A Wearable AI Feedback Tool for Pediatric OCD

Wrist Angel: A Wearable AI Feedback Tool for OCD Treatment and Research

To test the feasibility of implementing digitally enhanced psychotherapy and research in a community child and adolescent mental health center including the acceptability of the digital technology to patients, parents and therapists.

To use passively collected physiological data and actively collected clinical and biochemical data from the patient and parents to detect and predict episodes of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) -related episodes in children and accommodating behaviour in parents.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Psychiatric and specifically mechanistic research have stagnated mainly due to the time, labour and bias inherent in human-based technologies that dominate the field. To advance translational and precision psychiatry, researchers within psychiatry must forge long-term collaborations with researchers and developers within technology.

Objectives: To improve assessment and psychotherapy for youth obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) through developing an artificial intelligence tool to support patients, parents and therapists in cognitive behavioural therapy. To give an innovative push in the public sector hospitals and research through integration of wearable sensors and machine learning techniques.

Methods: 10 patients (8-17 years) and one of their parents from a child and adolescent mental health center will be recruited as in the larger TECTO project. To examine whether the algorithms can distinguish between patients and typically developing children, 10 typically developing sex and age matched children and one of their parents or guardians will also be recruited from the catchment area. Passively sensed physiological indicators of stress are used as input to privacy preserving signal processing and machine learning algorithms, which predict OCD-episodes, clinical severity and family accommodation. Oxytocin, as a biomarker for family accommodation, is measured through saliva samples. Signal processing will be used to extract acoustic and physiological features of importance for therapeutic response.

Expected results: Results from the proposed project will be used to develop artificial intelligence (AI) tools that support clinicians, patients and parents, which will be implemented and evaluated in a public-sector hospital. Technology-enhanced therapy can be used in a stepped care model, in which subclinical symptoms are first monitored using passive sensors and then AI interventions are offered, supported by a healthcare professional, and when outpatient care is needed, the AI tool can support patient engagement. The results of this project will also advance research in computational science and psychiatry by testing biomarkers of clinical relevance.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients: seeking treatment at a child and adolescent mental health center. Controls: living in the catchment area of a the same child and adolescent mental health center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OCD (ICD-10 F42) as the primary or secondary diagnosis, verified with a semi-structured psychopathological interview using K-SADS-PL.
  • CY-BOCS > 7: mild (8-15), moderate (16-23), severe (24-31), extreme (32-40)
  • A psychiatrist determined that the child is eligible for care within psychiatry for their primary diagnosis.
  • Patient is age 8 through 17 years (both inclusive).
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in other OCD trials.
  • Comorbid illness that contraindicates trial participation: pervasive developmental disorder not including Asperger's syndrome (ICD-10 F84.0-84.4 + F84.8-84.9)), schizophrenia/paranoid psychosis (ICD-10 F20-25 + F28-29), mania or bipolar disorder (ICD-10 F30 and F31), depressive psychotic disorders (F32.3 + F33.3), substance dependence syndrome (ICD-10 F1x.2).
  • Intelligence Quotient <70.
  • Any condition (e.g. allergies, eczema, hypersensitivity due to Asperger's syndrome) that would prevent the child or parent from wearing a wristband biosensor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
  • OCD (ICD-10 F42) as the primary or secondary diagnosis, verified with a semi-structured psychopathological interview using Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS-PL).
  • CY-BOCS > 7: mild (8-15), moderate (16-23), severe (24-31), extreme (32-40)
  • A psychiatrist determined that the child is eligible for care within psychiatry for their primary diagnosis.
  • Patient is age 8 through 17 years (both inclusive).
The E4 wristband will be worn by all groups for the duration of the study. It measures blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and movement. Patients will be asked to press the event tagging button when they feel stressed by OCD. Control will be asked to press the button when they feel anxious. Parents will be asked to press the button with they notice their child feels stressed by OCD or anxious.
Other Names:
  • E4 wristband
One ERP session will be offered in Week 0 and Week 8.
Patients will receive treatment as usual at the child and adolescent mental health center. TAU can range from waitlist to one session of psychoeducation to group or individual psychotherapy to medication.
Controls
  • Ages 8 through 17 years (both inclusive).
  • Sex and age (+/- 3months) matched to an included patient.
The E4 wristband will be worn by all groups for the duration of the study. It measures blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and movement. Patients will be asked to press the event tagging button when they feel stressed by OCD. Control will be asked to press the button when they feel anxious. Parents will be asked to press the button with they notice their child feels stressed by OCD or anxious.
Other Names:
  • E4 wristband
Caregivers of Patients
Parent or guardian of patient with OCD
The E4 wristband will be worn by all groups for the duration of the study. It measures blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and movement. Patients will be asked to press the event tagging button when they feel stressed by OCD. Control will be asked to press the button when they feel anxious. Parents will be asked to press the button with they notice their child feels stressed by OCD or anxious.
Other Names:
  • E4 wristband
Caregivers of Controls
Parent or guardian of control participant
The E4 wristband will be worn by all groups for the duration of the study. It measures blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and movement. Patients will be asked to press the event tagging button when they feel stressed by OCD. Control will be asked to press the button when they feel anxious. Parents will be asked to press the button with they notice their child feels stressed by OCD or anxious.
Other Names:
  • E4 wristband

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Binary feasibility
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Binary feasibility outcomes in terms of recruitment, retention, biosensor functionality, acceptability of the biosensor, adherence to wearing the biosensor, adverse reactions to the biosensor, and physiological, audio, and visual signals as markers of OCD distress, severity and family dynamics. "Success" indicates that the a priori feasibility criteria have been met; "revise" indicates that the criteria have not been met.
Baseline to Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in KIDSCREEN-52
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 8
Self- and parent-ratings subjective health and well-being on 52 items on 10 subscales. Rasch scores are computed for each dimension (subscale) and are transformed into T-values with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and well-being.
Week 0 and Week 8

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression Severity and Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 0-8
Change in severity of psychopathology. At baseline, the one-item CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (severely ill). CGI-I scores range from 1 (large improvement) through to 7 (large increase in severity).
Week 0-8
Salivary oxytocin level-child
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 8
Concentration of oxytocin in child saliva calculated using Matlab-7 according to relevant standard curves.
Weeks 0 and 8
Salivary oxytocin level-parent
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 8
Concentration of oxytocin in parent saliva calculated using Matlab-7 according to relevant standard curves.
Weeks 0 and 8
Salivary oxytocin response-child
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 8
Change in oxytocin in child saliva.
Weeks 0 and 8
Salivary oxytocin response-parent
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 8
Change in oxytocin in parent saliva.
Weeks 0 and 8
Family Accommodation Scale - Parent Report (FAS-PR)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Self-rated degree of parental involvement in child OCD symptoms. 13-item measure with 4 subscales: Modifying routines, Participating in rituals, Parental distress caused by accommodating and Child consequences for not accommodating. Parents report the frequency of their accommodating behavior within the past week on 9 items and the severity of stress and consequences on 4 items on a five-point scale (0=never/no to 4= daily/extreme). Total and subscales scores are obtained by summing items.
Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Parental Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Self-rated degree of stress related to parenting identified child. 18 items rated on 5-point scales. Positively statements are reverse scored. Scores range between 18 and 90. Higher scores reflect greater stress.
Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Biosensor experience
Time Frame: Week 7
Children's and parents' level of physical (dis)comfort of wearing the wristband, degree of satisfaction with the design, concerns of stigmatization and data security as well as usability. There are 13 multiple choice questions answered on a 4-point scale (0 = disagree a lot - 3 = agree a lot ) and one open-ended question.
Week 7
Wristband compliance
Time Frame: Weeks 0 - 8
Number of hours parents and children wear the wristband
Weeks 0 - 8
Adverse reactions - wristband
Time Frame: Weeks 0-8
Negative effects of the wristband defined as the count of events reported by the parent, child or case worker.
Weeks 0-8
Subjective unit of distress
Time Frame: Week 0 and 8
Patients rate their level of distress on an 11-point scale (0= no distress; 10 = unbearable distress) during exposure and response prevention sessions.
Week 0 and 8
Symptom hierarchy
Time Frame: Week 0 and 8
Patients rate their level of distress associated with current OCD symptoms on an 11-point scale (0= no distress; 10 = unbearable distress) on a weekly basis.
Week 0 and 8
Biochemical synchrony
Time Frame: Week 0 and 8
Correlations between child and parent oxytocin level and response child and parent.
Week 0 and 8
Family Environment Scale - Parent Report (FES)
Time Frame: Weeks 0
Self-rated questionnaire in which parents report how they perceive their current family environment. 54 items from the following six subscales are used: 1. Cohesion, 2. Expressiveness, 3. Conflict, 4. Independence, 5. Organization, 6. Control. There are three FES forms (real, ideal, and expectations); only the FES real form will be used, which examines a family member's perception of the family as it is. The scale ranges from 10 to 40, with a score of 10 being representative of no family control and a score of 40 being representative of the greatest magnitude of family control. Therefore, a decrease in score represents a decrease in self-reported family control.
Weeks 0
KIDSCREEN-52
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 8
Health-related Quality of Life Screening Instrument for Children and Adolescents. Self- and parent-ratings subjective health and well-being on 52 items on 10 subscales. Rasch scores are computed for each dimension (subscale) and are transformed into T-values with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and well-being.
Week 0 and Week 8
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)
Time Frame: Weeks 0
42-item measure of negative emotional states in adults. Self-rated on a 4-point scale. Scores for Depression, Anxiety and Stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. Higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety and stress.
Weeks 0
Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) score
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 8
Semi-structured clinical interview that measures OCD symptom severity. 10 items, rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme severity), are summed to obtain a total score that can range from 0 to 40. An obsession severity score is obtained by summing the items 1-5. A compulsion severity score is obtained by summing items 6-10.
Week 0 and Week 8
OCD symptom remission
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 8
30% or more reduction in CY-BOCS score by Week 8. Dichotomous variable.
Week 0 and Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole N Lønfeldt, PhD, Capital Region of Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Line Katrine H Clemmensen, PhD, Technical University of Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Anne K Pagsberg, MD, PhD, Capital Region of Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-18010607- 79689

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Clinical Trials on wearable biosensor

3
Subscribe