Applying High Resolution Impedance Manometry for Perioperative Swallowing Changes in Older Patients Receiving Endotracheal Intubation or Supraglottic Airway Devices During Orthopedic Surgery

February 6, 2024 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Applying High Resolution Impedance Manometry for Perioperative Swallowing Changes in Older Patients Receiving Endotracheal Intubation or Supraglottic Airway Devices During Orthopedic Surgery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

We aimed to investigate whether patients with tracheal intubation has high hypopharyngeal pressure than patients with supraglottic airway does by using high resolution impedance manometry. We expected that the patients with endotracheal intubation have higher hypopharyngeal pressure than the patients with supraglottic airway devices.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: More and more older patients required to receive orthopedic surgery recently. The intubation or supraglottic airway device are required to maintain airway during general anesthesia. Previous studies only reported the subjective swallowing discomfort feeling, however, the objective data was limited. The high-resolution impedance manometry could detect the swallowing muscle power changes with multiple pressure sensors and impedance channels.

Objectives: we aimed to investigate whether patients with tracheal intubation has high hypopharyngeal pressure than patients with supraglottic airway does Patients and methods: The patients receive orthopedic surgery with older than 60 years old. They received high resolution impedance manometry examination at preoperative day, in the post-anesthetic care unit, postoperative day 3 to 7 (pick a day) along with subjective questionnaires. We also followed the IDDSI guideline to test different viscosity of the patients' tolerance for food.

Expected result: The patients with endotracheal intubation have higher hypopharyngeal pressure than the patients with supraglottic airway devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Chih-Min Liu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients receive orthopedic surgery with older than 60 years old including 60 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients had severe major organ dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: endotracheal intubation
under general anesthesia, patients received tracheal intubation.
under general anesthesia, patients received endotracheal intubation
Experimental: supraglottic airway device
under general anesthesia, patients received supraglottic airway device
under general anesthesia, patients received supraglottic airway device
Other Names:
  • laryngeal mask airway

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hypopharyngeal mean peak pressure
Time Frame: 15 minutes
hypopharyngeal pressure during food bolus transmittion
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202204071RINC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

ethical issue

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypopharyngeal Mean Pressure

Clinical Trials on endotracheal intubation

3
Subscribe