Testing a Family Service Navigator Program for Low-resourced Families of Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

February 6, 2024 updated by: Meghan Burke, Vanderbilt University
The purpose of this study is to develop and test a family navigator training and an app (a technology-based treatment support system) for low-resourced families of young children (aged 3-5) with autism. The hypothesis is that the navigator training and treatment support system will help enable navigators to support families of young children with autism in accessing needed services.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this project is to determine whether access to a family service navigator/treatment support system improves outcomes among families of young children (aged 3-5) from low-resourced communities. Pilot work includes interviews and pre/post surveys. Then, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted by randomly assigning families to navigators/treatment support systems or the non-personalized comparison condition (information, training, and referral services). Three-month, six-month, and nine-month follow-up survey data will be collected. Each of the 20 navigators will support two families. Intervention families will have access to the navigator and the treatment support system, which includes a dashboard showing their child's service needs, resources, and a platform to facilitate and document communication between navigators and families. The treatment support system will also allow the navigator supervisor to ensure fidelity of the navigators' support to the family. The statistician will randomize 55 families who meet the inclusionary criteria to each condition--40 individuals will receive navigator/treatment support system (intervention group) and 15 individuals will receive information, training, and referrals (comparison group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Champaign, Illinois, United States, 61820
        • Recruiting
        • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
        • Contact:
          • Meghan M Burke

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

For the families in the clinical trial, there are the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Be a parent who is in some way from a low-resourced community,
  • Be the parent a child with autism between the ages of 3-5,
  • Be age 18 or older,
  • Want assistance with navigating service delivery systems,
  • Be English speaking or Spanish-speaking,
  • Be able to provide informed consent,
  • Own a phone which can use the treatment support system (or be provided a phone from the Public Assistance Office or from the grant)

Exclusion criteria:

-Individuals who do not meet all inclusion criteria are by definition excluded.

For the navigators in the clinical trial, they must meet inclusion and exclusion criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agree to participate in the navigator training and become an navigator,
  • Be a parent who is in some way from a low-resourced community,
  • Be the parent a child with autism who is older than 5,
  • Be age 18 or older, Be English speaking,
  • Be able to provide informed consent,
  • Own a phone which can use the treatment support system (or be provided a phone from the Public Assistance Office or from the grant)

Exclusion criteria:

-Individuals who do not meet all inclusion criteria are by definition excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (Access to an FSN/TSS)
40 participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (i.e., to receive an FSN and have access to the TSS). The FSN may meet with the participant at least twice and provide navigation support.
An RCT will be conducted. 40 participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group and 15 participants to the non-personalized comparison group (i.e., information, training, and referral). The intervention group will have access to a navigator and the treatment support system.
No Intervention: Control Group (Access to Information, training and referral)
15 participants will be randomly assigned to the non-personalized comparison group (i.e., information, training, and referral).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Knowledge at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Autism Knowledge Scale, a multi-item measure examining knowledge of autism services. There are 24 items with higher scores indicating more knowledge. Scale ranges from 0-24.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Skills at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Comfort with Advocacy Scale, A multi-item measure examining skills to identify, access, and receive services. There are 12 items with higher scores indicating greater advocacy. Scale ranges from 0 to 60.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Advocacy at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Advocacy Skills Scale, a multi-item measure examining the frequency of advocacy activities. There are nine items with higher scores indicating greater advocacy. Scale ranges from 9 to 45.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Empowerment at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Family Empowerment Scale, aa multi-item measure examining empowerment in family, services, and community/political environments. There are 34 items with higher scores indicating greater empowerment. Scale ranges from 0 to 136.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Parenting self-efficacy at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Self-Efficacy scale, a multi-item measure examining competence in parenting. There are nine items with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Scale ranges from 0 to 36.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Service Delivery Outcomes
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the three-month, six-month, and nine-month survey
Called the adapted service measure scale, access to the type, number, and quality of services and unmet service needs. There are over 20 services with higher scores indicating needing greater services. Scale ranges from 0 to 20.
At the pre-survey and at the three-month, six-month, and nine-month survey
Change in Adaptive and maladaptive behavior at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, a multi-item measure examining adaptive and maladaptive behavior. There are 100 items with higher scores indicating greater adaptive behavior. Scale ranges from 0 to 100.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Change in Social responsiveness at 9 months
Time Frame: At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey
Called the Social Responsiveness Scale, a multi-item measure to examine social responsiveness. There are sixty items with higher scores indicating greater social responsiveness. Scale ranges from 0 to 180.
At the pre-survey and at the nine-month survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meghan Burke, PhD, Vanderbilt University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Magana, S., et al., Use of promotoras de salud in interventions with Latino families of children with IDD. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2014. 47: p. 39-75
  • Burke, M.M. and S.E. Goldman, Special education advocacy among culturally and linguistically diverse families Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2018. 1: p. 3-14.
  • Maas, C.J. and J.P. Hox, Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 2005. 1: p. 86- 92.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing of data generated by this project will be an important part of the proposed activities of this research and will be carried out in several ways. All research resources developed in this project will be made readily available to the scientific community for non-profit research purposes. The main mechanism for the transfer of information will take the form of peer-reviewed publications and presentations/posters at scientific conferences. Information is collected from participants upon enrollment will be generated to a Global Unique Identifier. Annual reports with de-identified information will be presented to National Institute of Mental Health annually and more often upon request. By the completion of the project, all data will be de-identified and relevant documentation to facilitate data sharing will be available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

7/2022-4/2025

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Access to a Family Service Navigator and Treatment Support System

3
Subscribe