Evaluation of the intra and inter-observer reproducibility for radiological interpretation
Time Frame: 4 days
Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two radiologists on two different days.
4 days
Evaluation of the intra and inter-observer reproducibility for clinical interpretation
Time Frame: 4 days
Blind independent reading of MRI and EOS® images by two independent clinician on two different days with conclusion on the mode of delivery.
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Didier R RIETHMULLER, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breech Fetal Presentation

Clinical Trials on Pelvimetric measurements

3
Subscribe