Examining the Effectiveness of DermGEN™ in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in First Nations People

July 26, 2022 updated by: Dr. Paul F. Gratzer, DeCell Technologies Inc.

Examining the Effectiveness of DermGEN™ Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in First Nations People Living in Northwestern Ontario Communities

The study will examine the effectiveness of a decellularized dermal matrix (i.e., DermGEN™) in improving wound healing, quality of life and associated costs of treatment of DFUs in First Nations people living in the Northwestern Ontario Communities. First Nations people with active diabetic foot (DFU) ulcer attending a wound care clinic located at the Rainy River district office. An interventional, two-arm, randomized, prospective study of (1) standard of care (control) vs. (2) DermGEN™ - a decellularized dermal matrix (treatment) will be used in the treatment and management of DFU. Patients will be randomized to each arm (n=60 per arm) based on power calculations using data from our Pilot study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Emo, Ontario, Canada, P0W 1C0
        • Northwestern Ontario (NWO) Wound Care Centre of Excellence
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant and social support (e.g., family, caregiver) ready and willing to participate and comply with follow-up regime
  • Participant willing to be involved in self-care (e.g., keep dressing dry at home) required during treatment
  • Participant willing to wear Total Contact Cast (TCC) for wound off-loading during treatment
  • Participant or legal representative has read and signed the informed consent form
  • Documented stable Type I or II diabetes (HbA1C between 5.0 to 10 mmol/L within 1 month prior to Day 0)
  • Ulcer has been present for a minimum of 2 weeks as of Day 0
  • Ulcer area is ≥2 cm2 prior to debridement at Day 0 of study
  • Ulcer extends through dermis and into subcutaneous tissue but without exposure of muscle, tendon, bone or joint capsule
  • Ulcer is free of dead tissue and clinical infection, and is comprised of healthy vascular tissue suitable for skin grafting on Day 0
  • Adequate perfusion to the extremity determined by at least one of the following:

Palpable pedal pulses, Transcutaneous oxygen measurement at the dorsum of the foot ≥30 mm Hg, Ankle-brachial index ranging from 0.8 to 1.2, At least biphasic Doppler arterial waveforms at the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The individual has any condition that seriously compromises their capacity to provide consent and answers questions related to this study.
  • Untreated infection of soft tissue or bone and/or autoimmune connective tissue disorders
  • Ulcer is over Charcot deformity (joints deformity of foot and ankle common in people with diabetes)
  • Body mass index ≥50 kg/m2
  • Ulcer is not classified as diabetes-related
  • Ulcer has tunnels or sinus tracts that cannot be completely debrided
  • Medical condition(s) that in the investigators' opinion make the patient inappropriate for study (e.g active liver disease)
  • Presence of malignant disease not in remission for 5 years or more
  • The individual is undergoing chemotherapy/radiation therapy
  • The individual received radiation therapy within 30 days of Day 0 of study
  • The individual is taking an immunosuppressant medication (e.g., corticosteroids, immunosuppression or cytotoxic agents), or is anticipated to require such agents during study
  • Presence of acute or chronic hepatitis, liver disease, anemia, serum albumin <2.0 gm/dL, or has alkaline phosphatase or LDH at twice the normal upper limit
  • Obvious clinical signs and symptoms of ongoing tissue infection (i.e., cellulitis) or bone infection (i.e., osteomyelitis)
  • Female individuals are pregnant at time or intend to get pregnant during study time
  • The individual has known allergies to antibiotics, such as penicillin and streptomycin
  • The individual is an active smoker (smoke one or more cigarette a day)
  • The individual has a history of a bleeding disorder or is taking blood thinner medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard of Care
The standard of care includes physical examination, wound debridement, total cast or offloading boot, non-adherent dressing (PolyMem®) for wound covering, weekly visit for ongoing assessment
debridement, wound dressings, offloading
EXPERIMENTAL: DermGEN™
A decellularized dermal matrix created from donated human skin. This arm will receive the same care as the Standard of Care control arm-physical examination, wound debridement, total cast or offloading boot, non-adherent dressing (PolyMem®) for wound covering, weekly visit for ongoing assessment-with the addition of DermGEN™ onto the wound at the first visit.
Decellularized human dermal matrix created from donated human skin
Other Names:
  • Acellular Dermal Matrix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean and median reduction in wound area in the first 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
4 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)
8 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)
12 weeks
Incidence of adverse events.
Time Frame: Reports included at any time up to and including 20 weeks post treatment.
Number of adverse events observed for each arm divided by participants in each arm, reported as a percentage
Reports included at any time up to and including 20 weeks post treatment.
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 1 week
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
1 week
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
2 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
3 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
4 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
8 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
12 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
20 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
4 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
8 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
12 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion with complete healing at any time point
Time Frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Number of wounds closed (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)at any time divided by the number of participants in each arm reported as a percentage
up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Time to first-measured complete healing
Time Frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Time to first-measured complete healing (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)
up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Mean and median reduction in wound area at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
8 weeks
Mean and median reduction in wound area at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul F Gratzer, Ph.D., Dalhousie University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

3
Subscribe