Changes in Arch Parameters After Molar Distalization; Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer Versus Pendulum

July 21, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Abdelrhman Shendy Abdelrhman

Changes in Arch Parameters After Molar Distalization; Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer Versus Pendulum in Adolescent Class II Patients Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

this study was to compare the changes in arch parameters after molar distalization; hybrid hyrax distalizer versus Pendulum distalizer using CBCT.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Evaluation of maxillary molar amount of distal movement and the amount of anchorage loss Arch length, arch width, arch depth

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo
    • Nasr City
      • Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt, 002
        • Mohamed Shendy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For group 1(Hybrid hyrax distalizer) Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
  • For group 2 (Pendulum distalizer) Patients with skeletal class I or class II malocclusion who needed upper first and second molar distalization for incisor retraction or relieving of the upper arch crowding and minimum or no crowding in lower jaw were selected.
  • All Patients had no systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment, periodontal disease and no previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Age range was 13 to 17 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missed upper first molar.
  • un-cooperative patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hybrid hyrax distalizer
Inverted hyrax with 2 miniscrews for 6 months for maxillary molar distal movement in class II angle malocclusion
class 2 Angle malocclusion
class 2 Angle malocclusion
Active Comparator: Pendulum distalizer device
Modified pendulum with miniscrews for 6 months for maxillary molar distal movement in class II angle malocclusion
class 2 Angle malocclusion
class 2 Angle malocclusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Angles in degree SNA,SNB,ANB, Molar Rotation
Time Frame: 6 months
Using cbct and cast
6 months
Arch parameters in millimeter Arch length, width,depth and circumference
Time Frame: 6 Months
Assessment of airway using cbct
6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasopharyngeal airway dimensions in Cubic centimeters
Time Frame: 6 months
CBCT
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed AE Shendy, Lecturer - Orthodontic department -faculty of dental medicine -Al-Azhar university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 25, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Comparison between two techniques of molar distalization

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 Months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

shendy_ortho@azhar.edu.eg

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Angle Class 2 Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Hybrid hyrax distalizer

3
Subscribe