Environmental Labelling in a Virtual Supermarket

Impact of Environmental Labelling on Food Choices : a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Virtual Reality Supermarket

A 2-arm randomised control trial (with and without labels) will be conducted to test the effects of an environmental label on food choices in a virtual supermarket. A sample of 130 participants will take part in two shopping tasks: 1/ selection of 3 products to prepare a home-made dish, and 2/ selection of a ready-to-eat dish. These two tasks will be repeated for two scenarios: 1/ participants will be asked to select the foods for usual meals, and 2/ participants will be asked to select the foods for environmentally-friendly meals. This experimental design will allow to compare food choices in the presence vs. the absence of an environmental label and to investigate whether the label is informative and likely to help individuals to choose more environmental-friendly food options when explicitly asked to do so.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

See attached protocol documents

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Responsible for a substantial proportion of household grocery shopping
  • Fluent in French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dietary restrictions (vegetarian, vegan, allergies, intolerance, …)
  • Uncorrected eye problems
  • Known symptoms of nausea and dizziness when wearing a virtual reality headset

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No labelling
Food products without any label in the virtual supermarket.
Experimental: Environmental labelling
Food products with an environmental label in the virtual supermarket.

Food products in the virtual supermarket will display an environmental label on their packaging, from A (lowest impact) to E (highest impact). The label categories are based on the Product Environmental Footprint, a score recommended by the European Commission that evaluates the environmental impact of a food product based on 16 indicators calculated throughout the life cycle of the products (e.g., climate change in kg carbon dioxide eq, marine eutrophication in kg N eq, land and water use or acidification in mol H+ eq).

Instructions will introduce and explain the environmental label to the participants as "In the virtual supermarket, each product will have an environmental label. This label describes whether a product had a negative impact on the environment (green house gaz emissions, water resources depletion, etc.) from A, lowest impact, to E, highest impact.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Environmental impact of the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
The environmental impact of the food selection will be calculated using the Product Environmental Footprint score for 100g of products throughout their life cycle.
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Familiarity for the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
The familiarity for each food selected will be assessed using a discrete scale from 1 (never purchased) to 5 (very often purchased).
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
Liking for the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
The liking for each food selected will be assessed using a discrete scale from 1 (I don't like it at all) to 10 (I like it very much).
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
Nutritional quality of the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
The nutritional quality of the food selection will be calculated using the score from the British Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score).
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
Level of processing of the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
The level of processing of the food selection will be estimated using a food classification system based on food processing (NOVA).
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
Price of the food items selected
Time Frame: 15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)
Price of the food selection will be calculated per 100 kcal.
15 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food choice task and there is no follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucile Marty, PhD, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EIPH0126

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Share on Open Science Framework

IPD Sharing Time Frame

On publication, indefinitely

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open website

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diet, Healthy

Clinical Trials on Labelling

3
Subscribe