- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05149651
Efficacy of Totalfill® and ProRoot MTA® as Pulpotomy Agent in Primary Molars
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Pulpotomy of Primary Molars Using Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty, and ProRoot White MTA®. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
When a tooth decay is too deep and extended into the tooth pulp, then the tooth is not indicated to be treated with a filling. Therefore, removing the diseased pulp and then cover the rest with a suitable material is required. The Purpose of this study is to check the success of pulp treatment on deciduous molars with deep caries using 2 pulp treatment agents: (Totalfill® and MTA®). The use between the materials is randomly assigned. However, the use of the materials has no side effect or complications as it is a routine dental procedure.
The participants are healthy children aged between 3 and 9 years old, and the study is taking place in Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, and it is planned to be conducted in duration of 4 years, which include 20 months for participants recruitment.
After placing the material, the tooth is restored with stainless steel crowns, and the participant was asked for follow up to check the tooth and to take dental x-ray every 6 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- Ghent University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient inclusion criteria
- ASA 1 patient, Patient is a completely healthy & fit. No allergy or medical conditions.
- Patient is indicated for treatment under General Anesthesia: young age, uncooperative and extensive treatment plan.
- Parent agreed to participate in the study, and signed the written consent.
- Patient attended the out-patients pediatric dental clinic in UZ Gent.
Tooth inclusion criteria 2.1. Clinical inclusion criteria:
- Vital primary molars (first or second) with deep caries cavity with pulpal exposure.
- Only mandibular primary molar were included
- No spontaneous pain
- No history of swelling
- No sinus tract/ fistula
- Absent of tenderness in percussion
- No pathological mobility
- Restorable tooth (stainless steel crown can be placed)
- Hemostasis can be achieved with a dry cotton pellet after removal of Coronal pulp.
2.2. Radiographical inclusion criteria:
- At least 2/3rd of root is present
- Absence of internal or external root resorption
- Absence of pathologic root resorption
- Absence of periapical or furcation radiolucency
Exclusion Criteria:
If one or more of the criteria mentioned above is not fulfilled, the teeth were excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Totalfill
Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
|
Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty is a pre-mixed, bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: MTA
ProRoot White MTA® used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
|
ProRoot White MTA® is a bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Clinical evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn & Seale (2008).
Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
|
6 months follow-up
|
Clinical evaluation
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn & Seale (2008).
Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
|
12 months follow-up
|
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn & Seale (2008).
Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
|
6 months follow-up
|
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn & Seale (2008).
Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
|
12 months follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time needed to place the material
Time Frame: Immediately after each intervention for a maximum of the intervention
|
To measure the time consumed to place each material and then to compare them if there is a significant difference.
After removing the coronal pulp and achieving the hemostasis .
The operator start the timer when he places the material till restoring the tooth with GIC.
|
Immediately after each intervention for a maximum of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- EC UZG 2016/0723 - 2016/0724
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Extensively Decayed Primary Molars
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedDecayed Primary MolarsEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownBadly Decayed Lower First Primary Molars in Children
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationActive, not recruitingPulpotomies on Primary MolarsIsrael
-
Ahmad ElheenyCompletedIatrogenic Perforation of Primary MolarsEgypt
-
Minia UniversityCompletedInfected Root Canals of Primary Molars
-
Ahmad ElheenyCompletedRoot Canal Preparation of Infected Primary MolarsEgypt
-
Ahmad ElheenyCompletedRestoration of Primary Molars With CAD/CAM CrownsEgypt
-
University GhentCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedExtensive Decay in Primary Molars
Clinical Trials on Totalfill
-
Minia UniversityCompletedEffect of Material and TechniqueEgypt
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeCompletedRoot Canal ObturationSingapore
-
Kuwait Institute for Medical SpecializationMinistry of Health, Kuwait; Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of SciencesCompletedPostoperative Pain | Randomized Clinical Trial | Root Canal Obturation | Root Canal Filling | Sealer-based Obturation | Resin Based Sealer | Warm Vertical CompactionKuwait
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted