Improving Neurotrauma by Depolarization Inhibition With Combination Therapy (INDICT) (INDICT)

September 11, 2023 updated by: Jed Hartings, University of Cincinnati

Improving Neurotrauma by Depolarization Inhibition With Combination Therapy (INDICT): a Phase 2 Randomized, Feasibility Trial

This study is a randomized Phase 2 trial to determine the feasibility of real-time electrocorticographic monitoring of spreading depolarizations (SD) to guide implementation of a tier-based protocol of intensive care therapies, aimed at SD suppression, for the management of patients who have undergone acute operative treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of acute TBI treatment is to minimize secondary damage that evolves over hours to days after the primary injury. Until now, however, there have been no methods for monitoring heterogeneous pathologic mechanisms to identify patients for appropriate neuroprotection therapies. Using invasive monitoring, investigators have documented that spreading depolarizations (SD), a cytotoxic dysfunction of cerebral gray matter that has been well-characterized through 60 years of research in animal models, are the dominant pathophysiologic process in peri-lesion cortex of many, but not all, severe TBI patients. Furthermore, it was found that the occurrence of SD as a secondary injury process in patients is an independent predictor of worse neurologic outcomes. Thus, monitoring of SD as a heterogeneous mechanism in TBI may allow selective use of therapy in only those patients who might benefit.

Here the investigators will conduct a randomized Phase 2 feasibility trial that uses real-time SD monitoring to guide implementation of a tier-based protocol of intensive care therapies aimed at SD suppression. The study is based on the hypothesis that outcomes from severe TBI can be improved by targeting intensive care therapies to suppress the pathology of SDs as a brain marker and mechanism of secondary injury. The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of this approach to intensive care management of severe TBI in a Phase 2 trial that uses real-time SD monitoring to guide administration of prescribed therapies to suppress SD. The aims are to (1) determine the feasibility of real-time SD monitoring to guide intensive care management of severe TBI, and (2) determine the effect of SD-guided vs. standard care management to reduce secondary brain insults in severe TBI.

This is a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial enrolling approximately 72 patients at 3 sites. Patients requiring neurological surgery for emergency treatment of TBI will be enrolled. The need for surgery allows for the placement of an electrode strip on the brain during surgery for subsequent electrocorticography (ECoG). ECoG data will be monitored continuously in real-time for the occurrence of SDs during intensive care. When SDs are observed, these patients (~60%, or n=43) will be randomized 1:1 to either standard (control) or SD-guided care. In the standard care arm, treatment will follow local and national guidelines with blinding to further ECoG results. In the SD-guided arm, treatment will follow a tiered-based protocol with escalation and de-escalation based on efficacy to suppress further SD pathology. Treatments will include use of ketamine sedation and adjusted targets for plasma glucose, cerebral perfusion pressure, temperature, and end-tidal CO2.

As outcomes, the accuracy of real-time SD scoring and compliance with protocol tier assignment and therapy implementation will be assessed. The burden of SD pathology, other measures of cerebral physiology (intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures, and brain oxygenation), and medical complications will also be compared between the two study arms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • Recruiting
        • University of Cincinnati
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) clinical indication for emergency craniotomy with dural opening to treat acute TBI within 72 hr post-trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. persistent bilateral non-reactive pupils or other evidence of non-survivable injury,
  2. decompressive craniectomy to treat refractory ICP subsequent to diffuse injury, (3) co-enrollment in another therapeutic TBI trial, and

(4) pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SD-Guided Care
In this arm, ECoG data will be reviewed for SDs in real-time using the bedside clinical CNS monitor. As a secondary measure, recognition of SDs will be facilitated by custom software on a laptop that receives data from the CNS monitor. Data on SD occurrence will be used to guide treatment in a tier-based therapeutic escalation and de-escalation protocol with the goal of SD suppression. Therapies to be used among the tiers include adjusted targets for MAP, CPP, PaCO2, plasma glucose, temperature, as well as ketamine pharmacotherapy. Changes between tiers are determined by the success or failure of SD suppression at the given treatment level.
Diagnosis of spreading depolarizations in continuous electrocorticography
Protocol for escalation and de-escalation of physiologic-targeted and pharmacologic therapies to treat and prevent spreading depolarizations
No Intervention: Standard ICU Care

Management in the Standard ICU Care arm will follow published national guidelines consisting of common ICU-based targets for physiologic intervention that are thought to mitigate the development of secondary brain injuries.

Continuous ECoG monitoring will be performed for seizure monitoring, but information on the course of SDs in these patients will not be used to guide care. To enforce blinding to SD-related ECoG data, the ECoG bedside software will be locked with password protection to prevent displays with frequency filtering and time/amplitude scales that are necessary to identify SDs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burden of spreading depolarizations
Time Frame: During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
Spreading depolarization events will be scored based on review of electrocorticographic recordings. The number of depolarizations per recording day over the period of monitoring will serve as the measure of total burden. The burdens computed for patients will be compared between the two randomization arms.
During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burden of elevated intracranial pressure
Time Frame: During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
The time integral of the continuously monitored intracranial pressure signal above 22 mmHg will be computed for each patient as the measure of burden. The burdens computed for patients will be compared between the two randomization arms.
During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
Burden of cerebral hypoxia
Time Frame: During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
The time integral of the continuously monitored cerebral oxygenation below 20 mmHg will be computed for each patient as the measure of burden. The burdens computed for patients will be compared between the two randomization arms.
During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
Burden of low cerebral perfusion
Time Frame: During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
The time integral of the continuously monitored cerebral perfusions pressure below 60 mmHg will be computed for each patient as the measure of burden. The burdens computed for patients will be compared between the two randomization arms.
During the period of intensive care invasive monitoring, up to two weeks after injury
Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended
Time Frame: 6 months post-injury
Scores on the GOS-E will be compared between the two randomization arms
6 months post-injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). Data will also be shared through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Registry (FITBIR).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Full-band Electrocorticography

3
Subscribe