Shared Decision Making on Radiation Dose for Lung Malignancies

October 30, 2023 updated by: Vejle Hospital

Shared Decision Making on Radiation Dose for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Malignancies Located Less Than 1 cm From the Thoracic Wall. A Randomized Trial

A Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) is developed during a workshop in close collaboration with selected patients. The PtDA is subsequently used in the consultation between patient and physician to facilitate their shared decision on the dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors located less than 1 cm from the thoracic wall.

Hypothesis: The use of a PtDA will increase the extent of Shared Decision Making (SDM) during the consultation and result in patients being more directly involved in the planning of their treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

When a lung tumor is located close to the thoracic wall, there is an increased risk of developing chest wall pain or rib fracture following SBRT of the tumor. A meta-analysis has shown the pooled risk of chest wall pain to be 11% and that of rib fracture to be 6.3% with significant differences between individual studies. These side effects may occur several years after the treatment.

SDM is a collaborative process allowing patients and healthcare professionals to make decisions together taking into account the best scientific evidence as well as patients' values, preferences, life situation, and knowledge about disease process and prognosis.

PtDAs are tools designed to assist caregivers in the process of informing patients about relevant treatment options. PtDAs contain factual and balanced information about the options and the pertaining pros, cons, and probabilities. The tools are relevant when the decision is preference-sensitive, that is, the right treatment cannot be decided based on professional knowledge alone. The use of PtDAs has shown to provide a number of positive effects on the patients, including increased knowledge of options, better understanding of risks, and clarity as to what matters most in their life situation. Other effects are decreased decisional conflict and a higher degree of involvement in decision making.

This is a randomized trial enrolling eligible patients during a period of 16 months. SDM will be used in the planning of SBRT to patients with peripheral non-small cell lung tumors or lung metastases and offer them the choice between high (66 Gy in 3 fractions) and low (45 Gy in 3 fractions) radiation dose.

A total of 40 patients will be included in the study, i.e. 20 patients in each arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Region Of Southern Denmark
      • Vejle, Region Of Southern Denmark, Denmark, 7100
        • Recruiting
        • Vejle Hospital, Department of Oncology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Histologically confirmed or high probability of non-small cell lung cancer, or metastasis from other cancer, located ≤ 1 cm from the thoracic wall. High probability refers to consensus on the diagnosis at the local multi-disciplinary lung tumor conference.
  • Eligible for stereotactic body radiation therapy in ablative doses (i.e. 66/45 Gy in 3 fractions) following national guidelines (2).
  • Can read and understand Danish.
  • Written and orally informed consent.
  • Performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy > 6 months assessed by the physician during the consultation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous radiation therapy in the thoracic region (lung, breast or mediastinum), if it is not possible to produce a new radiation plan of 66 or 45 Gy in 3 fractions that considers previous radiation therapy and still complies with all constraints, including dose to the thoracic wall. Previous surgery in the thorax is allowed.
  • Mental or social conditions preventing full understanding of the information or the planned treatment and follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: A - control
The patients are offered high or lower dose according to usual practice
Experimental: B - Intervention
The Patient Decision Aid is used during the consultation to aid in the decision on high or lower dose.
The Patient Decision Aid informs about the pros and cons of each option

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The extent of shared decision making in the consultation between patient and oncologist as measured by the OPTION tool
Time Frame: During the one hour primary consultation.
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 48. The higher the value, the higher the extent of SDM during the consultation
During the one hour primary consultation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in patient perceived level of shared decision making between arm A and B as measured by the tool SDM-Q9.
Time Frame: Immediately after the primary consultation
Minimum value 0. Maximum value 45. The higher the value, the higher the patient experienced extent of SDM during the consultation
Immediately after the primary consultation
Difference in patient perceived level of shared decision making between arm A and B as measured by the tool SDM_P4
Time Frame: Immediately after the primary consultation
Minimum value 0. Maximum value 4. The higher the value, the higher the patient experienced extent of SDM during the consultation
Immediately after the primary consultation
Difference in patient perceived level of shared decision making between arm A and B as measured by the tool CollaboRATE
Time Frame: Immediately after the primary consultation
Minimum value 0. Maximum value 27. The higher the value, the higher the patient experienced extent of SDM during the consultation
Immediately after the primary consultation
Difference in decisional conflict between patients in arm A and B as measured by the Decision Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the primary consultation
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 64. The higher the value, the more decisional conflict.
Immediately after the primary consultation
Difference in decisional regret between patients in arm A and B as measured by the Decision Regret Scale
Time Frame: Reported by the patients six months and 3 years after the primary consultation
Minimum value: 5. Maximum value: 25. The higher the value, the more decisional regret.
Reported by the patients six months and 3 years after the primary consultation
Difference in fear of cancer recurrence between patients in arm A and B as measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence - Short Form questionnaire
Time Frame: Reported by the patients six months and 3 years after the primary consultation
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 36. The higher the value, the more fear of recurrence.
Reported by the patients six months and 3 years after the primary consultation
Number of patients developing chest wall pain and/or rib fracture during the 5-year follow-up program
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Evaluated by the physician every three months the first two years and then every six months the following three years.
Up to 5 years
Quality of Life as measured by the questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30.
Time Frame: Up to 5 years

Thirty questions with two different scales (1-4 and 1-7). The higher the value, the more symptoms/problems.

Completed by the patients every three months the first two years and then every six months the following three years.

Up to 5 years
Quality of Life as measured by the questionnaire EORTC QLQ-LC29
Time Frame: Up to 5 years

Twenty-nine questions on a scale from 1 to 4. The higher the value, the more symptoms/problems.

Completed by the patients every three months the first two years and then every six months the following three years.

Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas L Fink, MD, Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized data will be available on relevant request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell

Clinical Trials on A Patient Decision Aid

3
Subscribe