Does Steroid Plus CO2 Laser Improve Lichen Sclerosus Symptoms Compared to Steroids Alone?

December 6, 2023 updated by: University of South Alabama

A Randomized, Unblinded Trial of Topical Steroids Plus CO2 Laser Compared to Steroids Alone in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Lichen Sclerosus

This study will compare the effects of fractionated CO2 laser plus topical steroids versus topical steroids alone in treatment of lichen sclerosus.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Vulvar lichen sclerosus is a common benign skin condition which causes pain and itching. Topical steroids have been the main treatment. A recent study showed that fractionated CO2 laser treatment is non inferior and actually may improve subjective symptoms compared to topical steroids with no serious safety or adverse events. Because steroids reduce risk of vulvar cancer in patients with lichen sclerosus, the investigators hypothesize that steroids in addition to the fractionated laser will provide greater symptom relief while still allowing patient the benefits of steroid treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36604
        • Recruiting
        • USA Health Children's and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Charles Hanes, MD
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36604

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women with biopsy proven lichen sclerosus and significant symptoms based on Skindex-29 scores >21

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior vaginal mesh or pelvic radiation
  • active genital infection
  • Current or past gynecologic malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fractionated CO2 laser plus topical steroids
3 laser treatments at 6 week intervals for 6 months by a single trained operator
3 laser treatments at 6 week intervals for 6 months by a single trained operator
Other Names:
  • SMARTXIDE2
self-applied topical steroid therapy using clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Other Names:
  • clobetasol propionate
Active Comparator: topical steroids alone
self-applied topical steroid therapy using clobetasol propionate 0.05%
self-applied topical steroid therapy using clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Other Names:
  • clobetasol propionate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Skindex-29 score
Time Frame: Completed by the subject at baseline and 6 months.
The Skindex-29 is a validated tool to assess impact of a chronic skin condition on a person's quality of life. It has been previously used to describe the effects of a treatment and to compare treatments. Values range from 1 (Never) to 5 (All the time). The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Completed by the subject at baseline and 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Objective Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Scored by the provider at baseline and 6 months
Providers will use this scale to objectively assess vulvar appearance. The tool uses is scored from 0 to 3 (0= absent, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe) on nine different features of lichen sclerosus (white plaques or hypopigementation, cigarette paper or thin skin, introital narrowing, perianal involvment, loss of labia minora, fusion of labia minora, vulvar fissures, and vulvar erosion). A higher score indicates a higher severity. A higher change in score indicates greater improvement.
Scored by the provider at baseline and 6 months
Global Subjective Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Scored by the provider at 6 months
Providers will use this scale to subjectively assess improvement in vulvar appearance. The provider will grade the improvement from baseline on a 6 point scale, with 0 being "much worse" and 5 being "much better".
Scored by the provider at 6 months
Change in Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ) score (Total Score)
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
This 21 item questionnaire assess four aspects impacting quality of life for patients with vulvovaginal skin diseases: symptoms, emotions, life impact and sexual impact. A higher score corresponds to more bothersome symptoms. The values are 0 (No) or 1 (Yes). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A higher change in these scores indicates more improvement.
Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
Change in Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire score (Symptoms Component only)
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
A subset of the total score on the VSQ, looking at symptoms only. A higher score corresponds to more bothersome symptoms. The values are 0 (No) or 1 (Yes). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A higher change in these scores indicates more improvement.
Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
Change in Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire score (Emotion Component only)
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
A subset of the total score on the VSQ, looking at scores for emotions questions only. A higher score corresponds to more emotional impact. The values are 0 (No) or 1 (Yes). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A higher change in these scores indicates more improvement.
Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
Change in Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire score (Life Impact Component only)
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
A subset of the total score on the VSQ, looking at scores for life impact questions only. A higher score corresponds to more impact. The values are 0 (No) or 1 (Yes). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A higher change in these scores indicates more improvement.
Administered at baseline and at 6 months by the provider.
Change in Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire score (Sexual Impact Component only)
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and 6 months by an investigator to the subject
A subset of the total score on the VSQ, looking at scores for sexual impact questions only. A higher score corresponds to more impact. The values are 0 (No) or 1 (Yes). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A higher change in these scores indicates more improvement.
Administered at baseline and 6 months by an investigator to the subject
Patient reported satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: Administered by an investigator to the subject at 6 months.
5 point scale of satisfaction: 0 = very unsatisfied, 1 = unsatisfied, 2 = neutral, 3 = satisfied, 4 = very satisfied
Administered by an investigator to the subject at 6 months.
Change in symptom subjective visual analog score
Time Frame: Administered at baseline and 6 months by an investigator to the subject
This measures the subjects perception of 9 key vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, irritation, pain with intercourse, tearing of vulvar skin, painful urination and painful defecation. Each is scored from 0 -10, with 10 indicating the most symptoms.
Administered at baseline and 6 months by an investigator to the subject

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles Hanes, MD, Adjunct Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Varner, MD, Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 13, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Clinical Trials on MonaLisa Touch

3
Subscribe