European platforM to PromOte Wellbeing and HEalth in the Workplace (EMPOWER) (EMPOWER)

July 6, 2021 updated by: Fundació Sant Joan de Déu

European platforM to PromOte Wellbeing and HEalth in the woRkplace

EMPOWER is a multidisciplinary research and innovation effort aiming to developing, implementing, evaluating and disseminating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a modular eHealth intervention platform to promote health and well-being, reduce psychological distress, prevent common mental health problems and reduce their impact in the workplace. In collaboration with stakeholders, we will adapt existing effective interventions focused on different components (awareness and stigma, workplace conditions and psychosocial factors, stress, common mental health symptoms, early detection, comorbidity, lifestyle, and return to work) to created a combined online modular platform feasible in various workplace settings by culturally and contextually adapting it. The intervention will be implemented through a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial directed to employees and employers of small and medium sized enterprises and public agencies from three European countries (Spain, Finland and Poland) and United Kingdom. Both qualitative and quantitative methods will be used in the evaluation of the individual health outcomes, cost-effectiveness (from a social, economical, employer and employees perspective), and implementation facilitators and barriers. Implementation strategies relevant to the uptake of the EMPOWER intervention will be identified, including a realistic appraisal of barriers to uptake as well as evidence-based solutions to these barriers. Through scaling-up pre-existing effective and cost-effective interventions, EMPOWER is aimed at addressing the overarching challenges from different perspectives, including individual level (e.g., addressing stigma, mental health, well-being and lifestyles, taking into account legal, cultural and gender issues) and organizational level. The main outcomes effort will help employees, employers and policymakers in decision processes of new legal and contractual framework at EU and national level covering the new economy landscape.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The EMPOWER Project's main objective is to develop, test and evaluate a multi-modal and inclusive e-Health platform, compiling the most feasible, brief and cost-effective interventions currently available in Europe to promote health and wellbeing, prevent mental health problems and reduce the impact of mental health problems in the workplace.

Specifically, three intervention levels will be represented by interventions within the eHealth platform that are specially designed for the relevant populations and desired outcomes:

  1. Universal (primary) prevention: interventions to improve awareness and reduce stigma; to reduce psychosocial risk factors and providing early detection of mental disorders.
  2. Secondary prevention programs: interventions designed to improve wellbeing and reduce psychological distress and to promote healthy lifestyles. EMPOWER individual eHealth intervention will be based on the following components:

    • Psychoeducational material.
    • Challenges
    • Tracking
  3. Tertiary prevention program: return to work intervention. The intensive collaborative approach will design strategies to overcome the barriers that have already been identified for the widespread implementation of programs to promote wellbeing and reduce mental health problems in the workplace. EMPOWER aims to address the increasing burden of mental health problems in the workplace and improve mental health in the EU working population, having a positive impact on productivity. Partners from the consortium are coming from countries such as Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, UK, Switzerland and Australia.

An eHealth platform to reduce the impact of mental health problems at the workplace Mental health problems cause an enormous burden both for the individual and the society. A number of interventions have been developed to promote wellbeing and prevent or treat mental disorders in the workplace. Attempts to implement interventions by means of digital technologies have had statistically significant but minimally positive effects in reducing overall mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety and stress. However, most eHealth interventions focus on a single mental health condition and neglect comorbidity, particularly in the case of the more common mental disorders. Although effective and cost-effective workplace interventions are available, widespread implementation face a number of barriers. The stigma and discrimination at the workplace have been associated with delayed access to treatment, weakened social support, difficulties in the performance of occupational and social roles, unemployment, and diminished self-esteem. Although anti-stigma interventions targeting the general population and workplace settings have been implemented, there is room for improvement.

Collaboration among stakeholders is essential when developing and implementing effective interventions to reduce the impact of mental health problems at the workplace and evaluate their impact. The organization of work is rapidly changing. This growing diversity of what it means to work makes it clear that addressing mental health issues at the workplace will require ingenuity and flexibility to tailor interventions to the realities of the workplace setting.

The Framework Directive on Occupational Safety and Health, 89/391/EEC, lays down the employers' general duty to ensure workers' health and safety, "addressing all types of risk". Although the Framework does not explicitly address mental health issues in the workplace, it implicitly addresses them since it requires the employer to be aware of and address all types of health-related risks. At the same time, the European Commission's 2008 European Pact for Mental Health and Well-being20 and the 2016 European Framework for Action on Mental Health and Well-being21 have clearly raised the issue of mental health as a public health priority across society and the economy, mentioning workplace mental health as one target area. Although there has not as yet been a direct regulatory focus on mental health in the workplace, there is certainly a general consensus that it is incumbent on European employers to adequately identify and address known psychosocial risks.

Due to the fragmented landscape of interventions and related implementation barriers, there is an urgent need for a multi-modal and integrative eHealth platform aimed at reducing mental health problems in the workplace and improving employees' wellbeing, by compiling the most feasible, brief and cost-effective interventions currently available in Europe. The platform will take advantage of proven cost-effective tools and address the need to reduce stigma, increase help-seeking behaviour, raise awareness about and minimalize psychosocial risks, improve self-management strategies, taking into account mental and physical comorbidities, and promote a healthy lifestyle - all while considering gender and cultural differences that impact successful implementation. This is especially relevant for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which represent the majority of all enterprises in the EU but have very limited resources. The development and implementation of a multi-modal and integrative eHealth platform should, finally, be guided and supported by close collaboration with stakeholders, including employee and employer organisations, insurance companies, patient associations, and health professionals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

729

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Desiree Gutierrez Marin
  • Phone Number: 12544 +34 93 640 63 50
  • Email: dg.marin@pssjd.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Having a mobile phone with internet access
  • Having sufficient knowledge of the local language
  • Accepting the informed consent.
  • Being employed at the time of recruitment (baseline)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18
  • Not having sufficient knowledge of the local language
  • Being unemployed at the time of recruitment (baseline)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: First intervention group
Clusters 1 and 2 (group 1) will start the intervention at month 1, immediately after completing the baseline assessment. After 7 weeks of using the app and having access to the EMPOWER website (with material related to the anti-stigma campaign and recommendations for employees to deal with psychosocial risk factors), they will answer a post-treatment assessment protocol through the app.
It addresses six main domains: improving awareness of mental health problems and reducing stigma; reducing psychosocial risk factors in the workplace; improving wellbeing and reducing psychological symptoms; ensuring early detection of mental disorders; promoting healthy behaviours and lifestyles; and facilitating early return to work.
Other: Second intervention group
Clusters 3 and 4 (group 2) that serve as control group of cluster 1 and 2 (group 1), will also complete the assessment at T1. Clusters 3 and 4 (group 2) will start the intervention in step 2, after completing the second assessment.
It addresses six main domains: improving awareness of mental health problems and reducing stigma; reducing psychosocial risk factors in the workplace; improving wellbeing and reducing psychological symptoms; ensuring early detection of mental disorders; promoting healthy behaviours and lifestyles; and facilitating early return to work.
Other: Third intervention group
Clusters 5 and 6 (group 3), that serve as control group of group 1 and 2, will also complete the assessment at T2. Clusters 5 and 6 (group 3) will start the intervention in step 3. All clusters will answer a total of five assessments
It addresses six main domains: improving awareness of mental health problems and reducing stigma; reducing psychosocial risk factors in the workplace; improving wellbeing and reducing psychological symptoms; ensuring early detection of mental disorders; promoting healthy behaviours and lifestyles; and facilitating early return to work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Change in depressive symptomatology for employees, measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) sum score. It ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe symptomatology. A score higher than 19 is considered as indicative of high risk of depression
at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Change in anxiety symptoms (by means of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7-GAD-7- total scores). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher level of anxiety.
at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Perceived stress
Time Frame: at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Change of perceived stress measured with the Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4). The total score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores correlating with higher levels of stress.
at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Insomnia severity
Time Frame: at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Change in insomnia severity uisng three items of Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). We will calculate a total score which will range from 0 to 16. Higher scores will indicate severe levels of insomnia.
at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Well-being
Time Frame: at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Change in well-being (assessed with the World Health Organization-5; WHO-5 scale). The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.
at both 7 weeks and 3-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PIC-39-20
  • Grant Agreement:848180 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Research and Innovation Framework Programme SC1-BHC-22-2019)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Despite a plan to make IPD available is not being decided yet, the aim of EMPOWER is to follow the FAIR criteria for research data. The data produced and/or used in the project should be assessable for and intelligible to third parties in contexts such as scientific scrutiny and peer review (e.g. data are provided in a way that judgments can be made about their reliability and the competence of those who created them). In that regard, EMPOWER has the intention to make (part of) the research data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable (FAIR).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

3
Subscribe