- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06017414
Systemic Psychotherapy-informed Self-help and Paraprofessional Training in a Naturalistic Setting
The main goal of this project is to address several gaps in the current literature in an exploratory way, by generating data via a synthesized research design. There are three fields of research this project seeks to have a meaningful impact on: the digital implementation of systemic psychotherapy-informed principles and approaches into unguided self-help growth paths, the training of paraprofessional mental health service providers with systemic psychotherapy-informed listener training, and the utilization of paraprofessional mental health service providers in the delivery of online guided systemic psychotherapy-informed self-help interventions.
This impact will be derived from addressing the following research questions:
- Are online self-help interventions based on systemic psychotherapy approaches and principles feasible?
- Are online self-help interventions based on systemic psychotherapy approaches and principles efficacious (as compared to a waitlist), indicated by mental-health-related outcomes of participants?
- Is training of paraprofessionals in guiding the use of self-help interventions based on systemic psychotherapy approaches and principles feasible?
- Is this training of paraprofessionals based on systemic psychotherapy approaches and principles efficacious (as compared to a waitlist), indicated by mental-health-related outcomes of trainees?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Pieter E Erasmus, M.A.
- Phone Number: +48 530 728 373
- Email: pieter.erasmus@ipu-berlin.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Prof. Dr. Meinlschmidt
- Phone Number: 710 +49 30 300 117
- Email: gunther.meinlschmidt@ipu-berlin.de
Study Locations
-
-
Brandenburg
-
Berlin, Brandenburg, Germany, 10555
- Recruiting
- International Psychoanalytic University Berlin
-
Contact:
- Prof. Dr. Meinlschmidt, PhD
- Phone Number: 710 +49 30 300 117
- Email: gunther.meinlschmidt@ipu-berlin.de
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have been signed up on the 7Cups platform as a member or listener for a minimum of 3 months.
- The intended 7Cups member is "anyone who wants to talk about whatever is on their mind" and the intended 7Cups listener is anyone who does the basic training and "wants to listen to members" (https://www.7cups.com/about/), including given consent to data use.
- Have actively used the 7Cups platform as a member or listener by logging into the platform at least once in the last 2 weeks.
- Agree to participate in our study and provide consent to data usage.
- Aged 18 years or above.
- English language (sufficient capacity to interact with the 7Cups platform and participate in the assessments).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to consent with data use.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Growth Path Intervention
Participants for this arm are members of the 7 Cups platform (signed up as 'members', but not signed up as 'listeners') who will receive the Systemic Psychotherapy-informed growth path intervention.
|
A self-guided program lasting 5 weeks on the 7 Cups platform.
The self-help intervention aims to support members to explore their relationships, situations, and goals.
|
No Intervention: Waitlist followed by Growth Path Intervention
Participants for this arm are members of the 7 Cups platform (signed up as 'members', but not signed up as 'listeners').
The waitlist comparator condition has 7 Cups access and use as usual during the waitlist period.
Participants will receive access to the Systemic Psychotherapy-informed growth path intervention after the waitlist condition of 7 weeks is completed.
|
|
Experimental: Listener Training Intervention
Participants for this arm are listeners on the 7 Cups platform (signed up as 'listeners', but not signed up as 'members') who will receive the Systemic Psychotherapy-informed listener training intervention.
|
A self-guided program lasting 5 weeks on the 7 Cups platform.
The self-help intervention encourages listeners to explore their relationships, situations, and goals and think about how they would support members working through their own relationships, situations, and goals.
|
No Intervention: Waitlist followed by Listener Training Intervention
Participants for this arm are listeners on the 7 Cups platform (signed up as 'listeners', but not signed up as 'members').
The waitlist comparator condition has 7 Cups access and use as usual during the waitlist period.
Participants will receive access to the Systemic Psychotherapy-informed listener training intervention after the waitlist condition of 7 weeks is completed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 6 (K6) (Short version of the K10) (Cornelius et al., 2013; Kessler et al., 2002).
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
The K6 is a standardized self-reported outcome assessment tool used to measure global non-specific psychological distress with questions relating to depressive and anxiety symptoms.
The K6 consists of 6 items asking people to rate their emotional states on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ''All the time'' to ''None of the time''.
Scores are summed and yield a score of 0 to 24.
Higher scores indicate increased non-specified psychological distress.
|
Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4) (Short version of the PSS-10) (Warttig et al., 2013).
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
The PSS-4 is a standardized patient-reported outcome assessment tool used to measure global perceptions of stress from the individual's perspective.
The PSS-4 consists of 4 items asking people to evaluate their experience of stressful situations on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'never' to 'very often'.
Scores are summed and yield a score of 0 to 16.
The higher the score on the PSS-4, the greater the person evaluates that the stressful situations are beyond their ability to deal with them.
|
Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2003).
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
The PHQ-4 consists of the first two items of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, respectively.
This comprises the two principal DSM items for major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively.
Each ranges from a score of 0 to 6.
The PHQ-4 uses a on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 'not at all' to 'nearly every day'.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms.
|
Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (MDMQ, good-bad subscale) (English-language version of MDBF) (Steyer, Schwenkmezger, Notz, & Eid, 1997).
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
The MDBF measures participant current mood (good-bad).
The MDBF uses a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 'definitely not' to 'extremely'.
Scores are summed, yielding a total score of 4 to 24.
Higher scores indicate higher good mood scores.
|
Intervention condition is measured before, directly after, and 2 weeks after the 5 week intervention. Waitlist condition is measured at parallel timepoints, then receives the intervention and follows the intervention condition measurement time frame.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Usability Metric for User Experience Questionnaire (UMUX-LITE) (Finstad, 2010)
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured after the 5 week intervention (Intervention condition only).
|
Assesses the Usability of the intervention delivery.
The UMUX-LITE uses a 7-point Likert scale.
Item responses are recoded to compute a score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate increased ratings of the system's capabilities and ease of use.
|
Intervention condition is measured after the 5 week intervention (Intervention condition only).
|
Qualitative questionnaire.
Time Frame: Intervention condition is measured after the 5 week intervention (Intervention condition only).
|
By using Revicki (2003), Ghani (2015) and Johnson et al. (2011) as guidance a set of questions were designed to get further information and details about the experience and quality of the intervention.
Example questions include: What would improve the growth path or listener training for you?
|
Intervention condition is measured after the 5 week intervention (Intervention condition only).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gunther Meinlschmidt, PhD, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006074.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613.
- Fairburn CG, Patel V. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012.
- Karyotaki E, Riper H, Twisk J, Hoogendoorn A, Kleiboer A, Mira A, Mackinnon A, Meyer B, Botella C, Littlewood E, Andersson G, Christensen H, Klein JP, Schroder J, Breton-Lopez J, Scheider J, Griffiths K, Farrer L, Huibers MJ, Phillips R, Gilbody S, Moritz S, Berger T, Pop V, Spek V, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):351-359. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044.
- Warttig SL, Forshaw MJ, South J, White AK. New, normative, English-sample data for the Short Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). J Health Psychol. 2013 Dec;18(12):1617-28. doi: 10.1177/1359105313508346. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
- Andersson G. Internet interventions: Past, present and future. Internet Interv. 2018 Apr 6;12:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
- Baumel A, Tinkelman A, Mathur N, Kane JM. Digital Peer-Support Platform (7Cups) as an Adjunct Treatment for Women With Postpartum Depression: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Feb 13;6(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9482.
- Cornelius BL, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Brouwer S. The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants. BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 12;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-128.
- Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA. Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):700-707. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268. Erratum In: JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 17;: JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):180.
- Finstad K. The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with computers. 2010; 22(5): 323-327. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
- Ghani MA, Brown SE, Khan F, Wickersham JA, Lim SH, Dhaliwal SK, Kamarulzaman A, Altice FL. An exploratory qualitative assessment of self-reported treatment outcomes and satisfaction among patients accessing an innovative voluntary drug treatment centre in Malaysia. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
- Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG). (24.05.2017). Bericht Nr. 513, Systemische Therapie bei Erwachsenen als Psychotherapieverfahren, Abschlussbericht, Auftrag N14-02, Version 1.0; https://www.iqwig.de/download/n14-02_abschlussbericht_systemische-therapie-bei-erwachsenen_v1-0.pdf(accessed 01.09.2021)
- Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Pedersen L, Groenvold M. Development and initial validation of the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire for self-assessment of palliative needs in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1025-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.013. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
- Karyotaki E, van Ballegooijen W. Digital self-help interventions for suicidal ideation and behaviour. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30215-8. Epub 2019 Nov 29. No abstract available.
- Messner, E. M., & Feikes, K. I. (2021). Systemische Therapie goes online. Psychotherapeut, 66, 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-021-00544-z
- Naslund JA, Shidhaye R, Patel V. Digital Technology for Building Capacity of Nonspecialist Health Workers for Task Sharing and Scaling Up Mental Health Care Globally. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2019 May/Jun;27(3):181-192. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000217.
- Pauley D, Cuijpers P, Papola D, Miguel C, Karyotaki E. Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness. Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):567-579. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001999. Epub 2021 May 28.
- Revicki DA. Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues. Gut. 2004 May;53 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv40-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.034322.
- Sin J, Galeazzi G, McGregor E, Collom J, Taylor A, Barrett B, Lawrence V, Henderson C. Digital Interventions for Screening and Treating Common Mental Disorders or Symptoms of Common Mental Illness in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e20581. doi: 10.2196/20581.
- Steyer, R., Schwenkmezger, P., Notz, P. und Eid, M. (1997). Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Torok M, Han J, Baker S, Werner-Seidler A, Wong I, Larsen ME, Christensen H. Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e25-e36. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30199-2. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IPU_ST_2023_05
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress
-
Utah State UniversityRecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Flexibility | Psychological Well-BeingUnited States
-
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"RecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Intervention | University StudentsItaly
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Recruiting
-
University of WaterlooActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressCanada
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressTurkey
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Military Suicide Research ConsortiumCompletedPsychological DistressUnited States
-
University of ZurichFreie Universität BerlinTerminatedPsychological DistressSwitzerland, Germany
-
Combat StressRoyal British LegionCompletedPsychological DistressUnited Kingdom
-
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesUniversity of Oslo; University of Tromso; Norwegian Medical AssociationUnknown
-
Fondation Santé des Étudiants de FranceRecruitingPsychological DistressFrance
Clinical Trials on Systemic Psychotherapy-informed Growth Path
-
University of LethbridgeCompletedCovid19 | Stress, Psychological | Addiction | Mental Health Wellness 1Canada
-
University of LethbridgeCompletedStress, Psychological | Mental Health Wellness 1 | Eating Behavior | Eating HabitCanada
-
Neuropsychiatric Hospital dr Ivan BarbotActive, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety | Mental Health Disorder | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Panic DisorderCroatia
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingRectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Hepatic MetastasesUnited States
-
Hospices Civils de LyonUnknown
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage 0 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Stage I Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis | Stage I Small Lymphocytic LymphomaUnited States
-
Dutch Colorectal Cancer GroupHoffmann-La RocheCompletedRectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Primary TumourNetherlands, Denmark
-
Koen RoversHoffmann-La Roche; Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands; Dutch Cancer...RecruitingColorectal Cancer | Peritoneal Neoplasms | Colorectal Neoplasm | Peritoneal Carcinomatosis | Colorectal Carcinoma | Peritoneal Cancer | Peritoneal Metastases | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Colorectal Neoplasms Malignant | Peritoneal Neoplasm Malignant Secondary Carcinomatosis | Peritoneal Neoplasm Malignant...Netherlands, Belgium
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCNovartis; Genentech, Inc.CompletedGlioblastoma MultiformeUnited States
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCPfizerCompletedBreast CancerUnited States