Interventions in Mathematics and Cognitive Skills

August 3, 2023 updated by: Vinod Menon, Stanford University

Interventions in Math Learning Disabilities: Cognitive and Neural Correlates

The purpose of this study is to investigate neurocognitive mechanisms underlying response to intervention aimed at enhancing, and remediating weaknesses in, numerical skills in children, including those with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to investigate neurocognitive mechanisms underlying response to intervention aimed at enhancing, and remediating weaknesses in, numerical skills in children, including those with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD).

To achieve this goal, investigators will use a theoretically-motivated integrated symbolic/non-symbolic (iSNS) intervention with a randomized controlled design to enhance cross-format mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of quantities. The investigators will develop innovative computational models to investigate individual differences in latent cognitive processes and brain plasticity that contribute to learning, long-term retention, and transfer in children.

The investigators will assess performance in several areas and investigate cognitive and neural mechanisms that support numerical skill acquisition in children with differing levels of math learning abilities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience Laboratory
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vinod Menon, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hyesang Chang, Ph.D.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Elementary school aged children starting from first grade (6-12 years old)
  2. IQ: Participants with a Full Scale IQ > 70 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI-II).
  3. Identification of Mathematical Learning Disabilities: Scores below the 25-35th percentile percentile on symbolic number processing test in Numeracy Screener and two or more Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-IV) math subtests
  4. Identification of typically developing children: Scores at or above the 25-35th percentile percentile on symbolic number processing test in Numeracy Screener and all WIAT-IV math subtests
  5. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and no hearing impairments
  6. Inclusion in MRI scan session: Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of neurological or psychiatric disorder (i.e., schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.)
  2. History of trauma involving head injury
  3. Consistent psychiatric medications
  4. Exclusion from MRI scan session: No major contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - braces, metal implants, pacemakers, vascular stents, metallic ear tubes, consistent exposure to metal, claustrophobia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Integrative Symbolic Non-Symbolic (iSNS) Training
Integrative symbolic non-symbolic (iSNS) training: Over a period of 6 weeks, participants will complete activities that progressively strengthen the mapping of symbolic numerical representations to non-symbolic numerical quantities and enhance fluency in symbolic numerical skills.

After study participants have completed screenings to meet our inclusion criteria, participants will take part in the pre-training MRI brain scan (if eligible) and behavioral assessments and will then be assigned to the intervention for 6 weeks.

During this training, participants will spend three days each week completing a set of problems at their home on a tablet that we provide them. Participants will receive one-to-one training with a member of our research team once a week.

Following the completion of the 6-week training program, participants will be asked to complete a second MRI brain imaging session (for those who completed pre-training MRI) and post-measure appointments in order to assess immediate effects of the training program. Participants will also be invited to return for follow-up testing after six months in order to assess the long- lasting effects of the training program.

Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Active Control Intervention (Working Memory Training)
Active control intervention: Over a period of 6 weeks, participants will complete activities that enhance short-term storage and maintenance of visuospatial or verbal information.

After study participants have completed screenings to meet our inclusion criteria, participants will take part in the pre-training MRI brain scan (if eligible) and behavioral assessments and will then be assigned to the intervention for 6 weeks.

During this training, participants will spend three days each week completing a set of problems at their home on a tablet that we provide them. Participants will receive one-to-one training with a member of our research team once a week.

Following the completion of the 6-week training program, participants will be asked to complete a second MRI brain imaging session (for those who completed pre-training MRI) and post-measure appointments in order to assess immediate effects of the training program. Participants will also be invited to return for follow-up testing after six months in order to assess the long- lasting effects of the training program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in symbolic number comparison task performance (reaction time)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's reaction time (milliseconds) on symbolic number comparison task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in symbolic number comparison task performance (accuracy)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's accuracy (% trials correct) on symbolic number comparison task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in non-symbolic number comparison task performance (reaction time)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's reaction time (milliseconds) on non-symbolic number comparison task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in non-symbolic number comparison task performance (accuracy)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's accuracy (% trials correct) on non-symbolic number comparison task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in latent cognitive measures of symbolic number comparison task performance (drift rate)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Latent cognitive processing will be measured by drift rate from children's symbolic number comparison task performance
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in latent cognitive measures of symbolic number comparison task performance (post-error adjustment)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Latent cognitive processing will be measured by post-error adjustment from children's symbolic number comparison task performance
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in latent cognitive measures of non-symbolic number comparison task performance (drift rate)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Latent cognitive processing will be measured by drift rate from children's non-symbolic number comparison task performance
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in latent cognitive measures of non-symbolic number comparison task performance (post-error adjustment)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Latent cognitive processing will be measured by post-error adjustment from children's non-symbolic number comparison task performance
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in brain activation during symbolic number comparison task performance
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Neural activity will be measured during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) symbolic number comparison task. Data will consist of beta values from individual subject contrast maps for Near vs Far contrast from the whole-brain GLM fMRI analysis.
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in brain activation during non-symbolic number comparison task performance
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Neural activity will be measured during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) non-symbolic number comparison task. Data will consist of beta values from individual subject contrast maps for Near vs Far contrast from the whole-brain general linear model (GLM) fMRI analysis.
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in functional connectivity during symbolic addition task performance
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Mean functional connectivity between ventrotemporal occipital cortex (VTOC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), medial temporal lobe (MTL), and basal ganglia (BG) regions during symbolic addition fMRI task will be assessed. Data will consist of generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) beta values from individual subject contrast maps for Hard vs. Easy contrast for the regions of interest (VTOC, PPC, PFC, MTL, BG).
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in symbolic addition task performance (reaction time)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's reaction time (milliseconds) on symbolic addition task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in symbolic addition task performance (accuracy)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Performance will be measured by children's accuracy (% trials correct) on symbolic addition task
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in functional connectivity during symbolic number comparison task performance
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Mean functional connectivity between ventrotemporal occipital cortex (VTOC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), medial temporal lobe (MTL), and basal ganglia (BG) regions during symbolic number comparison fMRI task will be assessed. Data will consist of generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) beta values from individual subject contrast maps for Near vs. Far contrast for the regions of interest (VTOC, PPC, PFC, MTL, BG).
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Change from baseline in functional connectivity during non-symbolic number comparison task performance
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Mean functional connectivity between ventrotemporal occipital cortex (VTOC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), medial temporal lobe (MTL), and basal ganglia (BG) regions during non-symbolic number comparison fMRI task will be assessed. Data will consist of generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) beta values from individual subject contrast maps for Near vs. Far contrast for the regions of interest (VTOC, PPC, PFC, MTL, BG).
Baseline and post-intervention (after 6 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Interventions in Mathematics and Cognitive Skills - Experimental

3
Subscribe