- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05236192
New Parent Support Program Evaluation
Navy and Marine Corps New Parent Support Program Evaluation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Navy and Marine Corps' NPSP home visiting option assists families who are at risk for child abuse and neglect by providing those families with home visitation by a trained professional (e.g., licensed clinical social worker, nurse). The ultimate goal of NPSP home visiting is to promote strong parenting practices and healthy families by providing parents with skills to foster child development and well-being. Families, expecting a child and with children up to age three, participating in the NPSP home visiting services at select military installations will be recruited for a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid Type 2 design program evaluation, which simultaneously tests the implementation and client related outcomes of a program (Curran et al., 2012).
Rigorous program evaluations of Navy and Marine Corps NPSP home visiting services are lacking. In fact, only one published study evaluating Navy NPSP could be located (Kelley et al., 2006). While the results of Kelley et al.'s (2006) study were generally positive, it was a single-group retrospective design that did not assess implementation outcomes or program outcomes related to child maltreatment. Thus, that study's ability to inform NPSP home visiting services is limited. Further, findings from past analyses of Army NPSP offered no evidence that NPSP services directly prevent child abuse and neglect (Kaye, Faber, Schiavone, & Perkins, 2016). Among the general U.S. population, research findings are mixed with regard to the effectiveness of home visiting programs for preventing child maltreatment (Howard & Brooks-Gunn, 2009; Kaminski, Valle, Filene, & Boyle, 2008). However, the available evidence does indicate that these programs can positively alter parenting practices.
Without a rigorous, experimental evaluation, it is difficult to assess whether the Navy's and Marine Corps' NPSP service as usual (SAU) is having the intended impacts on participating families. Further, the both Services are interested in exploring the utility of delivering the Take Root Home Visitation (TRHV) program. TRHV is a newly developed, evidence-informed, secondary, home-visiting prevention program developed by researchers at the Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State in collaboration with the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and Family Policy. TRHV has not been evaluated within the context of the Navy or Marine Corps. TRHV has been implemented with the Army as part of the Clearinghouse's three-phase evaluation of Army NPSP. Though the final report is still forthcoming, a preliminary report on program implementation showed that home visitors found TRHV to be acceptable and were able to implement the program with fidelity (Kaye et al., 2021). Moreover, parents receiving TRHV reported high levels of satisfaction with the program and stayed in NPSP services longer than parents receiving SAU (Kaye et al., 2021).
The extent to which the Army TRHV implementation findings generalize to the Navy and Marine Corps is unclear. Additionally, it is unclear to what extent TRHV will impact program outcomes, especially when compared to SAU. This study is designed to help bring clarity to these issues.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ryan P Chesnut, PhD
- Phone Number: 8148659637
- Email: rpc5108@psu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 16802
- Recruiting
- The Pennsylvania State University
-
Contact:
- Ryan P Chesnut, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ryan P Chesnut, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Daniel F Perkins, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria (NPSP Participants):
- 18+ years old
- Stationed at one of the participating military installations
- Active duty, retired, National Guard or Reserves service member or spouse/partner
- Pregnant or have a child 0-3-years-old
- Eligible to receive NPSP home-visiting services
- Speak and understand English proficiently
Inclusion Criteria (NPSP Home Visitors):
- 18+ years old
- Working at one of the participating military installations as a NPSP home visitor
- Speak and understand English proficiently
Inclusion Criteria (NPSP Participants' Children):
- Children of active duty, retired, National Guard or Reserves service member or spouse/partner receiving NPSP home-visiting services
- 0-3-years-old
Exclusion Criteria (NPSP Participants):
- Younger than 18 years of age
- Not stationed at one of the participating military installations
- Not an active duty, retired, National Guard or Reserves service member or spouse/partner
- Not currently pregnant or the parent of a child 0-3-years-old
- Not eligible for NPSP home-visiting services
- Does not speak or understand English proficiently
Exclusion Criteria (NPSP Home Visitors):
- Younger than 18 years of age
- Not employed at one of the participating military installations as a NPSP home visitor
- Does not speak or understand English proficiently
Exclusion Criteria (NPSP Participants' Children):
- Not the child of an active duty, retired, National Guard or Reserves service member or spouse/partner receiving NPSP home-visiting services
- Older than 3 years of age
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Take Root Home Visitation (TRHV)
TRHV is an evidence-informed, manualized home-visiting curriculum.
|
TRHV is a home-visiting, standardized program that home visitors can use to structure their time spent with families during home visits.
|
Active Comparator: Services as Usual (SAU)
SAU involves the current standard of care implemented at the participating Navy and Marine Corps installations.
|
SAU includes an installation's current NPSP home visiting practice, which may vary across the installations participating in this study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (BCAP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
The BCAP is the short form of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI), which assesses potential risk for child abuse.
Scores range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater risk.
|
Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Child Maltreatment Incident Report
Time Frame: Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
Administrative data will be collected to determine if a child maltreatment incident has occurred.
|
Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
Change in Ages & Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
ASQ-3 is a standardized measure of child development across five domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal-social.
Questionnaires are based on child age (and prematurity status).
Scores range from 0-60 within each domain with higher scores reflecting typical development.
Raw scores within each domain are classified into typical development, monitoring, and referral categories based upon established cut-off criteria.
|
Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Change in Parenting Skills Assessment 10th Edition (PSA-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
PSA-10 is an observational tool designed to measure parenting skills across five domains: communication with child, child management and supervision, parent/child activities, nurturing, and enriched environment.
Domain scores range from 5 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater competence in that skill area.
|
Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Change in Family Needs Screener (FNS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
FNS is a family violence risk screener that assess 10 factors: demographics, stress, relationship discord, support, substance abuse, violence approval, family of origin violence and neglect, self-esteem, depression, and prior family violence.
Scores for item scale item are dichotomized and summed such that total scores range from 0 to 53 with a score of 9 or higher being classified as high needs.
|
Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Change in Protective Factors Survey (PFS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
PFS assesses the presence of factors known to buffer against child maltreatment, such as family functioning, emotional support, concrete support, and nurturing and attachment.
Subscale scores range from 1 to 7 with higher scores reflecting greater protection.
|
Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Change in Parental Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
PSS assesses four aspects of parenting stress: parental rewards, parental stressors, lack of control, and parental satisfaction.
Subscale scores can be computed, but most often, a total score, ranging from 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress), is calculated.
|
Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
CESD-10 is a brief measure that assesses depressive symptoms over the prior week.
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater depression.
|
Baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: 6-7 months post-baseline and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
CSQ-8 measures clients' satisfaction with the services they have received.
Scores range from 8 to 32 with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction.
|
6-7 months post-baseline and NPSP service or study completion completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Client Engagement Survey (CES)
Time Frame: 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
CES is a measure of clients' engagement with the services they are receiving.
Four domains of engagement are assessed: receptivity (score range: 4 to 20), buy-in (score range: 9 to 40), working relationship (score range: 4 to 20), and mistrust (score range: 3 to 15).
The total engagement score ranges from 20 to 95 with higher scores reflecting greater engagement.
|
3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
EBPAS assesses providers' attitudes regarding the adoption of new treatments, interventions, and practices.
Four domains are measured: requirements, appeal, openness, and divergence.
Subscale scores and the total score are calculated by averaging the appropriate items, so scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more of the construct of interest.
|
Baseline
|
Treatment Fidelity
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Brief checklists will be used to assess NPSP home visitors' adherence to the program model.
|
Baseline, 3-4 months post-baseline, 6-7 months post-baseline, and NPSP service or study completion (whichever occurs first - study completion is approximately 12 months post-baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Program Reach
Time Frame: Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
Family Advocacy Program (FAP) managers will be asked to provide the percentage of eligible families who received TRHV and SAU.
|
Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
Program Penetration
Time Frame: Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
FAP managers will be asked to provide the percentage of eligible home visitors who delivered TRHV and SAU.
|
Study completion, which is approximately 12 months post-baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ryan P Chesnut, PhD, The Pennsylvania State University
- Principal Investigator: Daniel F Perkins, PhD, The Pennsylvania State University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
- Kaminski JW, Valle LA, Filene JH, Boyle CL. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 May;36(4):567-89. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
- Kelley, M. L., Schwerin, M. J., Farrar, K. L., & Lane, M. E. (2006). A participant evaluation of the U.S. Navy parent support program. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-006-9031-5
- Kaye, M. P., Faber, A., Schiavone, W., & Perkins, D. F. (2016). New Parent Support Program Engagement Phase II Final Report. University Park, PA: Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State.
- Kaye, M. P., Ferrara, A. M., Abram-Erby, G., Kotch, R., Gernon, S., & Perkins, D. F. (2021, April). Take Root Home Visitation implementation: Army New Parent Support Program (NPSP) EIII. University Park, PA: Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State.
- Howard KS, Brooks-Gunn J. The role of home-visiting programs in preventing child abuse and neglect. Future Child. 2009 Fall;19(2):119-46. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0032.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00019356
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Maltreatment
-
Karolinska InstitutetActive, not recruitingChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentSweden
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayOral Health Center of Expertise Rogaland, Norway; Childrens advocacy center... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child MaltreatmentNorway
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity of California, San Diego; Chestnut Health SystemsActive, not recruiting
-
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty...Department of Education Northern IrelandCompletedEvaluating the Effectiveness of Keeping Safe - a School Based Intervention Aimed at Preventing AbuseChild MaltreatmentUnited Kingdom
-
Georgia State UniversityCenters for Disease Control and Prevention; University of GeorgiaCompletedChild MaltreatmentUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthWithdrawn
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedChild MaltreatmentUnited States
-
Duke UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingUnspecified Child Maltreatment, Suspected | Unspecified Child Maltreatment, ConfirmedUnited States
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Oak Foundation; UBS Optimus Foundation; Trickle... and other collaboratorsCompletedChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentBurkina Faso
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingParent-Child Relations | Parenting | Child Behavior | Child MaltreatmentUnited States
Clinical Trials on Take Root Home Visitation (TRHV)
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Active, not recruitingObesity | Obesity, Childhood | Obesity; FamilialUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive Behavior | Child RearingUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); The Colorado TrustCompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive Behavior | Child RearingUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); U.S. Department of JusticeCompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive Behavior | Child Rearing
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingOptimizing Access to Care During Pregnancy in Rural Areas in a Perinatal Health Network (OPTI'SOINS)Pregnancy | Living in an Isolated AreaFrance
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
Baylor College of MedicineTexas Department of Family Protective ServicesRecruiting
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedChild MaltreatmentUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverSmith-Richardson FoundationCompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive BehaviorUnited States
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...University of Colorado, DenverCompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive Behavior | Child Rearing | Adolescent DevelopmentUnited States