Can a Self-guided Mobile Phone Application Program Improve Wellbeing in University Students

July 29, 2022 updated by: Tan Pei En Marie, National University, Singapore

Can a Self-guided Cognitive Behavioral-based Mobile Phone Application Program With a Self-Compassion Component Reduce Unhealthy Perfectionism in University Students - a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) With a 4-week Follow-up

This study seeks to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a mobile phone application-based intervention in improving wellbeing in young adults. 400 University students are randomized into 1 of 4 intervention types. Pre, mid and post-intervention outcome measures are compared to determine effectiveness of the various intervention types.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Access to a mobile phone with the following requirements: iPhone 8 and above, or Android 5.2+ (display greater than 5 inches)
  • Have scores of greater than or equal to 29 on the 'Concerns over Mistakes' subscale on the FMPS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who do not meet the inclusion criteria
  • Currently pregnant
  • Undergoing psychological treatment or counselling
  • Have any change in psychotropic medication within twelve weeks before starting intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Control
Engagement in a mobile application (Cooperation skills)
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Experimental: Self-Compassion (SC)
Self-Compassion focused exercises
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Self-Compassion (CBT+SC)
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Self-Compassion focused exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in maladaptive perfectionism
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS). A 35-item self-report questionnaire which assesses four sub-scales of perfectionism - Concern over mistakes, Excessive concern with parental expectations, Personal Standards and Concern with precision, order and organisation. It is scored on a five-point scale, from "Strongly disagree" (1) to "Strongly agree" (5). Higher scores reflect higher levels of maladaptive perfectionism.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Change in shame
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Internalized Shame Scale (ISS). A 30-item self-report questionnaire which assesses internalized shame, and a subscale of self-esteem. It is scored on a five-point scale from "Never" (1) to "Almost always" (5). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Change in Self-Compassion
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-SF). A 12-item self-report questionnaire which assesses degree of self-compassion. It is the briefer version of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) (Neff, 2003). It is scored on a five-point scale from "Almost never" (1) to "Almost all of the time" (5). A total score is derived from taking the mean of the 12 items. Higher scores reflect greater self- compassion.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depression
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21). A 21-item self-report questionnaire, which comprises of 3 subscales which assess levels of depression, anxiety and stress. It is scored on a four-point scale, from "Did not apply to me at all" (0) to "Applied to me very much or most of the time" (3). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21). A 21-item self-report questionnaire, which comprises of 3 subscales which assess levels of depression, anxiety and stress. It is scored on a four-point scale, from "Did not apply to me at all" (0) to "Applied to me very much or most of the time" (3). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Change in Stress
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21). A 21-item self-report questionnaire, which comprises of 3 subscales which assess levels of depression, anxiety and stress. It is scored on a four-point scale, from "Did not apply to me at all" (0) to "Applied to me very much or most of the time" (3). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Day 1, Day 8, Day 14, 4 weeks after completion of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Tan, National University, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NUS-IRB-2022-307

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Active Control

3
Subscribe