LLTS to Treat Premature Ventricular Contractions (TREAT-PVC)

Transcutaneous Electrical Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Suppress Premature Ventricular Contractions

This randomized control trial is designed to explore the effect of low-level tragus stimulation in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Premature ventricular contraction (PVC), also known as premature ventricular beat, is one of the most common symptomatic arrhythmias in clinical practice. PVCs may cause serious harm to patients as follow: 1. PVCs with considerable load can increase the incidence of cardiomyopathy; 2. Some recurrent malignant arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, can be induced by PVCs; 3. cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacing/defibrillator non-responders may be due to frequent PVCs, which reduce the proportion of biventricular pacing; 4. For structural heart disease patients, PVCs may make their damaged heart function further deteriorated. At present, the clinical treatment of PVCs is still based on drugs, such as beta-blockers, mexiletine, propafenone, etc., and their effectiveness varies greatly among individuals. The status of catheter ablation in the treatment of ventricular premature beats continuous improvement, but this is an invasive operation and relatively expensive, which limits its wide application in clinical practice. Recent studies have shown that the autonomic nervous system plays an important role in the occurrence and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmia. Relevant studies have confirmed that the onset of ventricular arrhythmia is related to sympathetic nerve excitement. Moreover, inhibiting sympathetic nerve activity, including anesthesia, sympathetic nerve block, sympathetic nerve denervation, etc., can effectively reduce the onset and burden of ventricular arrhythmia. On the other hand, in patients with myocardial ischemia-related ventricular arrhythmia, atrial arrhythmia, and heart failure, the safety and effectiveness of the treatment of vagus nerve stimulation have also been verified. Low-level tragus stimulation (LLTS) is an emerging method of regulating autonomic nerves. Functional cardiac magnetic resonance studies have confirmed that by stimulating the auricle branch of the vagus nerve distributed in the tragus of the outer ear, the central projection of the vagus nerve in the brainstem and other higher centers can be activated. It is worth noting that LLTS has been used in clinical practice to treat tinnitus and epilepsy. Moreover, recent studies have confirmed that LLTS can reduce sympathetic nerve activity, inhibit inflammatory factors, and reduce the atrial fibrillation burden in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Aim of the Study The current trial is designed to explore the effect of low-level tragus stimulation in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions.

Study Design This is a randomized, prospective, parallel, single-blind multicenter design. The enrollment target for this investigation is 100 patients. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion into one of the investigation arms: active and sham LLTS group. Active LLTSs are performed using a transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation device (Parasym device, Parasym Health, London, United Kingdom) with an ear clip attached to the tragus of the right ear. In the sham group, the clips are attached to the ear lobe and regarded as effectless to vagus nerve. At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, patients underwent noninvasive continuous ECG monitoring for 10 days to evaluate their PVC burden (defined as the percentage of premature ventricular beats in total heart beats) using an adhesive continuous ECG patch. Heart rate variability, quality of life, skin sympathetic nerve activity and serum cytokine measurement are evaluated at baseline and follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chen minglong, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18, <80 of age
  • Symptomatic PVCs refractory to ≥1 antiarrhythmic drugs (including β-blockers and calcium-channel blockers).
  • PVC burden ≥ 10%, with or without prior ablation
  • Arrhythmias originated from any focus (foci) in the right ventricular or left ventricular.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% unless proven to be PVC-mediated cardiomyopathy (history of improving LVEF by >15% when PVC burden was reduced by pharmacological agents or ablation)
  • EF continues to decrease in the past 4 months regardless of the etiology
  • Unwilling to continue current pharmacological therapy during the study period
  • Severe heart failure with New York Heart Association Class ≥ III
  • Ventricular arrhythmias attributed to underlying structural heart disease, known myocardial scar or myocarditis
  • Change of anti-arrhythmic drug dosing, including β-blockers and calcium channel blockers, within 2 months prior to enrollment
  • < 3 months after prior unsuccessful ablation:
  • Patients on amiodarone
  • Patients with known thyroid issues, on renal-dialysis
  • life expectancy of < 12 months
  • Sustained ventricular tachycardia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control Group
Sham stimulation
Frequency: 20 Hz; Pulse width: 0.2 ms; Current is based on the following: Determine the perception threshold (feeling tingling) at the time of baseline information assessment. Because of sensory adaptation, ask the patient 5 minutes later to increase the current by 1-5 mA. Try to find the current level below the discomfort level and above the perception threshold; Stimulate spot: ear lobe. Stimulation time: 30 min in the morning (from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and 30 min in the evening (from 20:00 p.m. to 23:00 p.m.)
Experimental: Experimental Group
Low-level tragus stimulation
Frequency: 20Hz; Pulse width: 0.2 ms; Current is based on the following: Determine the perception threshold (feeling tingling) at the time of baseline information assessment. Because of sensory adaptation, ask the patient 5 minutes later to increase the current by 1-5 mA. Try to find the current level below the discomfort level and above the perception threshold; Stimulation spot: ear tragus; Stimulation time: 30 min in the morning (from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and 30 min in the evening (from 20:00 p.m. to 23:00 p.m.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PVC burden
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Patients underwent noninvasive continuous ECG monitoring using an adhesive continuous ECG patch for 10 days to evaluate their PVC burden which is defined as the percentage of premature ventricular beats in total heart beats.
3 months follow-up
PVC burden
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
Patients underwent noninvasive continuous ECG monitoring using an adhesive continuous ECG patch for 10 days to evaluate their PVC burden which is defined as the percentage of premature ventricular beats in total heart beats.
6 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire to score severity of symptoms and quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
Patients are required to complete 36-item short form health survey questionnaire to score severity of symptoms and quality of life. The scores ranges from 0-100. Higher scores mean healthier status.
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Serum cytokine marker
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
hsCRP (mg/L) level in serum
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Serum cytokine marker
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
Interleukin-6 (ng/mL) level in serum
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Skin sympathetic nerve activity
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
20-min recording using our customized device. The electrical activity that can be measured on the surface of the skin originates from the heart, the muscle or nerve structures. Because the frequency content of nerve activity falls in a higher frequency range than that of the ECG and myopotential, it is possible to use high-pass or band-pass filtering to specifically isolate the skin sympathetic nerve activity. The unit of measure is µV.
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Treatment compliance
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
acquire patients' stimulation diaries to assess compliance
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Number of participants with adverse effects
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
Number of participants with pruritus, flush, pain at the stimulation cite
3 months and 6 months follow-up
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months follow-up
Parameters include Standard deviation of the NN (R-R) intervals, Low frequency/High frequency ratio et al. which reflect sympathovagal balance and are calculated according to holter recording
3 months and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Ventricular Contraction

Clinical Trials on Low-level tragus stimulation

3
Subscribe