- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05897619
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Cognitive Behavioral Skills Mobile App for Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals
September 29, 2023 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Pilot Trial Assessing Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Cognitive Behavioral Skills Mobile App for a Perinatal Population
This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App, a novel app for pregnant and postpartum individuals experiencing difficulties with mood, anxiety, or stress.
Participants will complete the 12-module app to learn evidence-based strategies previously shown to help manage mood and anxiety.
Assessments will include app feedback questionnaires, feedback interviews, a daily symptom tracker, and symptom measures.
The study investigators hypothesizes that participants will find content to be helpful in developing skills to manage anxiety and mood difficulties during the perinatal period, and that the app interface, session structure, and pacing will be acceptable and feasible for this population.
It is further hypothesized that increased Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App use, engagement, and satisfaction will be associated with lower self-reported anxiety and mood symptoms.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Individuals who are pregnant or postpartum are at a high risk of anxiety and mood difficulties.
This has been linked to negative effects on the individual, developing baby (both in the womb and after birth), and family system.
Despite this, there are significant barriers to getting mental health support while pregnant or as a new parent, particularly for those in disadvantaged communities.
This study seeks to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel mobile health app among individuals who are pregnant or postpartum.
The Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App has been adapted from a previously studied Maya Cognitive Behavioral Skills App to specifically address the unique experiences of the perinatal population.
The app includes 12 skill-based sessions using principles from cognitive behavioral therapy, an evidence-based treatment that can effectively address anxiety and mood symptoms.
The app will be tested by pregnant and postpartum individuals, who will provide feedback on feasibility and acceptability.
Participants will also complete screening measures assessing anxiety, mood, and trauma, which will be examined in the context of app use and engagement.
Participants will be recruited from a range of settings in hopes of capturing a diverse sample in terms of race, cultural background, and financial means.
Results will be used to inform future versions of the app to better suit this population.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Andrea Temkin-Yu, Psy.D.
- Phone Number: (640) 203-8301
- Email: abt4002@med.cornell.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Aliza Ayaz, B.S.
- Email: ala4015@med.cornell.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Recruiting
- Weill Cornell Medical College
-
Contact:
- Aliza Ayaz, B.S.
- Email: ala4015@med.cornell.edu
-
Contact:
- Andrea Temkin-Yu, Psy.D.
- Phone Number: 640-203-8301
- Email: abt4002@med.cornell.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Andrea Temkin-Yu, Psy.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female, Trans-male, non-binary, gender expansive, or gender questioning gestational carriers of pregnancy
- Currently pregnant or up to 12 months postpartum
- 18 years or older
- English proficiency
- Have access to a smartphone or other mobile device capable of receiving Short Message Service (SMS) pushes and complete Qualtrics surveys and App modules
- Be available to speak by phone or secure video-conference platform at points throughout the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Safety concerns at the time of enrollment, including, but not limited to, a response >0 on the EPDS question 10 or reported suicidal or self-harm thoughts or behaviors within one year of enrollment
- Current substance use disorder
- History of a bipolar or psychotic disorder, or current symptoms of psychosis or mania.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App
Participants receive the Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App for 6 weeks.
|
The intervention includes the completion of a mobile skills app teaching evidence-based strategies tailored for perinatal mood and anxiety.
Modules include psychoeducation, skill information, practice exercises, and homework.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at midpoint
Time Frame: Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app.
Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).
|
Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at post-intervention
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app.
Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at follow-up
Time Frame: Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app.
Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).
|
Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 1 (approximately week 1)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 1 (approximately week 1)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 2 (approximately week 1)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 2 (approximately week 1)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 3 (approximately week 2)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 3 (approximately week 2)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 4 (approximately week 2)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 4 (approximately week 2)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 5 (approximately week 3)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 5 (approximately week 3)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 6 (approximately week 3)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 6 (approximately week 3)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 7 (approximately week 4)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 7 (approximately week 4)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 8 (approximately week 4)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 8 (approximately week 4)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 9 (approximately week 5)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 9 (approximately week 5)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 10 (approximately week 5)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 10 (approximately week 5)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 11 (approximately week 6)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 11 (approximately week 6)
|
Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Module 12 (approximately week 6)
|
Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.
|
Module 12 (approximately week 6)
|
Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at midpoint
Time Frame: Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant.
Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.
|
Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at post-intervention
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant.
Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at follow-up
Time Frame: Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant.
Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.
|
Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in postnatal depression measures scores from baseline to midpoint as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).
Time Frame: Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 30 with the following interpretation: 0-7 (depression not likely), 8-13 (depression possible), 14+ (depression probable).
|
Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
Changes in postnatal depression measures scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 30 with the following interpretation: 0-7 (depression not likely), 8-13 (depression possible), 14+ (depression probable).
|
Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in postnatal depression measures scores from midpoint to post-intervention as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).
Time Frame: Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 30 with the following interpretation: 0-7 (depression not likely), 8-13 (depression possible), 14+ (depression probable).
|
Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in postnatal depression measures scores from post-intervention to follow-up as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks).
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 30 with the following interpretation: 0-7 (depression not likely), 8-13 (depression possible), 14+ (depression probable).
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks).
|
Changes in postnatal anxiety measures scores from baseline to midpoint as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A).
Time Frame: To be completed at midpoint at approximately 3 weeks, post-intervention at approximately 6 weeks, and follow-up and approximately 12 weeks.
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
The Edinburgh Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A) uses three items from the EPDS to assess levels of anxiety among perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 9, with scores of 6+ indicating likely anxiety.
|
To be completed at midpoint at approximately 3 weeks, post-intervention at approximately 6 weeks, and follow-up and approximately 12 weeks.
|
Changes in postnatal anxiety measures scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A).
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
The Edinburgh Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A) uses three items from the EPDS to assess levels of anxiety among perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 9, with scores of 6+ indicating likely anxiety.
|
Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in postnatal anxiety measures scores from midpoint to post-intervention as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A).
Time Frame: Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
The Edinburgh Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A) uses three items from the EPDS to assess levels of anxiety among perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 9, with scores of 6+ indicating likely anxiety.
|
Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in postnatal anxiety measures scores from post-intervention to follow-up as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report measure of mood symptoms in perinatal individuals.
The Edinburgh Anxiety Subscale (EPDS 3A) uses three items from the EPDS to assess levels of anxiety among perinatal individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 9, with scores of 6+ indicating likely anxiety.
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Changes in anxiety measures scores from baseline to midpoint as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of anxiety.
Scores range from 0 to 21 with the following interpretation: 0-4 (minimal anxiety), 5-9 (mild anxiety), 10-14 (moderate anxiety), 15-21 (severe anxiety).
|
Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
Changes in anxiety measures scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of anxiety.
Scores range from 0 to 21 with the following interpretation: 0-4 (minimal anxiety), 5-9 (mild anxiety), 10-14 (moderate anxiety), 15-21 (severe anxiety)
|
Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in anxiety measures scores from midpoint to post-intervention as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of anxiety.
Scores range from 0 to 21 with the following interpretation: 0-4 (minimal anxiety), 5-9 (mild anxiety), 10-14 (moderate anxiety), 15-21 (severe anxiety)
|
Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks), post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in anxiety measures scores from post-intervention to follow-up as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of anxiety.
Scores range from 0 to 21 with the following interpretation: 0-4 (minimal anxiety), 5-9 (mild anxiety), 10-14 (moderate anxiety), 15-21 (severe anxiety)
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Change in depression measures scores from baseline to midpoint as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of depression.
Scores range from 0 to 27 with the following interpretation: 1-4 (minimal depression), 5-9 (mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression), 20-27 (severe depression).
|
Baseline, midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
|
Change in depression measures scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of depression.
Scores range from 0 to 27 with the following interpretation: 1-4 (minimal depression), 5-9 (mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression), 20-27 (severe depression).
|
Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Change in depression measures scores from midpoint to post-intervention as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Midpoint, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of depression.
Scores range from 0 to 27 with the following interpretation: 1-4 (minimal depression), 5-9 (mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression), 20-27 (severe depression).
|
Midpoint, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Change in depression measures scores from post-intervention to follow-up as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9 item self-report measure assessing symptoms of depression.
Scores range from 0 to 27 with the following interpretation: 1-4 (minimal depression), 5-9 (mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression), 20-27 (severe depression).
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), Follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Changes in perinatal trauma measure scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II)
Time Frame: To be completed at midpoint at approximately 3 weeks, post-intervention at approximately 6 weeks, and follow-up and approximately 12 weeks.
|
The Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II) is a 14-item self-report measure assessing symptoms of trauma among postpartum individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 56, with scores of 19+ distinguishing individuals in need of treatment to address symptoms.
|
To be completed at midpoint at approximately 3 weeks, post-intervention at approximately 6 weeks, and follow-up and approximately 12 weeks.
|
Changes in perinatal trauma measure scores from baseline to post-intervention as measured by Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
The Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II) is a 14-item self-report measure assessing symptoms of trauma among postpartum individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 56, with scores of 19+ distinguishing individuals in need of treatment to address symptoms.
|
Baseline, post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)
|
Changes in perinatal trauma measure scores from post-intervention to follow-up as measured by Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
The Perinatal-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQ-II) is a 14-item self-report measure assessing symptoms of trauma among postpartum individuals.
Scores range from 0 to 56, with scores of 19+ distinguishing individuals in need of treatment to address symptoms.
|
Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks), follow-up (approximately 12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrea Temkin-Yu, Psy.D., Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Murray L. The impact of postnatal depression on infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;33(3):543-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00890.x.
- Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):698-709. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f. Erratum In: Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1344.
- Pearlstein T, Howard M, Salisbury A, Zlotnick C. Postpartum depression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.033.
- Wisner KL, Sit DK, McShea MC, Rizzo DM, Zoretich RA, Hughes CL, Eng HF, Luther JF, Wisniewski SR, Costantino ML, Confer AL, Moses-Kolko EL, Famy CS, Hanusa BH. Onset timing, thoughts of self-harm, and diagnoses in postpartum women with screen-positive depression findings. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 May;70(5):490-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87.
- Dennis CL, Chung-Lee L. Postpartum depression help-seeking barriers and maternal treatment preferences: a qualitative systematic review. Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):323-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00130.x.
- Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1071-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db.
- Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller WC. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2005 Feb;(119):1-8. doi: 10.1037/e439372005-001. No abstract available.
- Gjerdingen DK, Yawn BP. Postpartum depression screening: importance, methods, barriers, and recommendations for practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):280-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060171.
- Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster JY, Bruyere O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Womens Health (Lond). 2019 Jan-Dec;15:1745506519844044. doi: 10.1177/1745506519844044. Erratum In: Womens Health (Lond). 2019 Jan-Dec;15:1745506519854864.
- Furtado M, Chow CHT, Owais S, Frey BN, Van Lieshout RJ. Risk factors of new onset anxiety and anxiety exacerbation in the perinatal period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.073. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
- Goodman SH, Gotlib IH. Risk for psychopathology in the children of depressed mothers: a developmental model for understanding mechanisms of transmission. Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):458-90. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.458.
- Tietz A, Zietlow AL, Reck C. Maternal bonding in mothers with postpartum anxiety disorder: the crucial role of subclinical depressive symptoms and maternal avoidance behaviour. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Oct;17(5):433-42. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0423-x. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
- Trost SL, Beauregard JL, Smoots AN, Ko JY, Haight SC, Moore Simas TA, Byatt N, Madni SA, Goodman D. Preventing Pregnancy-Related Mental Health Deaths: Insights From 14 US Maternal Mortality Review Committees, 2008-17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Oct;40(10):1551-1559. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00615.
- Wisner KL, Hanusa BH, Perel JM, Peindl KS, Piontek CM, Sit DK, Findling RL, Moses-Kolko EL. Postpartum depression: a randomized trial of sertraline versus nortriptyline. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;26(4):353-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227706.56870.dd.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 19, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 1, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
June 9, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 3, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 29, 2023
Last Verified
September 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-10025299
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Perinatal Depression
-
Sameera ShafiqNot yet recruitingPerinatal Depression | Perinatal AnxietyPakistan
-
Massachusetts General HospitalPositive Intelligence Inc.Not yet recruitingPerinatal Depression | Perinatal Anxiety
-
Children's National Research InstitutePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; George Washington UniversityRecruitingPerinatal Depression | Prenatal Stress | Perinatal AnxietyUnited States
-
Hamad Medical CorporationTerminatedSpecific Phobia | Perinatal Depression | Perinatal AnxietyQatar
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNot yet recruitingPerinatal Depression
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Palo Alto UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliRecruiting
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Active, not recruiting
-
Kaiser PermanenteNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Emory University; University of Toronto and other collaboratorsCompletedPerinatal DepressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Experimental: Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App
-
University of PittsburghWithdrawnPsychosis | Prodromal Symptoms | Prodromal Stage | Prodromal StatesUnited States
-
University of Missouri, St. LouisNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Ohio State UniversityCompleted
-
University of CalgaryUniversity of California, San Diego; The Zucker Hillside HospitalCompletedAt Risk of PsychosisCanada
-
Henry Ford Health SystemCompleted
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsTerminatedSchizophrenia | AgingUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingCognitive Dysfunction | Cognitive Change | Learning Disabilities | Individuality | Child Development | Developmental Disability | Behavior | Cognition | Learning Curve | Decision Making | Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms | Behavior, Child | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Cognition Disorder | Neuroscience | Cognitive Orientation and other conditionsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalTelefónica S.A.CompletedBody Dysmorphic DisordersUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemRecruitingDepression | InsomniaUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)Completed