Effects of Heart Control at Different Stages in Patients of Septic Shock With Tachycardia

May 19, 2022 updated by: Chinese Medical Association

Effects of Heart Control at Different Stages on Hemodynamics Parameters and Clinical Prognosis in Patients of Septic Shock With Tachycardia

A sigle-center, randomized controlled trial will be do to investigate the effects of esomol on heart rate, clinical parameters, mortality, and safety in septic shock patients with tachycardia at different stages, compared with patients who received conventional therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The incidence of septic shock complicated with tachycardia is high and the prognosis is poor. Enough attention should be paid to and appropriate treatment should be given. High heart rate and high cardiac output are beneficial compensatory reactions of sepsis and septic shock. However, excessive sympathetic activation and high heart rate also have adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Sustained tachycardia is harmful to patients with sepsis and septic shock and needs to be controlled. At present, it is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and β Receptor blockers have the functions of preventing and reversing sympathetic effects, anti arrhythmia, anti-inflammatory and balancing myocardial oxygen supply and demand. Therefore, they are recommended to control arrhythmias in patients with septic shock. The 2014 guidelines for sepsis / septic shock in China suggest that if cardiac output is not low and the heart rate is fast after adequate fluid resuscitation, short acting drugs(β Receptor blockers)can be considered. However, there are some differences in the current clinical research results, and it suggests that the timing of treatment may affect the hemodynamic results and clinical outcomes of patients.

Therefore, this study intends to intervene with esmolol in patients with septic shock and tachycardia at different stages, and compare the hemodynamic parameters, clinical outcome, prognosis and adverse reactions with the conventional treatment group, in order to explore the appropriate time of esmolol in the treatment of patients with septic shock and tachycardia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

" ≥ 18 years old; " New septic shock within 24 hours, meeting the diagnostic criteria in 2012; " Septic shock lasts for more than 6 hours, and after fluid optimization using dynamic parameters, vasoactive drugs are still needed to maintain blood pressure; " the heart rate is greater than 100 beats / min for ≥ 1 hour,not caused by agitation, fever, and other factors; " informed consents are signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

" Shock caused by sepsis; " Septic cardiomyopathy or decreased myocardial contractility, requiring the use of positive inotropic drugs or significant cardiac insufficiency, such as CI ≤ 2.2l/min m2, PAWP>18mmHg, EF<40%; " Severe bronchial asthma or COPD; " Pregnant or lactating women; " Sinus bradycardia, degree II and degree III heart block; " β-receptor blockers were used before enrollment or have the history of sinus tachycardia; " Severe valvular heart disease; " Allergic to esmolol; " Tachycardia due to elevated body temperature, agitation, insufficient capacity and other reasons; " Have participated in other clinical studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group A
Esmolol is used 6 to 24 hours after onset of septic shock in patients with fluid optimization to control heart beats between 70-100bpm.
a continuous esmolol infusion titrated to maintain heart rate between 70/min and 100/min
Other Names:
  • β-receptor blockers
EXPERIMENTAL: Group B
Esmolol is used 24 hours after onset of septic shock in patients to control heart beats between 70-100bpm.
a continuous esmolol infusion titrated to maintain heart rate between 70/min and 100/min
Other Names:
  • β-receptor blockers
NO_INTERVENTION: Group C
patients received conventional therapy in accordance with septic shock guidelines 2021

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
at 24-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
at 48-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
at 72-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
the proportion of patients with heart rate of 70-100 bpm
at 96-hour after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiac index
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
PiCCO monitoring parameters
at 24-hour after randomization
cardiac index
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
PiCCO monitoring parameters
at 48-hour after randomization
cardiac index
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
PiCCO monitoring parameters
at 72-hour after randomization
cardiac index
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
PiCCO monitoring parameters
at 96-hour after randomization
ejection fraction
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
cardiac measurement by cardiac ultrasound
at 24-hour after randomization
ejection fraction
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
cardiac measurement by cardiac ultrasound
at 48-hour after randomization
ejection fraction
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
cardiac measurement by cardiac ultrasound
at 72-hour after randomization
ejection fraction
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
cardiac measurement by cardiac ultrasound
at 96-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value by arterial blood gas analysis
at 24-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value by arterial blood gas analysis
at 48-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value by arterial blood gas analysis
at 72-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
Arterial blood PH value by arterial blood gas analysis
at 96-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate by arterial blood gas analysis
at 24-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate by arterial blood gas analysis
at 48-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate by arterial blood gas analysis
at 72-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
Arterial blood lactate by arterial blood gas analysis
at 96-hour after randomization
APACHEII scores
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores,value 0~60, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 24-hour after randomization
APACHEII scores
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores,value 0~60, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 48-hour after randomization
APACHEII scores
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores,value 0~60, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 72-hour after randomization
APACHEII scores
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores,value 0~60, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 96-hour after randomization
SOFA scores
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
sepsis-related organ failure assessment score,value 4~24, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 24-hour after randomization
SOFA scores
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
sepsis-related organ failure assessment score,value 4~24, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 48-hour after randomization
SOFA scores
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
sepsis-related organ failure assessment score,value 4~24, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 72-hour after randomization
SOFA scores
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
sepsis-related organ failure assessment score,value 4~24, the higher score means worse outcome.
at 96-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose
Time Frame: at 24-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose (ug/kg.min)
at 24-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose
Time Frame: at 48-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose (ug/kg.min)
at 48-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose
Time Frame: at 72-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose (ug/kg.min)
at 72-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose
Time Frame: at 96-hour after randomization
norepinephrine dose (ug/kg.min)
at 96-hour after randomization
ICU- free days (by 28 days)
Time Frame: from randomization until 28 days
days free of ICU
from randomization until 28 days
28-day mortality
Time Frame: from randomization until 28 days
28-day mortality
from randomization until 28 days
days of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: from randomization until 28 days
days of mechanical ventilation
from randomization until 28 days
the incidence of hypotension deteriorated
Time Frame: by 96-hour after randomization
the incidence of hypotension deteriorated
by 96-hour after randomization
the incidence of heart arrest
Time Frame: by 96-hour after randomization
the incidence of heart arrest
by 96-hour after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Esmolol

3
Subscribe