Safety & Feasibility of DSR TherApy in Heart FAiluRe pAtients With Persistent Congestion (SAHARA)

November 7, 2022 updated by: Sequana Medical N.V.

Alfapump® DSR Feasibility Study in Subjects With Persistent Congestion Due to Heart Failure, Resistant to Loop Diuretic Treatment

Feasibility and safety study of the alfapump DSR system in the treatment of volume overloaded heart failure subjects receiving high doses of loop diuretics. Up to 24 subjects will be enrolled in up to 3 centres in Republic of Georgia, and randomized into 2 parallel treatment arms. Once implanted with the alfapump DSR system they will undergo DSR therapy in 2 phases: intensive treatment phase followed by maintenance treatment phase.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The feasibility trial will consist of a 24-subject randomized study in volume overloaded heart failure subjects receiving high dose of loop diuretics. Subjects providing consent for participating in the clinical trial will be screened for eligibility. Once eligibility is confirmed they will be implanted with the alfapump® and a standard peritoneal infusion port. After the implant, the subject will undergo a 40 mg IV furosemide (or 1 mg IV bumetanide) diuretic challenge with timed biospecimen collection. At the start of the study treatment period, the loop diuretics treatment will be stopped. Subjects will be randomized in an unblinded fashion into one of two groups:

  • Group 1 (N= 12) - treatment with a standard dose of SGLT2-inhibitor, combined with DSR treatment (PRN use of loop diuretics)
  • Group 2 (N= 12) - treatment with DSR treatment (PRN use of loop diuretics) Enrolled subjects in both groups will undergo at least two weeks of intensive alfapump® DSR treatment (Phase 1) followed by a maintenance and follow-up period of 16 weeks (Phase 2).

During Phase 1 (this can be an in-patient or an out-patient setting, depending on the local standard of care practices), DSR treatment will be performed in the hospital for each subject with the baseline treatment regimen being 1L 10% dextrose (DSR infusate) with a two-hour dwell time. During this phase 1 period, there will be 2 subsequent treatment intensities: Phase 1a) Active weight reduction and Phase 1b) Weight stabilization. The active weight reduction phase (phase 1a) will start with 3 consecutive daily DSR treatment visits in all subjects. Three consecutive daily visits are required to determine the subsequent DSR treatment frequency and dose. Prior to each planned DSR treatment, the subject is evaluated (weight, vital signs, and physical exam) and blood analysis is performed. Pending this evaluation, the next DSR treatment may be held, reduced (down-titrated) or escalated (up-titration) based on the proposed titration guidelines and at the discretion of the study physician. These titration guidelines differ depending on the (sub)treatment phase(s).

Before the end of the 2 intensive weeks (phase 1), many subjects may become already euvolemic and may transition from the active weight loss phase (1a) to the weight stabilization dosing phase (1b). The transition to phase 1b is based on either the resolution of signs and symptoms of volume overload and physician opinion of euvolemia or on the worsening of creatinine by 0.5mg/dL or 1.5x the subject's baseline serum creatinine. The dosing of DSR will employ identical steps as before, but the titration guidelines are adapted in order to stabilize the weight in phase 1b (rather than continue to lose weight).

After 2 weeks of DSR (end of phase 1), the subject's condition will be evaluated via a diuretic challenge before entering the Phase 2 maintenance phase of the study. Transition to Phase 2 is recommended if all of the following criteria are met

  • Clinical euvolemia is achieved (clinical assessment by investigator);
  • Diuretic response during diuretic challenge is >200mmol Na or 50% increase or 50 mmol Na increase from baseline
  • Stable DSR dosing was achieved If these criteria are not met, it is recommended that a 2nd 2-week Phase 1 period is utilized. To ensure ease of enrolment and compliance with the protocol, this is a recommendation rather than a protocol mandate. Up to three 2-week Phase 1 periods (6 weeks total) are allowable per protocol.

During phase 2 all subjects will receive DSR using 1L of D10 in a monthly maintenance treatment session. In case a subject exhibits weight gain greater than 2.5kg or 50% than the weight at the end of Phase 1, loop diuretics (bumetanide, chosen for its short half-life, thus minimizing the time each day the kidney is exposed to loop diuretics) may be started using a proposed dosing schedule. The maintenance phase will last 4 months after subject has started this phase 2. Total maximum study duration (screening until end of phase 2) for each subject will be 6,5 months. During the maintenance period, subjects will be followed weekly (hospital visit or telephone call). Subjects who relapse to congestion state will be undergoing additional active DSR treatment in dose and frequency as deemed required per their clinical needs by treating physician, until decongested state is reached again. In case a subject present with repeat symptoms of volume overload or decongestion, which would necessitate a repeat of phase I treatment, this will not prolong initial 4 months duration of phase 2. The recurrent decongestion will need to be reported as (S)AE and will be followed up until resolution. At the end of the phase 2 phase, each subject undergoes a diuretic challenge to evaluate diuretic response.

At the end of the phase 2 phase, subjects may elect to keep the alfapump® DSR system implanted, in agreement with the investigator. After consenting, subjects can participate in an extended follow-up with or without DSR treatments until the end of the alfapump® DSR system lifecycle (expected maximum 2 years). In other indications (not DSR) where the alfapump® is implanted, an average pump lifecycle of 10 months is observed. During the extended follow up period, no replacement of alfapump®, peritoneal access port or alfapump catheters will be performed.

The objective of the extended follow-up is to collect more long-term safety data. For subjects for whom DSR therapy appears to be offering a benefit, the investigator can elect to offer continued monthly DSR treatment at his/her discretion, in close collaboration with scientific study management team. Subjects participating in this extended follow-up will be asked to perform an additional diuretic challenge every 3 months during the extended FU to evaluate their diuretic response.

Subjects not participating in the proposed study extension as well as subjects who elected to have the alfapump® explanted at the end of the phase 2, will be proposed to participate in a minimal extended follow-up to allow investigator to contact them monthly to gather information only on loop diuretic restart and dose after the end of the study (with a maximum of 1 year after the end of phase 2 treatment period).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0112
        • Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Helsicore
      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159
        • Tbilisi Heart & Vascular Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥18 years of age
  2. Subject has creatinine based eGFR (MDRD or CKD-EPI formula) >30ml/min/1.73m²
  3. Subject is diagnosed with heart failure including the follow-ing:

    1. nt-proBNP > 2000 pg/ml and oral diuretic dose >80mg furosemide (or >20mg torsemide or >1mg bume-tanide)
    2. at least 1 hospitalization due to HF-related volume overload within the year prior to enrolment in the study
    3. at least 2 clinical signs and symptoms of volume over-load
  4. Subject has extravascular volume overload as evidenced by:

    1. Peripheral edema > trace
    2. Known fluid weight gain, or physician estimate of ≥5kg of fluid overload;
  5. Subject has systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg
  6. Subject is able to tolerate surgical implantation of the alfapump using local standard of care anesthesia practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has proteinuria > 1g/l as confirmed by dipstick (≥ +++)
  2. Subject presents an excessive subcutaneous fatty tissue layer at the intended location of alfapump implant, or with other characteristics which could interfere with implantation procedure or transcutaneous charging of the alfapump.
  3. Subject has anemia with hemoglobin < 8g/dL
  4. Subject has serum sodium < 135 mEq/L
  5. Subject has clinical signs of low output heart failure
  6. Subject has severe cardiac cachexia
  7. Subject has history of severe hyperkalemia or screening plasma potassium > 4.5 mEq/L (K can be 4.5-5 meq/L if on 40meq or greater daily potassium supplementation and this can be stopped for the study).
  8. Subject has significant non-cardiac disease or comorbidities expected to reduce life expectancy to less than 1 year.
  9. Subject has cirrhosis or history of clinically significant ascites (i.e., prior large volume paracentesis) or large volume ascites on imaging or exam
  10. Subject has hemodynamically significant stenotic valvular disease
  11. Subject is receiving anti-coagulative or anti-platelet treatment which cannot be withheld for 5 days (replaced by bridging therapy low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin) prior to and 2-3 days after alfapump DSR system implantation;
  12. Subject has suffered myocardial infarction (MI), cerebro-vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days prior to enrolment in the study
  13. Subject has history of peritonitis or history of abdominal surgery with increased risk of major abdominal adhesion as assessed by the investigator
  14. Subject has any active infection or history of recurrent urinary tract infection or history of current urosepsis
  15. Subject has history of renal transplant
  16. Subject has history of significant bladder dysfunction expected to interfere with ability of subject to tolerate DSR pumping into bladder
  17. Subject has uncontrolled diabetes with frequent hyperglycemia or Type 1 diabetes
  18. Subject has urinary incontinence
  19. Subject has history of type 1 diabetes, diabetic ketoacidosis, "brittle" diabetes or frequent hypoglycemia or severe hypoglycemic episodes requiring emergent intervention (ER visit or EMS response, glucagon administration or forced oral carbs) in the last 6 months
  20. Subject is pregnant or is breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant during the study
  21. Subject has severe peripheral artery disease
  22. Subject has hypersensitivity to SGLT2 inhibitors
  23. Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial
  24. Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with all required study follow-up procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GROUP 1 DIRECT SODIUM REMOVAL + SGLT-2 INHIBITOR
SUBJECTS TREATED WITH DSR + STANDARD DOSE OF APPROVED SGLT-2 INHIBITOR
Infusion of sodium free Dextrose 10% into peritoneal cavity to remove sodium and fluid using principles of peritoneal dialysis; sodium and ultrafiltrate will be evacuated to the bladder by the alfapump
treatment with a standard dose of SGLT-2 inhibitor
Other Names:
  • dapagliflozin
Experimental: GROUP 2 DIRECT SODIUM REMOVAL
SUBJECTS TREATED WITH DSR
Infusion of sodium free Dextrose 10% into peritoneal cavity to remove sodium and fluid using principles of peritoneal dialysis; sodium and ultrafiltrate will be evacuated to the bladder by the alfapump

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - Treatment related SAE
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of treatment related serious adverse events
up to day 156
Safety - Device related SAE
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of Device related serious adverse events
up to day 156
Safety - Procedure related SAE
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of Procedure related serious adverse events
up to day 156

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - Treatment related
Time Frame: day 14
Rate of treatment related serious adverse events
day 14
Safety - Treatment related
Time Frame: day 128
Rate of treatment related serious adverse events
day 128
Safety - Treatment related
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of treatment related serious adverse events
up to day 156
Safety - Device related
Time Frame: day 14
Rate of Device related serious adverse events
day 14
Safety - Device related
Time Frame: day 128
Rate of Device related serious adverse events
day 128
Safety - Device related
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of Device related serious adverse events
up to day 156
Safety - Procedure related
Time Frame: day 14
Rate of Procedure related serious adverse events
day 14
Safety - Procedure related
Time Frame: day 128
Rate of Procedure related serious adverse events
day 128
Safety - Procedure related
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of Procedure related serious adverse events
up to day 156
Safety - Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: day 14
Rate of device deficiencies
day 14
Safety - Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: day 128
Rate of device deficiencies
day 128
Safety - Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: up to day 156
Rate of device deficiencies
up to day 156
Weight loss ≥ 5kgs
Time Frame: day 14
% of subjects reaching weight loss of ≥ 5kgs
day 14
Weight change
Time Frame: day 14
Change in weight from baseline
day 14
Weight change
Time Frame: day 128
Change in weight from baseline
day 128
Weight change
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in weight from baseline
up to day 156

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Euvolemic state
Time Frame: day 14
Time to reach euvolemic state
day 14
Euvolemic state
Time Frame: day 128
Time euvolemic state is maintained in maintenance period
day 128
Restart PRN Loop diuretic treatment
Time Frame: up to day 156
Time to restart of PRN loop diuretic treatment
up to day 156
Restart Loop diuretic treatment
Time Frame: up to day 156
Time to restart of systematic loop diuretic treatment after start of DSR treatment
up to day 156
Time Loop diuretic treatment reaching dose
Time Frame: up to day 156
Time to reach loop diuretic treatment dose ≥ loop diuretic dose prior to DSR treatment start
up to day 156
Time increase Loop diuretic treatment
Time Frame: up to day 156
Time to loop diuretic dose increase once on therapy
up to day 156
Amount Loop diuretic treatment
Time Frame: up to day 156
Total mg of loop diuretic administered
up to day 156
Change Renal function - urea
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in renal function -urea from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Change Renal function - creatinin
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in renal function -creatinin from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Change Hemoconcentration markers - serum hematocrit
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in hemoconcentration markers (serum hematocrit) from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Change Hemoconcentration markers - serum hemoglobin
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in hemoconcentration markers (serum hemoglobin) from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Hemoconcentration markers - serum albumin
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in hemoconcentration markers (serum albumin) from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Change Hemoconcentration markers - total serum protein
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in hemoconcentration markers (total serum protein) from baseline through treatment
up to day 156
Change N-Terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (nt-ProBNP)
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in nt-proBNP from basline through treatment
up to day 156
Change Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: day 128
Change in hemoglobin A1c
day 128
DSR doses
Time Frame: up to day 156
Number of DSR doses per week
up to day 156
Amount of 10% Dextrose infusate
Time Frame: up to day 156
Amount of 10% Dextrose infusate given
up to day 156
DSR dose adjustments
Time Frame: day 14
Number of DSR dose adjustments
day 14
DSR dose adjustments
Time Frame: day 128
Number of DSR dose adjustments
day 128
Sodium
Time Frame: up to day 156
Net sodium loss with each DSR treatment (8 hours of DSR exposure)
up to day 156
Urine volume
Time Frame: up to day 156
Net fluid loss with each DSR treatment (8 hours of DSR exposure)
up to day 156
Change 6-hour diuretic challenge response
Time Frame: day 14
Change in response to 6 hour diuretic challenge from baseline
day 14
Change 6-hour diuretic challenge response
Time Frame: day 128
Change in response to 6 hour diuretic challenge from baseline
day 128
Change 6-hour diuretic challenge response
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in response to 6 hour diuretic challenge from baseline
up to day 156
Change Plasma electrolytes - sodium
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in plasma electrolytes - Sodium from baseline
up to day 156
Change Plasma electrolytes - potassium
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in plasma electrolytes - potassium from baseline
up to day 156
Change Plasma electrolytes - magnesium
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in plasma electrolytes - magnesium from baseline
up to day 156
Change Plasma electrolytes - calcium
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in plasma electrolytes - calcium from baseline
up to day 156
Change Plasma electrolytes - phosphor
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in plasma electrolytes - phosphor from baseline
up to day 156
DSR dwell time
Time Frame: up to day 156
Dwell time per DSR treatment
up to day 156
Change Bio-impedance vector analysis
Time Frame: up to day 156
Change in Bio-impedance vector analysis
up to day 156
Ultrafiltration
Time Frame: up to day 156
Total ultrafiltration
up to day 156
Volume
Time Frame: up to day 156
Total volume removed
up to day 156
Glucose
Time Frame: up to day 156
Total glucose resorption during DSR treatment
up to day 156

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: TAMAZ SHABURISHVILI, MD, Tbilisi Heart & Vascular Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No IPD data will be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on ALFAPUMP DSR (DIRECT SODIUM REMOVAL) SYSTEM

3
Subscribe