Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

November 7, 2022 updated by: Umeå University

Impaired Swallowing Function After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery- Incidence, Long-term Effect on Nutrition and Effect of Oral Neuromuscular Training

The purpose of this research project is to investigate the incidence of impaired swallowing (dysphagia) after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) and to study the long-term effect of dysphagia on nutritional status 12 ± 3 months later. Furthermore, to investigate the effect of a new rehabilitation method for dysphagia among individuals with swallowing dysfunction after ACSS.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study design: This study contains of two parts. The first part of this study is a prospective observational cohort study with consecutive observations on the characterization of incidence of and factors related to dysphagia after ACSS (within 14 days of surgery and 2-3 weeks later), and investigation the long-term effect of dysphagia on nutritional status 12 ± 3 months later.

The second part of this study is a prospective randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluators (PROBE-design) that compare conventional care to neuromuscular training in the treatment of dysphagia.

Subjects and procedure: Part 1: All patients enrolled at the University Hospital of Umeå who have undergone ACSS between C2 and Th1 level due to trauma are eligible participants in the first part of the study (the observational cohort study). All participants will have their swallowing function assessed with a flexible video endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (i.e. FESS) within 14 days after surgery and have their nutritional status examined with the clinical test Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) and blood sample for biomarkers of malnutrition (i.e., levels of Albumin, levels of Leptin, Ghrelin and Adiponektin and also metabolites as ketone bodies (3 hydoxibutyrat and acetoacetate). The swallowing assessment and nutritional screening with NRS-2002 will be performed by a speech- language pathologist or physician in otolaryngology. Blood sample will be collected by a nurse at the unit where the participant is staying, who have extended knowledge in the procedure. If a swallowing dysfunction is present the patient will be followed-up within 2-3 weeks later (i.e., 4±1- week post-operation) to assess the spontaneous recovery. During the period from the first assessment to the follow-up all patients will be given conventional care (e.g., postural adjustments, swallowing maneuvers, modified consistency of solid and/or liquid food). If the patient has a remaining swallowing dysfunction at the reassessment 4±1-week post-operation the patient will be asked to participate in part 2 of the study (the interventional study). All patients participating in part 1, will have another examination of nutritional status at 12 ± 3 months after ACSS. In order to study the long-term effect of dysphagia on nutrition.

Part 2: Participants with presenting swallowing dysfunction at the reassessment 4±1 week post- operation will after given their oral or written consent be randomly assigned to 8 weeks of either conventional care (control group) or oral neuromuscular training with an oral device (intervention group). Randomization will be performed web-based using the program MINIM with minimization/ stratification for aspiration (yes/no) on FEES leading to an equal balance of prognostic important variable at baseline. In each group, swallowing function, swallowing-related quality of life measured by the Swallowing Quality of life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) and an examination of nutritional status with the clinical screening NRS-2002 and blood samples will be assessed at baseline (i.e. 4±1 week post-surgery assessment), eight weeks after baseline (end-of treatment), and 12 ± 3 months post-treatment. A swallowing assessment will also be performed four weeks into the treatment period. If oral neuromuscular training with an oral device is found to be effective in the intervention group, it will be also offered to the control group after the study is finished. All assessments will be carried out at the University Hospital of Umeå. All the assessments of the participants' swallowing function will be recorded, and the evaluators will be blinded to treatment at the assessment of the FEES.

Clinical data will be obtained from the participants' journal part 1 and 2 regarding sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), presence of a tracheostomy and if presence what type of tube used, length of intubation, presence of pneumonia, length stay at the hospital or ICU, medical diagnoses, the severity of the spinal cord injury according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, level of spinal cord injury and whether left or right approach was used during the ACSS will be recorded. Prior to the first assessment of the participant's swallowing function, written or oral (if tetraplegia) consent will be collected from each patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients enrolled at the University Hospital of Umeå who have undergone ACSS between C2 and Th1 level due to trauma are eligible participants in the first part of the study.
  • Eligibility criteria to participate in part 2 is swallowing dysfunction on FEES at 4±1-week post-operation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients <18 years of age
  • known dysphagia prior to the trauma/injury
  • affected brainstem that is shown on a CT or MRI
  • severe brain damage.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention group
Intensive training with oral neuromuscular device (intervention group) and traditional compensatory swallowing training under 8 weeks with start 4 (±1) weeks post-operation.
The oral device is used for 30 seconds, three times a day, before meals and implies new possibilities for training of the orofacial and pharyngeal muscles.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Traditional compensatory swallowing training under 8 weeks with start 4 (±1) weeks post-operation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysphagia severity
Time Frame: At start, at 4 weeks into the training, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Change in swallowing function measured by FEES.
At start, at 4 weeks into the training, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Swallowing ability
Time Frame: At start, at 4 weeks into the training, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Change in swallowing ability measured by the FOIS (functional oral intake scale)
At start, at 4 weeks into the training, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Swallowing related quality of life
Time Frame: At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Change in quality of life related to swallowing measured by the SWAL-QOL questionnaire.
At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Nutritional status
Time Frame: At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Changes in nutritional status measured by the NRS-2002
At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Nutritional and metabolic status
Time Frame: At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
Changes in nutritional status measured by blood samples (i.e., levels of Albumin, levels of Leptin, Ghrelin and Adiponektin and also metabolites as ketone bodies)
At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
The frequency of pneumonia
Time Frame: At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention
The frequency of pneumonia will be will be registered and compared between the intervention and control group.
At start, at end of treatment (after 8 weeks) and 12 ± 3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patricia Hägglund, PhD/SLP, Umea University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Clinical Trials on Oral neuromuscular training

3
Subscribe