Efficacy and Safety of CSA and Avatrombopag for the Treatment of SAA in the Elderly (SAA)

June 22, 2022 updated by: Fengkui Zhang, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital

A Multicenter, Single-arm Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of CSA in Combination With Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Primary Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia in the Elderly

This is a multicenter, single-arm clinical study. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSA in combination with Avatrombopag in elderly patients with very/sever aplastic anemia treated for the first time. The design was: cyclosporine 3 mg/kg orally in two divided doses, with cyclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 200-250 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy, and Avatrombopag, which was administered in two dose groups, 40 mg orally once daily and 60 mg orally once daily, for a total of 24 weeks. Forty patients are expected to be enrolled in each dose group, and a total of 80 patients are expected to be enrolled if both dose groups are conducted. Evaluation endpoint: OR rate at 24 weeks of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, single-arm clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSA combined with Avatrombopag. The patients are older than 60 years with diagnosis of very sever/sever aplastic anemia(V/SAA) without treatment before.

CSA is started at 3 mg/kg orally in two doses. Concentrations maintained at 200-250 ng/ml to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered by 25 mg every 3 months; Avatrombopag: two dosing groups, 40 mg orally once daily and 60 mg orally once daily, for a total of 24 weeks;Each dose group is expected to include 40 patients each. If the 40 mg dose group trial meets the desired trial objectives, the 60 mg dose group trial will not be conducted, and if the 40 mg dose group does not meet the desired trial objectives, the 60 mg dose group trial will be continued. A total of 80 patients were expected to be included if both dose groups were conducted.Overall response rate at 24 weeks of treatment and adverse events are the evaluation endpoint.Secondary study endpoints were: CRR and ORR at 12 and 52 weeks of treatment, CRR at 24 weeks, survival, and clonal evolution in follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300020
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. elderly patients with V/SAA with a definite diagnosis.
  2. age greater than 60 years, male or female.
  3. Subjects must complete all screening assessments as outlined in the trial protocol.
  4. Able to swallow or administer the drug orally.
  5. Cannot tolerate or refuse ATG therapy.
  6. No prior treatment with cyclosporine, tacrolimus or hormones or treatment for no more than 2 weeks.
  7. No prior application of TPO receptor agonists (including Thrombopoietin, Eltrombopag, Hetrombopag, etc.) or application of TPO receptor agonists for treatment with ≤ 5 total doses and ≤ 7 days of TPO receptor agonist drugs such as Eltrombopag, Hetrombopag, etc.
  8. Informed consent must be signed prior to the start of all specific study procedures, in consideration of the patient's condition, or by a member of the patient's immediate family if the patient's signature is not conducive to the treatment of the condition.

Exclusion Criteria:

No subject shall be enrolled in this study if he/she meets any of the following criteria.

  1. known diagnosis of congenital hematopoietic failure disorders (e.g. Fanconi anemia) and other causes of allogeneic cytopenias and bone marrow hypoproliferative disorders (e.g. hemolytic PNH, hypoproliferative MDS/AML, autoantibody-mediated allogeneic cytopenias, etc.);
  2. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding and/or infection despite standard treatment.
  3. patients with previous history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
  4. previous history of thrombosis.
  5. Patients with concurrent malignancy or potential cancer on immunosuppressive therapy.
  6. Those who are considered unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CSA + Avatrombopag
cyclosporine 3 mg/kg orally in two doses, with cyclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 200-250 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered by 25 mg every 3 months; Avatrombopag: two dosing groups, 40 mg orally once daily and 60 mg orally once daily, for a total of 24 weeks.If the 40 mg dose group trial meets the desired trial objectives, the 60 mg dose group trial will not be conducted.
cyclosporine in combination with Avatrombopag to treat
Other Names:
  • CSA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OR rate at 24 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage of the total number of patients receiving treatment who received a response at 24 weeks of treatment
24 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by information on Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) AE grading at 24 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent AE by CTCAE
24 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients with transformation at 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks of treatment
% of patients with transformation to PNH or MDS,AML, or other disease
24 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OR rate and CR rate at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients who received a response and who receive a complete response at 12 weeks of treatment
12 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by information on Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) AE grading at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent AE by CTCAE
12 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients with transformation at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
% of patients with transformation to PNH or MDS,AML, or other disease at 12 weeks
12 weeks of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OR rate and CR rate at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients who received a response and who receive a complete response at 52 weeks of treatment
52 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by information on Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) AE grading at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks of treatment
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent AE by CTCAE
52 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients with transformation at 52 weeks
Time Frame: 52 weeks of treatment
% of patients with transformation to PNH or MDS,AML, or other disease at 52 weeks
52 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Li Zhang, doctor, Anemia Treatment Center
  • Principal Investigator: Lei Ye, doctor, Anemia Treatment Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

You can ask for the researcher after completing the experiment

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Follow-up and publication of the paper are planned for December 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After the paper is written and published

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Aplastic Anemia

Clinical Trials on Avatrombopag

3
Subscribe