- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05237908
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages (PRINTLIF)
Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study for the Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome and the Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical study is a regulatory Post Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) measure and is aiming to collect clinical data on the performance and safety of the TSPACE® 3D implants. It is designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-interventional study in order to gain clinical data within the routine clinical application of the investigational device.
The study shall answer the question if there are detectable differences between the established titanium coated Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) cages of the manufacturer and the new 3D printed cages. Differences shall be observed in terms of clinical outcome, quality of life, patient satisfaction, radiological outcome and occurrence of Adverse Events / Serious Adverse Events.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Stefan Maenz, Dr.
- Phone Number: +49746195
- Email: stefan.maenz@aesculap.de
Study Locations
-
-
Hessen
-
Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60389
- Recruiting
- BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main
-
Contact:
- Frank Kandziora, Prof. Dr. med.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for one, two or three-segment lumbar interbody fusion according to Instructions for use
- Written informed consent for the documentation of clinical and radiological results
- Willingness and mental ability to participate at the follow-up examinations
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is not willing or able to participate at the follow-up examination
- Patient age < 18 years and >80 years
- Patient is pregnant
- Previous instrumented lumbar spine surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
TSPACE 3D
the 3D printed cage (TSPACE 3D) is defined as investigational product
|
Interbody Fusion means the operative immobilization or ankylosis of two or more vertebrae by fusion of the vertebral bodies with a short bone graft or often with diskectomy or laminectomy.
(From Blauvelt and Nelson, A Manual of Orthopaedic Terminology, 5th ed, p236; Dorland, 28th ed
|
TSPACE XP
the titanium coated PEEK cage (TSPACE XP) is defined as reference product.
|
Interbody Fusion means the operative immobilization or ankylosis of two or more vertebrae by fusion of the vertebral bodies with a short bone graft or often with diskectomy or laminectomy.
(From Blauvelt and Nelson, A Manual of Orthopaedic Terminology, 5th ed, p236; Dorland, 28th ed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Clinical outcome measured with the Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
|
The Oswestry Disability Index is designed to measure back-specific disability.
The questionnaire is self-administered and has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling.
It is a self-administered questionnaire Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 is for maximum disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the total score by the total possible score, which is multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100).
Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
|
1 year postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Clinical improvement: pain
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
Pain will be assessed by the patient using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain"
|
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
Development Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 5-dimension 5-level measure of the health status and is developed by the EuroQol Group in order to have a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment.
In order to analyze the quality of life of the patients, the EQ-5D-5L is used.
The score is self-completed by the patient and will therefore be used in German.
|
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
Radiological outcome: Fusion
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
|
Bone fusion: After interbody fusion surgery fusion of the treated segment is aspired.
Thus, the implant design shall allow on-/ingrowth to/into the material.
The fusion status can be determined from radiographs (static or dynamic).
Bony fusion can be characterized quantitatively by the fusion rate.
|
1 year postoperatively
|
Radiological outcome: Implant subsidence
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
|
Implant penetration into the vertebral body occurs frequently after spinal reconstruction.
Interbody fusion cages may subside into the vertebral body and lead to kyphotic deformity
|
1 year postoperatively
|
Radiological outcome: Implant migration
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
|
Interbody fusion cages might migrate forward into the retroperitoneum or backwards into the vertebral canal and can, thus, cause serious clinical consequences (e.g.
compression of nerve roots or dura mater).
|
1 year postoperatively
|
Rate of (Serious) adverse events
Time Frame: throughout the studies duration up to five years postoperatively
|
Occurrence of complications potentially associated with the implanted devices can never be fully excluded during spinal surgery.
In order to monitor potential complication and to identify so far unknown complications adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) deemed related to the investigational device are recorded.
|
throughout the studies duration up to five years postoperatively
|
Development of Clinical outcome measured with the Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.
|
The Oswestry Disability Index is designed to measure back-specific disability.
The questionnaire is self-administered and has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling.
It is a self-administered questionnaire Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 is for maximum disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the total score by the total possible score, which is multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100).
Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
|
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
Duration of the intervention from first cut to suturing
|
Intraoperative
|
Blood loss
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
Amount of Blood loss due to the intervention
|
intraoperative
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to patient's discharge from hospital (approximately 5 days postoperatively)
|
Number of days the patient has to stay in hospital after the intervention
|
up to patient's discharge from hospital (approximately 5 days postoperatively)
|
Development of Patient satisfaction over time
Time Frame: Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
|
The satisfaction of the patient with the spine intervention is evaluated at all postoperative examinations
|
Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
|
Return to work status
Time Frame: Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
|
Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAG-O-H-2114
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Disk Herniated Lumbar
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeCompleted
-
NEOS SurgeryCompleted
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedDisk Herniated Lumbar | Spinal Stenosis LumbarKorea, Republic of
-
Spine Centre of Southern DenmarkUniversity of Southern DenmarkUnknownLumbar Herniated DiskDenmark
-
M3 HealthIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao PauloNot yet recruitingHerniated Disk LumbarBrazil
-
St. Anna Clinic LuzernCompleted
-
Hospital San José, ChileHospital Clínico La FloridaCompletedLow Back Pain | Disk Herniated LumbarChile
-
Spine Centre of Southern DenmarkWithdrawn
-
Muş Alparlan UniversityCompletedIntervertebral Disc Displacement | Disk Herniated Lumbar | Disc HerniationTurkey
Clinical Trials on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
-
Pei-Yuan Lee, MDAeon Biotechnology CorporationUnknownSpinal Fusion | Bone MarrowTaiwan
-
ExactechTerminatedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylolisthesis | StenosisUnited States
-
Spine and Scoliosis Research AssociatesEnrolling by invitationDegenerative Disc Disease (DDD)United States
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalUnknownDegenerative Spondylolisthesis | Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionKorea, Republic of
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Premia SpineActive, not recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Justin Parker Neurological InstituteCompletedDegenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
The London Spine CentreUnknownSpinal Stenosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisCanada
-
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and EducationCoreLink, LLCCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease Lumbar
-
SpineVisionEVAMEDRecruitingIntervertebral Disc DegenerationFrance, Switzerland