Burst Crossover Trial

May 22, 2023 updated by: St. Olavs Hospital

Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Crossover Trial

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely applied therapy to treat chronic neuropathic pain, and one of the most common indications is persisting radicular neuropathic pain following lumbar spine surgery. In traditional SCS therapies, the objective has been to replace the pain sensation with paresthesia. The anticipation is that the electrical current alters pain processing by masking the sensation of pain with a comfortable tingling or paresthesia. Although patients mostly cope with paresthesia, a significant proportion reports that the sensation is unpleasant.

'Burst' SCS utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli. This SCS technique seems to provide paresthesia-free stimulation, resulting in better pain relief of low back and leg pain then traditional tonic stimulation.

The widespread use of SCS has not been backed by solid evidence. The absence of placebo-controlled trials has long been an important point of criticism, but due to the nature of the intervention with sensation of paresthesia, studies with placebo control have so far not been considered possible. When 'burst' SCS is used the stimulation is often unnoticed by the patient, allowing comparison with placebo stimulation.

The aim of this randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 'burst' spinal cord stimulation for chronic radicular pain following spine surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • St Olavs Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Sasha Gulati, md phd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have undergone ≥1 back surgeries and developed chronic radicular pain that has remained refractory to non-surgical treatment for ≥6 months
  • Minimum pain intensity of 5/10 on the leg pain NRS at baseline
  • Successful two-week SCS testing period with tonic stimulation (≥2 points reduction in leg pain NRS from baseline). This means patients will experience paresthesia during the SCS trial period
  • Mandatory assessment at the Multidisciplinary outpatient clinic for back-, neck- and shoulder rehabilitation, St. Olavs University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coexisting conditions that would increase procedural risk (e.g., sepsis, coagulopathy)
  • History of laminectomy or posterior fusion at the thoracolumbar junction, where percutaneous electrode end tips are routinely placed.
  • Abnormal pain behavior and/or unresolved psychiatric illness.
  • Unresolved issues of secondary gain or inappropriate medication use.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Burst SCS
Burst Spinal cord stimulation. SCS system implanted and burst stimulation given
Burst stimulation utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli of a 40 Hz burst mode with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per spike delivered in a constant current mode
No spinal cord stimulation is provided

a subcutaneously implantable pulse generator ("pacemaker") for long-term therapy.

The following system from Abbott will be implanted: ProclaimTM XR implantable pulse generator and Octrode® 8-contact lead

Sham Comparator: Sham SCS
Sham spinal cord stimulation. SCS system implanted but no stimulation given.
Burst stimulation utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli of a 40 Hz burst mode with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per spike delivered in a constant current mode
No spinal cord stimulation is provided

a subcutaneously implantable pulse generator ("pacemaker") for long-term therapy.

The following system from Abbott will be implanted: ProclaimTM XR implantable pulse generator and Octrode® 8-contact lead

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in disease-specific functional outcome from baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
measured with version 2.0 of the Oswestry disability index (ODI) that has been translated into Norwegian and tested for psychometric properties. The ODI questionnaire quantifies disability for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine and covers intensity of pain, ability to lift, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. The index is scored from 0 to 100. Zero means no disability and 100 reflects maximum disability.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in generic health-related quality of life measured with the Euro-Qol-5D (5L)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change in back pain
Time Frame: 12 months
measured using numerical rating scales (NRS)
12 months
change in leg pain
Time Frame: 12 months
measured using numerical rating scales (NRS)
12 months
Daily physical activity
Time Frame: 12 months
measured by use of a body-worn accelerometer (activPALs from PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, United Kingdom) attached by a waterproof tape to the midpoint of the patients' anterior right thigh
12 months
Health Care Provider's Costs
Time Frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness (cost per gained quality-adjusted life year)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sasha Gulati, md prof, St. Olavs Hospital
  • Study Director: Geir Bråthen, md prof, St. Olavs Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 15, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation

3
Subscribe