Incorporating ePrognosis for the Encouragement of Smarter Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Incorporating ePrognosis to Encourage "Smarter Screening" for Breast and Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

This clinical trial assesses the feasibility and acceptability of a smarter screening intervention for breast and colorectal cancer in older adults. This study aims to learn more about how to support patients and physicians in making cancer screening decisions for older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Complete development of and refine "Smarter Screening", a multi-component, patient-centered intervention centered around ePrognosis: Cancer Screening to facilitate shared decision-making screening discussions for breast and colorectal cancer in older adults.

II. Assess feasibility and acceptability of the "Smarter Screening" intervention and assess its impact versus usual care on shared decision-making about whether or not to continue breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among multi-ethnic and socioeconomically diverse primary care patients.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Impact on breast and CRC screening versus usual care.

II. Risk perception, worry, and a patient-reported measure of decision quality.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Participants receive Passport to Health booklet and complete ePrognosis before scheduled primary care visit.

ARM II: Participants receive usual care before scheduled primary care visit.

After completion of study, participants are followed up at 1 week post primary care visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 70 years and above
  • Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study
  • Ability of individual to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
  • Have no prior history of cancer
  • Scheduled for an upcoming appointment in University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) General Internal Medicine or Women's Health Primary Care clinics
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to any study-related procedure or assessment
  • Non-English speaking
  • Are under the current medical care of either the study primary investigator (PI) or co-investigator (Co-I)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (Passport to Health booklet, ePrognosis)
Participants receive Passport to Health booklet and complete ePrognosis before scheduled primary care visit.
Receive Passport to Health booklet
Complete ePrognosis
Active Comparator: Arm II (usual care)
Participants receive usual care before scheduled primary care visit.
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Ancillary studies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants enrolled
Time Frame: 6 months
Ability to successfully recruit the target of approximately 40 patients will be determined by the overall number of participants who were screened for enrollment compared to the overall number of participants who were randomized to one of the groups.
6 months
Proportion of primary care physicians (PCPs) enrolled
Time Frame: 6 months
Ability to successfully recruit PCPs will be determined by the overall number of physicians who were contacted compared to the overall number of physicians who actively participated over the course of the study.
6 months
Percentage of participants enrolled at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators aim to attain at least 75% of recruited patients in each arm at the 6 month follow-up.
6 months
Proportion of participants who received an ePrognosis report
Time Frame: 6 months
The proportion of participants who received an ePrognosis report will be reported
6 months
Proportion of physicians who utilized the ePrognosis clinician report
Time Frame: 6 months
All enrolled intervention PCPs will receive a web-based survey after each patient visit to record whether the physicians used and/or discussed ePrognosis in that visit. The proportion of physicians who use the ePrognosis clinician report in their cancer screening counseling with participants/patients will be reported
6 months
Responses to Qualitative Acceptability survey
Time Frame: 6 months
A survey will be provided to PCPs and used to measure acceptability of the ePrognosis report by asking patients and providers to provide feedback about the intervention, including likes and dislikes, and future recommendation of using the report provided.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients screened for breast cancer
Time Frame: 6 months
The impact on breast cancer screening versus usual care will be measured by comparing the proportion or participants who were screened for cancers by treatment arm.
6 months
Proportion of patients screened for colorectal cancer
Time Frame: 6 months
The impact on colorectal cancer screening versus usual care will be measured by comparing the proportion or participants who were screened for cancers by treatment arm.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judith M Walsh-Cassidy, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Best Practice

3
Subscribe