Mental Imagery Intervention for Alcohol Craving (ACLIMAGE)

Estimating the Acute Impact of Competing Mental Imagery on Craving in Alcohol Use Disorder

A within-subjects crossover, randomised controlled trial conducted at a specialist NHS outpatient addictions clinics to determine if mental imagery (of future positive [recovery oriented] events) and a visuospatial task (playing Tetris) can help reduce cue-induced alcohol craving. Effects of both interventions will be compared.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Tetris Task; Behavioral: Mental Imagery for Craving Reduction

Detailed Description

Alcohol misuse has a devastating economic impact, with alcohol misuse reportedly costing the UK £20 billion a year. The burden on the health system is also well recognized, with for example, 70% of all admissions to A&E could be linked to alcohol misuse. Meanwhile, the links between alcohol misuse and mental health conditions is well recognized, where the prevalence of patients who have a dual diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and another psychiatric condition, is well-established in the literature.

Some cognitive models of substance misuse have also hypothesized about the central role that imagery can have in the initiation and maintenance of addiction. The Elaborated Intrusion (EI) Theory hypothesises that elaborating on alcohol related imagery is integral to the craving experience which ultimately leads to drinking. The EI theory describes craving beginning with an intrusive thought, triggered automatically by external or physiological cues, and associated cognitions. Where these thoughts are pleasurable, the individual will likely elaborate. Elaboration is an effortful cognitive event, where sensory information about the substance is searched for and held in working memory as an image. The theory suggests that during the elaboration process, increasingly rich cues serve to heighten the vividness of consumption imagery, giving acquisition even greater urgency and attentional priority. These images are initially rewarding but as elaboration continues, awareness of somatic deficit and negative affect will occur where the target is not acquired and consumed.

As the elaboration is effortful, the theory proposes that the construction and maintenance of these desire images takes up limited working memory capacity. Therefore, the EI theory suggests that were elaboration is disrupted, through a competing task, craving will reduce.

Tetris has now been tested across craving populations to test the EI theory. Research groups have found that playing Tetris was significantly better than a control condition (watching a loading screen) at reduced self-reported craving for a range of targets. Tetris, therefore appears to be an easily accessible tool to operationalise as a means to interfere with visuo-spatial elaboration during craving for patients.

The researchers who developed the EI theory, hypothesise that familiar, habitual sensory imagery around a desired substance will hold vividness and emotive power that is easily maintained where competing imagery is weak and less meaningful or vivid to the individual. In the researcher's view, this is what explains relapse to alcohol, as competing tasks do not hold sufficient pleasure or reward during craving to engage individuals attention. Therefore, while they may agree with evidence that 'blocking' the elaboration of imagery processes is a useful (and more effective start than other non-imagery based distraction tasks), they hypothesise that a personalised and meaningful image with significant reward feature should outperform a visuo-spatial task, such as Tetris, in blocking the craving processes.

Findings support this, suggesting that personally meaningful aspirational or 'positive' images around abstaining can be effective in reducing urges to use. For example, in piloting 'Functional Imagery Training' (FIT), researchers found that patients who rehearsed multisensory positive goal imagery lost more weight and reduced snacking more than a wait list control group. However, no study has compared this 'positive/motivational image' approach to an alternative visuo-spatial working memory task.

This study has the following aims:

• To determine if visualising a meaningful/positive image reduces craving more than engaging in a non-meaningful visuo-spatial task in alcohol use disorder.
• To determine if the vividness of the positive image generated impacts the efficacy of the imagery intervention.
• To determine the pre-morbid ability of the sample in generating prospective/future imagery.
• To determine if the pre-morbid ability for generating prospective/future images impact the efficacy of the imagery intervention.

Participants will be recruited from specialist NHS outpatient addictions clinics (Wandsworth, Bexley and Lambeth community substance misuse services).

Informed consenting adult participants will be randomised to one of two conditions during a single session research appointment:

1. Tetris then Positive Image
2. Positive Image then Tetris

Participants will undergo a craving induction procedure designed to elicit cue-induced craving. In response to elevated craving, participants will be asked to reduce craving levels using a positive future mental imagery intervention and playing Tetris.

Participants will be fully debriefed and provided time to ask any questions they may have. A craving reduction task will also be offered. Participants will also be asked to identify a named person they can contact if they later feel concerned or distressed. Where required, signposting to support will be offered.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 46
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
    • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Able to give informed consent.
• Engaging in working with a community substance misuse service
• Meets DSM-V criteria for alcohol dependency or abuse, or in early recovery.
• Alcohol is the primary substance of dependence.
• 18 years and older.
• Proficient use of the English language to complete questionnaires and an interview.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Cognitive impairment
• Undergoing detoxification for alcohol
• Presence of a psychotic disorder.
• Recent parasuicidal behaviour (last month).
• High levels of intoxication.
• Severe neurodevelopmental disorder (for example Autism/ADHD) that is deemed to impact on the participants' ability to undertake the interview.
• Organic brain injury, including Korsakoff syndrome.
• Currently participating, or recently participated (last month), in other research.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Tetris, Positive Image; Participants randomised to order of intervention: this arm has; Tetris (Active Comparator) then Positive Future Image (Intervention).	Behavioral: Tetris Task; a visual task where participants are asked to play 'tetris' i.e. attend to and manipulate shapes and positions on screen; Behavioral: Mental Imagery for Craving Reduction; a behavioural mental imagery intervention where participants are asked to generate a specific future mental image to reduce cue-induced craving for alcohol
OTHER: Positive Image, Tetris; Participants randomised to order of intervention: this arm has; Positive Future Image (Intervention) then Tetris (Active Comparator).	Behavioral: Tetris Task; a visual task where participants are asked to play 'tetris' i.e. attend to and manipulate shapes and positions on screen; Behavioral: Mental Imagery for Craving Reduction; a behavioural mental imagery intervention where participants are asked to generate a specific future mental image to reduce cue-induced craving for alcohol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change from baseline in Craving Experience Questionnaire - Strength Version (CEQ-S) Score	This is a brief, valid and generic measure of craving/desire based on the Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire (Kavanagh et al.,2005) and will be completed; 1) on arrival, 2) following the first cue-induction, 3) following the first condition: the tetris task or positive image, 4) following the second cue-induction, 5) following the second condition: the tetris. The CEQ-S measure comprises of 11 items that capture the intensity, imagery and intrusiveness of craving experiences. In the strength scale, participants are asked to rate their experience on a 0-10 likert scale (0=not at all to 10=extremely). Max score = 110 Min score = 0. Higher scores indicate higher strength of craving.	Throughout study completion, an average of 1.5 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure: CORE-10	This is a valid, reliable and brief 10-item version of CORE-OM used as a screening tool and outcome measure. Items cover anxiety, depression, trauma, physical problems, functioning and risk to self. CORE-10 was designed to assess global distress, such as symptoms of anxiety, depression, risk to self and associated aspects of life and social functioning. Participants rate their level of agreement to the statement on a five-point likert scale (0-4), ('not at all', 'only occasionally', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'most or all of the time') over the last week. Scores range from 0-40. A score on the CORE-10 of 11-15 is indicative of mild psychological distress, 16-20 is moderate, 21-25 equating moderate to severe and 26 and over indicating severe psychological distress.	Approx. minute 5
Prospective Imagery Task (PIT)	Participants are asked to form a mental image of negative future scenarios and positive future scenarios. The scenarios are comprised of the subjective probability items used by MacLeod et al. (1996) and include events such as ''You will have a serious disagreement with your friend'' or ''You will do well on your course''. Each image is rated for vividness on a continuous 5-point Likert scale anchored at each point from (1) no image at all; (2) vague and dim; (3) unclear but recognisable; (4) moderately vivid; and (5) very vivid. Holmes and colleagues (2008) have adapted a shortened version on this task using 10 negative future scenarios and 10 positive future scenarios, which shall be adopted here. Scores can range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater vividness.	Approx. minute 7
SCID-5-CV (Dependence and remission questionnaire). The structured clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders. Clinician Version (DSM-5)	This is a valid and reliable semi-structured interview guide intended to determine whether an individual meets the criteria for the specified DSM V diagnoses and to measure severity of dependence.	Approx. minute 20
Vividness Rating of Positive Image	This will be measured via 0-100 scale with participant rating how vivid the imaged image was that they generated. Higher score indicates higher vividness.	Approx. minute 60

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: King's College London
• Collaborators: South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: John Marsden, Prof, King's College London

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): September 20, 2021
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): May 21, 2022
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): May 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 25, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 1, 2021
• First Posted (ACTUAL): July 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): May 24, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 23, 2022
• Last Verified: June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Chemically-Induced Disorders; Drinking Behavior; Alcohol-Related Disorders; Substance-Related Disorders; Alcohol Drinking; Alcoholism
• Other Study ID Numbers: 295682

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No