Large Macular Hole Closure Rate With Amniotic Membrane Graft With and Without Limitorrhexis

October 18, 2021 updated by: Jose Luis Rodriguez Loaiza, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana

Comparison of Macular Hole Closure Rate in Patients With Poor Prognosis Clinical Features Treated With Amniotic Membrane Graft With and Without Limitorrhexis

Patients with idiopathic macular holes (MHs) postoperative closure rates for large MHs (diameter > 550 μm) are disappointing and often require a second intervention, different techniques have been described with very variable success rates in different published studies, an efficient technique with good functional outcome has not been found.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Interventional study in large macular holes (diameter > 550 μm) using an amniotic membrane with and without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Not myopic patients (<6 Dioptre or <26 mm)
  • Large macular hole >550 μm
  • > 6 months symptoms
  • Signing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other ocular disease (diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, uveitis, ocular tumors, etc)
  • Using systemic drugs that are toxic for the optic nerve or retina (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen, ethambutol, etc)
  • Patients with ocular surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Amniotic membrane without internal limiting membrane peeling
The surgery performed will be phacoemulsification + vitrectomy using an amniotic membrane to plug the macular hole using air as tamponade.
Pars plana vitrectomy with/without internal limiting membrane peeling, amniotic membrane, and air tamponade
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Amniotic membrane with internal limiting membrane peeling
The surgery performed will be phacoemulsification + vitrectomy + internal limiting membrane peeling using an amniotic membrane to plug the macular hole using air as tamponade.
Pars plana vitrectomy with/without internal limiting membrane peeling, amniotic membrane, and air tamponade

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
% of macular hole clousure measured with OCT
Time Frame: 6 months
Closure of the macular hole by optical coherence tomography
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best-corrected visual acuity measured with Snellen Chart
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement of 2 lines in best-corrected visual acuity
6 months
Superficial and deep retinal capillary plexus density with OCT-A
Time Frame: 6 months
Presence of capillary plexus in macular hole area
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Rios Esquer, MD, INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA
  • Principal Investigator: Ishtar A Astorga Carballo, MD, INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA
  • Principal Investigator: Jose L Rodriguez Loaiza, MD, INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA
  • Principal Investigator: Zita Chao Loyo, MD, INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA
  • Principal Investigator: Felipe Esparza Correa, MD, INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 10, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAM CONDE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Holes

Clinical Trials on Macular hole closure with amniotic membrane with/without internal limiting membrane peeling

3
Subscribe