DIStal gastriC Bypass OUtcome in Revision SurgEry After Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (DISCOURSE)

November 10, 2022 updated by: M.J. Wiezer, St. Antonius Hospital
This study is designed as a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two surgical techniques of distal gastric bypass (DGB) in revisional surgery following failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to A) DGB with lengthening of the BPL (DGB type I) or B) DGB with extended AL (DGB type II). Randomisation is stratified for participating center. The study will be performed in a clinical and out-patient setting with regular visits at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post intervention. The study will be set up as a multicenter study with bariatric centers: St. Antonius hospital, Groene Hart hospital, OLVG, Rijnstate hospital, Elisabeth Twee-steden Hospital, Bravis hospital, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Catharina Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: Up to 35% of morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) fail to lose sufficient weight or regain excessive weight after initial weight loss. Currently, there is no standardized approach to revisional surgery after failed RYGB. Distalisation of the RYGB limbs (DGB), with shortening of the common channel and extending either the alimentary limb (AL) or biliopancreatic limb (BPL), can be performed as revisional surgery to induce additional weight loss. To date, there is no general consensus as to optimal surgical technique or limb lengths to be used in distalisation of RYGB in both literature as well as clinical practice.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of two distalisation techniques of a gastric bypass in revisional surgery with standardised limb lengths in total weight loss (TWL) and the need for treatment for protein calorie malnutrition (PCM). In this randomised controlled trial DGB with lengthening of the BPL (DGB type I) will be compared to DGB with extended AL (DGB type II) in order to conclude which surgical technique is the optimal therapeutic strategy as revision surgery following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Study design: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Study population: Morbidly obese patients with insufficient weight loss or weight regain following primary RYGB, who are eligible for distalisation surgery.

Intervention: A total of 150 participants will be randomised over two treatment groups: group A will undergo DGB type I and group B will undergo DGB type II.

Main study endpoints: Primary endpoints: %TWL 1 year after treatment and need for treatment of PCM. Secondary endpoints: weight loss, co-morbidity remission, PCM grading (debilitating defecation patterns, temporary total parenteral nutrition treatment, revision, mortality), morbidity, nutritional deficiencies, quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Friesland
      • Leeuwarden, Friesland, Netherlands, 8934 AD
        • Recruiting
        • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
        • Contact:
    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6815 AD
        • Recruiting
        • Rijnstate Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Noord-Brabant
      • Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
      • Roosendaal, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 4708 AE
        • Recruiting
        • Bravis hospital
        • Contact:
      • Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5022 GC
        • Recruiting
        • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1061 AE
        • Recruiting
        • OLVG
        • Contact:
    • Utrecht
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Gouda, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2803 HH
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Groene Hart Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years;
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity related comorbidity;
  • Weight regain or insufficient weight loss (EWL<50% or TWL<20%)15,16 following RYGB;
  • Multidisciplinary team screening at one of the bariatric centres;
  • Informed consent and willing to enter the follow-up program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to anatomic, surgical reasons (gastric pouch dilatation >50 mL, gastro-gastric fistula, gastro-jejunostomy);
  • Distalisation of RYGB is technical infeasible (judgment by surgeon);
  • Inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome and other causes of chronic diarrhea;
  • Severe concomitant disease (such as carcinomas and neurodegenerative disorders);
  • Pregnant women;
  • Noncompliance in follow-up or unwilling to undergo surgery;
  • Inability of reading/understanding and filling out questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Distal gastric bypass type I
Laparoscopic distalisation of RYGB type I. The RYGB is modified by dividing the Roux limb (AL) at the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis and re-anastomosed distally to 200 cm from the ileocecal valve using linear staplers, creating a long biliopancreatic limb (BPL). In cases of initial AL lengths shorter than 100 cm, the CC lengths should be adjusted to create a TALL of at least 300 cm.
Distal gastric bypass, revisonal surgery after failed RYGB
Experimental: Distal gastric bypass type II
Laparoscopic distalisation of RYGB type II. The RYGB is modified by dividing the BPL at the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis and re-anastomosed distally to 200 cm from the ileocecal valve using linear staplers, creating a long AL.
Distal gastric bypass, revisonal surgery after failed RYGB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss
Time Frame: 1 year post-operative
Percentage total weight loss (%TWL) 1 year after treatment
1 year post-operative
Number of Participants with development of protein calorie malnutrition (PCM)
Time Frame: 1 year postoperative
>6 times/day defecation patterns with diarrhea, assessed by fecal score questionnaire
1 year postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss
Time Frame: Up to 3 year follow up
Patient weight in kilograms is collected preoperative up to 3 years follow-up to determine weight loss.
Up to 3 year follow up
TWL
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 month follow up
Weight loss in kilograms at a follow-up time point divided by weight in kilograms measured at DGB
3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 month follow up
Defecation pattern
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
Faecal score questionnaire to measure defecation frequencey and consistency
3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
PCM grading
Time Frame: up to 3 year follow up
Information is collected about each patient who has undergone DGB to ascertain debilitating defecation patterns (grade I), requirement of f participants requiring temporary total parenteral nutrition (grade II, revision surgery (grade III), and mortality (grade IV) after DGB.
up to 3 year follow up
Complications
Time Frame: uo to 3 year follow up
Information is collecting regarding the occurrence of one or more defined adverse events following DGB. Defined adverse events collected are: unplanned readmission to hospital, unplanned admission to the intensive care unit, unplanned return to the operating theatre, prolonged length of stay in hospital, and death. The reason for any of the events is also collected. If death occurs, the cause of death is collected to determine the likelihood of the death being caused by the DGB.
uo to 3 year follow up
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
BODY-Q questionnaire
3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
Impact defecation pattern questionnaire
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
Fecal incontinence quality of life scale FIQL questionnaires
3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
Patient satisfaction questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 and 3 year postoperative
Self-designed 5-point scale measuring instrument for patient satisfaction
1 and 3 year postoperative
Eating behaviour questionnaire
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative
Three factor earing questionnaire TFEQ R21
3, 12 and 36 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: M.J. Wiezer, PhD, MD, St. Antonius Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity, Morbid

Clinical Trials on Distal gastric bypass

3
Subscribe