- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04858789
The Effectiveness of a CA-CBI on Psychological Distress of University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Effectiveness of a Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention to Reducing Psychological Distress and Improving Well-Being Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rapid increase in the COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 related deaths were followed by several precautions including the daily usage of masks, social distancing, temporary closure of work places, government departments, schools and universities. Due to these adversities and necessary precautions, people experience psychological distress and symptoms of depression and anxiety during the pandemic. Research shows that university students are at risk for developing psychological distress and common mental health disorder symptoms, and providing psychological interventions for university students may decrease the mental health problems of the students. However, considering the social distancing, these interventions must be delivered online. There are some studies indicate that online interventions may be effective as face-to-face interventions. Considering the mental health support need that the university students have during COVID-19, addressing this need may be beneficial for the mental health of university students in these uncertain times. There are various studies that showed the effectiveness of various form of interventions and one of them is Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral (CA-CB) intervention developed by Hinton. CA-CB interventions were tested with adolescents and women in Turkey and found to decrease the psychological symptoms of these people. CA-CB interventions are based on the cognitive behavioral approach's principles but also include emotion regulation techniques, mindfulness and stretching exercises.
The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial in which they aim to apply a preventive culturally adapted cognitive behavioral intervention (CA-CBI) which is adapted to university students and COVID-19 related stressors. After the adaptation process is completed, the investigators will distribute an online survey to university students for the recruitment. The university students who would like to participate in the intervention study and are eligible to participate will be included. The investigators will randomly assign them into two arms (control and CA-CBI) and then deliver CA-CBI in a group format to the intervention arm. The investigators will examine whether the psychological distress levels and common mental health problems of the students in the intervention arm is decreased compared to the control arm. The investigators will examine the study outcomes of the both arms at three times: Pre-assessment (1 week before the intervention), post-assessment (1 week after the intervention) and follow-up assessment (1 month after the post-assessment). A process evaluation according to the WHO will be completed with 5 study completers, 5 drop-outs and 2 facilitators to evaluate the feasibility of delivering CA-CBI.
Although the CA-CBI was delivered in Turkey to different populations before, it was not tested with university students yet. In addition, there are scarce publications on the online delivered group interventions and to our knowledge, there is neither such research conducted during the pandemic nor research about the efficacy of online synchronous interventions in Turkey. The investigators will contribute to the literature by adapting CA-CBI to the university students who are affected from COVID-19. In addition, they will also add to the literature on online interventions by delivering CA-CBI online in a group format.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ceren Acartürk, Assoc. Prof.
- Phone Number: 1043 90 212 338
- Email: cacarturk@ku.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Koç University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being 18 years or above
- Being a university student
- Scoring 16 or above on Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
- Scoring 14 or belove on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being older than 30 years
- Imminent suicidal risk
- Living outside of Turkey
- Having any type of psychiatric disorder
- Receiving any specialized psychological or psychiatric treatment at the time of application to the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI)
The experimental group will receive an 8-session CA-CBI in an online group format.
|
CA-CBI is an intervention based on Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CA-CBT) which was developed by Devon Hinton.
This transdiagnostic intervention has a structured manual which can be culturally adapted and it will be used to decrease psychological distress and increase well-being by targeting cognitive and behavioral changes.
|
No Intervention: Control
The control (care as usual) group will receive the information about freely available psychological support options.
After all the measurements are completed, the control group will be able to receive CA-CBI, too.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of changes of the Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale is a 10-item scale that aims to measure the psychological distress.
Each item is scored from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time) providing a range between 10 and 50.
Higher scores indicate more severe psychological distress.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of changes of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that aims to measure anxiety symptoms.
Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) providing a range between 0 and 21.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety symptoms
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
Comparison of changes of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
Patient Health Questionnaire is a 9-item questionnaire that aims to measure the depressive symptoms.
Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) providing a range between 0 and 27.
Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
Comparison of changes of the PTSD Checklist for The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM 5) (PCL-5) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 is a 20-item questionnaire that assesses the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) providing a range between 0 and 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of PTSD symptoms.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
Comparison of changes of the World Health Organization (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
The World Health Organization (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a 5-item questionnaire that aims to measure well-being.
Each item is scored from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time) providing a range between 0 and 25.
Higher scores indicate better well-being.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of changes of the Dispositional Hope Scale over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
The Dispositional Hope Scale is a 12-item questionnaire that aims to measure the dispositional hope.
Each item is scored from 1 (definitely false) to 8 (definitely true) providing a range between 8 and 96.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of dispositional hope.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
Comparison of changes of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is a 10-item questionnaire that aims to measure individual differences in emotion regulation and its strategies.
Each item is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) providing a range between 10 and 70.
It has two subscales which are re-appraisal and suppression.
Higher scores indicate more frequent use of these strategies.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
|
8. Comparison of changes of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) over time
Time Frame: Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II is a 7-item questionnaire that aims to measure psychological flexibility.
Each item is scored from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true) providing a range between 7 and 49.
Higher scores indicate less psychological flexibility.
|
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Ekin Çakır, PhD Student, Koç University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Huang J, Nigatu YT, Smail-Crevier R, Zhang X, Wang J. Interventions for common mental health problems among university and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;107:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
- Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
- Hinton DE, Chhean D, Pich V, Safren SA, Hofmann SG, Pollack MH. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy for Cambodian refugees with treatment-resistant PTSD and panic attacks: a cross-over design. J Trauma Stress. 2005 Dec;18(6):617-29. doi: 10.1002/jts.20070.
- Hinton DE, Pham T, Tran M, Safren SA, Otto MW, Pollack MH. CBT for Vietnamese refugees with treatment-resistant PTSD and panic attacks: a pilot study. J Trauma Stress. 2004 Oct;17(5):429-33. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048956.03529.fa.
- Vindegaard N, Benros ME. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 May 30.
- Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
- Acarturk ZC, Abuhamdeh S, Jalal B, Unaldi N, Alyanak B, Cetinkaya M, Gulen B, Hinton D. Culturally adapted transdiagnostic CBT for SSRI resistant Turkish adolescents: A pilot study. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2019;89(2):222-227. doi: 10.1037/ort0000310. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020.465.IRB3.184
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress
-
Utah State UniversityRecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Flexibility | Psychological Well-BeingUnited States
-
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"RecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Intervention | University StudentsItaly
-
Gunther MeinlschmidtRecruitingPsychological DistressGermany
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Recruiting
-
University of WaterlooActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressCanada
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressTurkey
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Military Suicide Research ConsortiumCompletedPsychological DistressUnited States
-
University of ZurichFreie Universität BerlinTerminatedPsychological DistressSwitzerland, Germany
-
Combat StressRoyal British LegionCompletedPsychological DistressUnited Kingdom
-
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesUniversity of Oslo; University of Tromso; Norwegian Medical AssociationUnknown
Clinical Trials on Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI)
-
Koç UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Anxiety | Depressive Symptoms | Psychological DistressTurkey
-
Koç UniversityRecruitingDepressive Symptoms | Psychological Distress | Well-Being, PsychologicalTurkey
-
Pakistan Association of Cognitive TherapistsCompleted
-
Claremont McKenna CollegeUniversity of California, Los AngelesCompleted
-
University of UtahNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Hospital Civil de GuadalajaraUniversity of GuadalajaraUnknownEnd-Stage Renal DiseaseMexico
-
Pakistan Institute of Living and LearningRecruitingBinge-Eating Disorder | Bulimia Nervosa | Eating DisordersPakistan
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Pakistan Institute of Living and LearningUniversity of Manchester; Dow University of Health Sciences; Abbasi Shaheed HospitalCompleted
-
Istanbul Sehir UniversityCompletedPsychological Distress | Psychological TraumaTurkey