- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05069259
Generate Real World Data On Tofacitinib Induction Therapy and Changes In Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes. (KIC-START)
A LOW-INTERVENTIONAL, PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER STUDY TO EVALUATE REAL-WORLD CLINICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND PATIENT-REPORTED RESPONSES TO TOFACITINIB INDUCTION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN SWITZERLAND
This study is expected to contribute to the body of real-world data of tofacitinib's safety and efficacy profile in ulcerative colitis. Conventional clinical outcomes will give a better understanding of response and remission rates in a representative, post-marketing population.
Regular patient questionnaires and measurement of a biomarker of gut inflammation will provide detail on how patients experience induction treatment and contextualise the efficacy data.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
- Phone Number: 1-800-718-1021
- Email: ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Clarunis, Universitätsspital
-
Bern, Switzerland, CH - 3012
- Recruiting
- Verein IBD Study Group
-
Fribourg, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Centre Fribourgeois de Gastroenterologie
-
Liestal, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Kantonsspital Baselland
-
Zuerich, Switzerland
- Not yet recruiting
- Zentrum für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie
-
Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
- Not yet recruiting
- University Hospital Zurich
-
Zurich, Switzerland
- Not yet recruiting
- University Hospital Zurich
-
-
Bern (de)
-
Bern, Bern (de), Switzerland, 3010
- Not yet recruiting
- Inselspital Bern
-
-
Sankt Gallen
-
St. Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
- Recruiting
- Kantonsspital St, Gallen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female participants 18 years of age or older at screening visit
- Participants with confirmed diagnosis of UC and who are prescribed tofacitinib (Xeljanz®) for moderately to severely active UC as per the Swiss label
- Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, study interventions, and other study procedures
- Capable of giving personally signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
- Any previous exposure to tofacitinib including participation in the tofacitinib clinical program
- Co-medication with any other advanced therapies for UC (biologics*, azathioprine, mercaptopurine and methotrexate) or any other JAK inhibitor
- Any identified contra-indications for use of tofacitinib as per the Swiss label
- Not owning a handheld digital device compatible with the Sidekick Health App, not willing to have it installed on this device or not capable of using the App
- Investigator site staff or Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study, site staff otherwise supervised by the investigator, and their respective family members.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Patients with active Ulcerative Colitis
|
collection for measuring calprotectin levels
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of participants achieving clinical response
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Partial Mayo Score from baseline of ≥2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of participants achieving clinical remission
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 16
|
Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1.
|
Week 8, Week 16
|
Proportion of participants achieving clinical response
Time Frame: Week 16
|
Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Partial Mayo Score from baseline of ≥2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Week 16
|
Proportion of participants achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 16
|
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission is defined as an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score ≥ 170. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire is a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life. |
Week 8, Week 16
|
Proportion of participants achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire response
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 16
|
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire response is defined as an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score ≥16 points higher than Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire baseline score.
|
Week 8, Week 16
|
Proportion of participants achieving biochemical remission
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 16
|
Biochemical remission is defined as a fecal calprotectin concentration ≤250 mg/g. Fecal calprotectin is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fecal calprotectin serves as a noninvasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
Week 8, Week 16
|
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentrations over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentrations over time.
Fecal calprotectin concentration is a continuous outcome.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by Week 8 clinical remission status
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by participants' Week 8 clinical remission status. Clinical remission status is either achieved or not achieved. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by Week 16 clinical remission status
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by participants' Week 16 clinical remission status. Clinical remission status is either achieved or not achieved. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by Week 8 clinical response status.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by participants' Week 8 clinical response status. Clinical response status is either achieved or not achieved. Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Partial Mayo Score from baseline of ≥2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by Week 16 clinical response status
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median fecal calprotectin concentrations over time stratified by participants' Week 16 clinical response status. Clinical response status is either achieved or not achieved. Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Partial Mayo Score from baseline of ≥2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Fecal calprotectin concentrations stratified by Week 8 clinical response status
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Median fecal calprotectin concentrations at Week 8 stratified by participants' Week 8 clinical response status. Clinical response status is either achieved or not achieved. Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Partial Mayo Score from baseline of ≥2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission is defined as Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2 with no subscore >1. |
Week 8
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and fecal calprotectin concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of patient reported outcomes and fecal calprotectin concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
There are eight individual patient reported outcomes: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, urgency of defecation, abdominal pain, quality of sleep, daily fatigue, weekly fatigue and quality of life.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of patient reported outcomes and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
There are eight individual patient reported outcomes: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, urgency of defecation, abdominal pain, quality of sleep, daily fatigue, weekly fatigue and quality of life.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score and fecal calprotectin concentration.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in stool frequency patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in each stool frequency patient-reported outcome over time. The stool frequency patient-reported outcome is assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore is used for scoring. Scores range from 0 to 3 and higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Each participant serves as his or her own control to establish the degree of abnormality of stool frequency. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in rectal bleeding patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in each rectal bleeding patient-reported outcome over time. The rectal bleeding patient-reported outcome is assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore is used for scoring. Scores range from 0 to 3 and higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Each participant serves as his or her own control to establish the degree of rectal bleeding. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in urgency of defecation patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline urgency of defecation patient-reported outcome over time. The Urgency of defecation patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale. Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe urgency. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in abdominal pain patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in abdominal pain patient-reported outcome over time. The abdominal pain patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Pain Numeric Rating Scale. Scoring is done on a 10-point horizontal numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in quality of sleep patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in quality of sleep patient-reported outcome over time. The quality of sleep patient-reported outcome is assessed with a question from the Sleep Quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate better quality of sleep. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in daily fatigue patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in daily fatigue patient-reported outcome over time. The daily fatigue patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Fatigue numeric rating scale. Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe fatigue. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in weekly fatigue patient-reported outcome over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Median change from baseline in each weekly fatigue patient-reported outcome over time. The weekly fatigue patient-reported outcome is assessed with 13 questions from the ("Additional concerns" section) FACIT-F (Version 4). Scoring is done on a Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Change from baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score over time.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire is a 32-item questionnaire on quality of life.
The total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score ranges from 32 to 224.
For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and stool frequency patient-reported outco
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
The stool frequency patient-reported outcome is assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day.
The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore is used for scoring.
Scores range from 0 to 3 and higher scores indicate more severe disease activity.
Each participant serves as his or her own control to establish the degree of abnormality of stool frequency.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and rectal bleeding patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
The rectal bleeding patient-reported outcome is assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day.
The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore is used for scoring.
Scores range from 0 to 3 and higher scores indicate more severe disease activity.
Each participant serves as his or her own control to establish the degree of rectal bleeding.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and urgency of defecation patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
The Urgency of defecation patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale.
Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale.
Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe urgency.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and abdominal pain patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Pain Numeric Rating Scale. Scoring is done on a 10-point horizontal numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain. Scoring is done on a 10-point horizontal numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and quality of sleep patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep patient-reported outcome is assessed with a question from the Sleep Quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate better quality of sleep. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and daily fatigue patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue patient-reported outcome is assessed with the Fatigue numeric rating scale. Scoring is done on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Participant can input a score from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe fatigue. |
Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations between changes in amplitude and timing of Partial Mayo Score and weekly fatigue patient-reported outcome.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
|
Correlations are assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
The weekly fatigue patient-reported outcome is assessed with 13 questions from the ("Additional concerns" section) FACIT-F (Version 4).
Scoring is done on a Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale.
Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue.
|
Baseline to Week 16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A3921395
- KIC-START (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis
-
Rise Therapeutics LLCUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Mayo ClinicRecruitingUlcerative Colitis | Ulcerative Colitis Chronic Moderate | Ulcerative Colitis Chronic | Ulcerative Colitis Chronic MildUnited States
-
Ferring PharmaceuticalsCompletedActive Ulcerative Colitis | Remission of Ulcerative ColitisCanada
-
Palatin Technologies, IncRecruitingUlcerative Colitis | Ulcerative Colitis Flare | Ulcerative Colitis Acute | UlcerativeUnited States
-
Theravance BiopharmaCompletedUlcerative Colitis, Active Severe | Ulcerative Colitis, Active ModerateUnited States, Georgia, Moldova, Republic of, Romania
-
Altheus Therapeutics, Inc.UnknownUlcerative Colitis | Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis | Distal Ulcerative ColitisUnited States
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...University Medical Center Groningen; UMC UtrechtRecruitingUlcerative Colitis | Ulcerative Colitis Flare | Ulcerative Colitis AcuteNetherlands
-
Immune PharmaceuticalsUnknownUlcerative Colitis, Active Severe | Ulcerative Colitis, Active ModerateIsrael
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisMRSU 938 - Research Center of Saint AntoineNot yet recruitingPediatric Ulcerative Colitis in RemissionFrance
-
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedUlcerative Colitis Chronic Moderate | Ulcerative Colitis Chronic SevereUnited States, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Poland, Russian Federation, Serbia, Ukraine
-
Theravance BiopharmaCompletedActive Mild Ulcerative Colitis, Active Moderate Ulcerative Colitis, Healthy SubjectsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Stool sample collection
-
Benjamin GesundheitShaare Zedek Medical CenterRecruiting
-
Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaCompletedAcute Leukemia | Chemotherapy-Induced Gut Barrier DamageUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedRotavirus GastroenteritisGreece
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteMaastricht University Medical Center; Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit...Completed
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, RotavirusBulgaria, Latvia
-
MaaT PharmaRecruitingSteroid Refractory GVHD | Intestinal GVHDFrance
-
Geneoscopy, Inc.Active, not recruitingColorectal Cancer | Polyp of Colon | Adenoma Colon | Advanced AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte, Ltd.National University Hospital, Singapore; University of Malaya; KK Women's and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealthySingapore, Malaysia, Thailand
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRecruiting