Real-time State of Vigilance Monitor for the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

January 15, 2024 updated by: John Barks, University of Michigan
The goal of this observational study is to collect data to develop a complete package (hardware, user interface software and algorithms) that can monitor sleep-wake stages in neonates. Real-time EEG data will be used to develop and refine the prototype monitor's ability to provide direct real-time information about sleep-wake state. The study design includes multiple iterative training/testing stages to refine the prototype. The study is divided into multiple sub-aims conducted in parallel: data acquisition, algorithm development (including comparison between gold-standard polysomnogram vs. novel algorithm markings of sleep-stages), and graphical user interface software development. The data acquisition and algorithm development are iterative and linked, such that the prototype algorithm from one iteration will be deployed real-time during the next iteration of data acquisition. This allows verification that the algorithm can perform real-time and provides prospective testing data, which is later folded into the training data for the next iteration, for verification and validation of the system.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Use Case: Disruption of sleep is a common experience of hospitalized patients of all ages, especially if they are in an intensive care unit (ICU); infants in the NICU often stay weeks to months. The quality of neonatal sleep is strongly associated with later neurodevelopment. Abnormal sleep quality in neonates is associated with less attention orienting at 4 months, increased distractibility, decreased developmental function at 12-24 months, and lower emotional regulation and cognitive development at age 5. Yet disruptions to sleep are frequent: the study team has found that NICU neonates are handled by staff with a median interval of 2.3 min. Handling occurred across all sleep-wake stages and frequently resulted in arousals, awakenings, and respiratory events.

The study will employ multiple levels of noise reduction and signal quality assessment, tailored to the specific needs of the algorithm and to the NICU environment. The final algorithm will include four sleep-wake stages (awake, quiet/non-REM sleep, active/REM sleep, indeterminate/transitional sleep). The complete algorithm is intended to do what no existing algorithm does, as it uniquely combines the assessment of data quality, ability to run real-time on un-curated data, and identification of four sleep-wake stages. In this observational study, validation of the monitor "read-out" in comparison to the gold standard polysomnogram happens offline, after the completion of data collection from the subject.

Because this is an observational study to develop and validate a new physiologic monitoring modality (the bedside sleep monitor), there is no subject intervention. No change in care for these study subjects is envisioned to result from use of this prototype monitor. It is hoped that the proposed technology will create a unique solution that will one day be deployed in the NICU.

Potential Future Research Use of Monitor: The study team hypothesizes that adjusting the timing of NICU patient contact to avoid multiple sleep disruptions might improve sleep in the NICU, which could then lead to better neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, the efficacy of this approach would need to be proved in randomized controlled trials. The conduct of such a future randomized clinical trial would be facilitated by availability of a real-time, objective monitor of sleep-wake states like what the study team proposes to develop. However, the present observational study serves as an initial stage of research that would lead up to that kind of trial.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John Barks, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Gliske, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Newborns admitted to the Newborn ICU in C&W Mott Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the Newborn ICU in C&W Mott Hospital
  • >/= 30 weeks gestational age at the time of birth (>/= 33 weeks post-conceptional age at enrollment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any diagnosis, patient care, or anticipated patient care that is likely to interfere with the 12 hour recording or would make the recording dangerous to the participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NICU Cohort
Participants will undergo a standard polysomnogram
Comparison of Novel Real-time Neonatal Sleep Stage Detection Algorithm to gold standard concurrent polysomnogram.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of sleep (any stage)
Time Frame: 12 hours
Negative predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NPV for detection of REM sleep
Time Frame: 12 hours
Negative predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours
NPV for detection of non-REM sleep
Time Frame: 12 hours
Negative predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours
Positive predictive value (PPV) of Sleep
Time Frame: 12 hours
Positive predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours
Positive predictive value (PPV) of REM sleep
Time Frame: 12 hours
Positive predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours
Positive predictive value (PPV) of non-REM sleep
Time Frame: 12 hours
Positive predictive value of monitor compared to gold-standard polysomnogram
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Barks, MD, University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Gliske, PhD, University of Nebraska

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00187386
  • 1R61HL154095-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Disease

3
Subscribe