Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages (PRINTLIF)

July 19, 2023 updated by: Aesculap AG

Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study for the Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome and the Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study for the Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome and the Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical study is a regulatory Post Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) measure and is aiming to collect clinical data on the performance and safety of the TSPACE® 3D implants. It is designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-interventional study in order to gain clinical data within the routine clinical application of the investigational device.

The study shall answer the question if there are detectable differences between the established titanium coated Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) cages of the manufacturer and the new 3D printed cages. Differences shall be observed in terms of clinical outcome, quality of life, patient satisfaction, radiological outcome and occurrence of Adverse Events / Serious Adverse Events.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

78

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60389
        • Recruiting
        • BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main
        • Contact:
          • Frank Kandziora, Prof. Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will be recruited consecutively. No selection besides the inclusion and exclusion criteria will take place.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for one, two or three-segment lumbar interbody fusion according to Instructions for use
  • Written informed consent for the documentation of clinical and radiological results
  • Willingness and mental ability to participate at the follow-up examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is not willing or able to participate at the follow-up examination
  • Patient age < 18 years and >80 years
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Previous instrumented lumbar spine surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TSPACE 3D
the 3D printed cage (TSPACE 3D) is defined as investigational product
Interbody Fusion means the operative immobilization or ankylosis of two or more vertebrae by fusion of the vertebral bodies with a short bone graft or often with diskectomy or laminectomy. (From Blauvelt and Nelson, A Manual of Orthopaedic Terminology, 5th ed, p236; Dorland, 28th ed
TSPACE XP
the titanium coated PEEK cage (TSPACE XP) is defined as reference product.
Interbody Fusion means the operative immobilization or ankylosis of two or more vertebrae by fusion of the vertebral bodies with a short bone graft or often with diskectomy or laminectomy. (From Blauvelt and Nelson, A Manual of Orthopaedic Terminology, 5th ed, p236; Dorland, 28th ed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcome measured with the Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
The Oswestry Disability Index is designed to measure back-specific disability. The questionnaire is self-administered and has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling. It is a self-administered questionnaire Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 is for maximum disability. The index is calculated by dividing the total score by the total possible score, which is multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
1 year postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical improvement: pain
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
Pain will be assessed by the patient using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain"
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
Development Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 5-dimension 5-level measure of the health status and is developed by the EuroQol Group in order to have a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment. In order to analyze the quality of life of the patients, the EQ-5D-5L is used. The score is self-completed by the patient and will therefore be used in German.
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
Radiological outcome: Fusion
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
Bone fusion: After interbody fusion surgery fusion of the treated segment is aspired. Thus, the implant design shall allow on-/ingrowth to/into the material. The fusion status can be determined from radiographs (static or dynamic). Bony fusion can be characterized quantitatively by the fusion rate.
1 year postoperatively
Radiological outcome: Implant subsidence
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
Implant penetration into the vertebral body occurs frequently after spinal reconstruction. Interbody fusion cages may subside into the vertebral body and lead to kyphotic deformity
1 year postoperatively
Radiological outcome: Implant migration
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
Interbody fusion cages might migrate forward into the retroperitoneum or backwards into the vertebral canal and can, thus, cause serious clinical consequences (e.g. compression of nerve roots or dura mater).
1 year postoperatively
Rate of (Serious) adverse events
Time Frame: throughout the studies duration up to five years postoperatively
Occurrence of complications potentially associated with the implanted devices can never be fully excluded during spinal surgery. In order to monitor potential complication and to identify so far unknown complications adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) deemed related to the investigational device are recorded.
throughout the studies duration up to five years postoperatively
Development of Clinical outcome measured with the Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.
The Oswestry Disability Index is designed to measure back-specific disability. The questionnaire is self-administered and has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling. It is a self-administered questionnaire Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 is for maximum disability. The index is calculated by dividing the total score by the total possible score, which is multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Duration of the intervention from first cut to suturing
Intraoperative
Blood loss
Time Frame: intraoperative
Amount of Blood loss due to the intervention
intraoperative
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to patient's discharge from hospital (approximately 5 days postoperatively)
Number of days the patient has to stay in hospital after the intervention
up to patient's discharge from hospital (approximately 5 days postoperatively)
Development of Patient satisfaction over time
Time Frame: Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
The satisfaction of the patient with the spine intervention is evaluated at all postoperative examinations
Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
Return to work status
Time Frame: Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)
Throughout the postoperative examinations (at each follow-up 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years postoperative)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disk Herniated Lumbar

Clinical Trials on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

3
Subscribe